Dıplomacy (ENG) - Tüm Sorular
Ünite 1
Soru 1
Traditionally accepted, which of the following is the main actor of diplomacy?
Seçenekler
A
Foreign ministers
B
Diplomats
C
Specialists
D
Envoys
E
Advisers
Açıklama:
The main actors of diplomacy, as it is traditionally accepted regardless of its scope, are foreign ministers along with other employees of the ministry and the diplomatic agents in foreign countries, that is the head of mission and members of the diplomatic staff of the mission.
Soru 2
When the definition of diplomacy is considered, which of the following is thought to be defined first?
Seçenekler
A
Actors
B
Scope
C
Tasks
D
Functions
E
Envoys
Açıklama:
Scope: The first thing that has to be defined would be the scope of diplomacy since the other elements such as actors and tasks could only be determined according to how broad the scope is defined.
Soru 3
Which of the following is not one of the functions of a diplomatic mission according to the Article 3 of Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations?
Seçenekler
A
representing the sending state in the receiving state
B
protecting in the receiving state the interests of the sending state
C
observing their economic, cultural and scientific relations (develop)
D
negotiating with the government of the receiving state
E
promoting friendly relations between the sending state and the receiving state
Açıklama:
Functions: According to the Article 3 of Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, the functions of a diplomatic mission are representing the sending state in the receiving state, protecting in the receiving state the interests of the sending state and of its nationals, within the limits permitted by international law, negotiating with the government of the receiving state, ascertaining by all lawful means conditions and developments in the receiving State, and reporting thereon to the government of the sending state and promoting friendly relations between the sending state and the receiving state, and developing their economic, cultural and scientific relations.
Functions: According to the Article 3 of Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, the functions of a diplomatic mission are representing the sending state in the receiving state, protecting in the receiving state the interests of the sending state and of its nationals, within the limits permitted by international law, negotiating with the government of the receiving state, ascertaining by all lawful means conditions and developments in the receiving State, and reporting thereon to the government of the sending state and promoting friendly relations between the sending state and the receiving state, and developing their economic, cultural and scientific relations.
Functions: According to the Article 3 of Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, the functions of a diplomatic mission are representing the sending state in the receiving state, protecting in the receiving state the interests of the sending state and of its nationals, within the limits permitted by international law, negotiating with the government of the receiving state, ascertaining by all lawful means conditions and developments in the receiving State, and reporting thereon to the government of the sending state and promoting friendly relations between the sending state and the receiving state, and developing their economic, cultural and scientific relations.
Soru 4
It is generally accepted that modern diplomacy practices the started in ________.
Seçenekler
A
France
B
Spain
C
Germany
D
Italy
E
Austria
Açıklama:
It is generally accepted that modern diplomacy practices the started in Italy. As early practices of diplomacy started in Italy, early theories of diplomacy were also formulated there. One of the earlier of these theories belongs to Nicollo Machiavelli.
Soru 5
Which of the following is the diplomacy theorist whose main theme is the value of good ambassadors outlined in his book History of Italy?
Seçenekler
A
Machiavelli
B
Hugo Grotius
C
Richelieu
D
Earnest Satow
E
Guicciardini
Açıklama:
Another Florentine diplomat who has contributed to the theory of diplomacy is Francesco Guicciardini. The main theme in Guicciardini’s theory, which is generally outlined in his History of Italy, is the value of good ambassadors, which he sees as a source of prestige for the price.
Soru 6
Which of the following is a diplomatic theorist who wrote Three Books On the Law of War and Peace and who is a great opponent of war?
Seçenekler
A
Hugo Grotius
B
Earnest Satow
C
Richelieu
D
Harold Nicholson
E
Hans Morgenthau
Açıklama:
Another contributor of the diplomatic theory is Hugo Grotius, who is a great opponent of war and deems it acceptable when it is just, and for this reason according to him diplomacy has a vital role. His work Three Books On the Law of War and Peace is the reflection of this approach. He defines three methods to accommodate misunderstandings among states without a war.
Soru 7
Which of the following is an outcome of modern diplomacy, which came to exist after the Congress of Westphalia and usually functions through conferences?
Seçenekler
A
Bilateral diplomacy
B
Great power diplomacy
C
Multi-lateral diplomacy
D
Middle power diplomacy
E
Small state diplomacy
Açıklama:
Multi-lateral diplomacy is an outcome of modern diplomacy, which came to exist after the Congress of Westphalia and usually functions through conferences.
Soru 8
Which of the following refers to diplomatic engagements that take pace without the knowledge of the public?
Seçenekler
A
Conference diplomacy
B
Summit diplomacy
C
Coercive diplomacy
D
Secret diplomacy
E
Crisis diplomacy
Açıklama:
Secret diplomacy refers to diplomatic engagements that take place without the knowledge of the public. However it does not mean that the diplomatic meetings that occur behind closed doors are secret diplomacy.
Soru 9
Multi-track diplomacy consists of _______ tracks.
Seçenekler
A
five
B
six
C
seven
D
eight
E
nine
Açıklama:
Multi-track diplomacy claims that placing all aspects of unofficial diplomacy under track-two makes it difficult to seize whole scope and context of the field. For this reason, multi-track diplomacy offers a multilayer differentiation with nine tracks instead of two. It also foresees a cooperation with official diplomacy. Therefore, the first track in multitrack diplomacy is the government and its official representatives as the actors of traditional diplomacy. Track two would be the professional, experienced nonofficial attempts of conflict resolution through nongovernmental actors. Track three is defined as business and consequently is carried out by businessmen. This track is based on the assumptions that besides providing financial sources for conflict resolution and peace making efforts, these actors can also build mutual trust and friendship through economic and commercial channels. It is expected that economic ties and interests would forge the parties solve conflicts that could harm these ties and interests. Track four of multi-track diplomacy is carried out by private citizens. Often referred as citizen diplomacy, this track resembles the track-two diplomacy and makes it a sub-field of multi-track diplomacy. It brings together people from different sects of society, in workshops, exchange programs and joint projects in order to break prejudices and develop mutual understanding. Track five includes research, training, and education. Educational institutions from kindergarten to universities, research centres, tanks tanks can be actors of this diplomatic engagement. What is aimed with the mentioned activities is to get to the bottom of the conflict and formulate solutions through researches and study programs, train people who could carry out negotiation and mediation in resolving the conflict and raise awareness through educational institutions for a sustainable peace. Track six of multi-track diplomacy is activism and aims to raise awareness among the public and influence them though protests and gatherings about issues like peace, human rights, environment, social and economic justice. Track seven is religion and is based on directing the influence of religious beliefs, communities and institutions to conflict resolution by highlighting themes like shared values. Track eight is about the funding of all these multitrack diplomacy activities. The actors of this track, or the funders can be individuals, like philanthropists, or groups like communities, foundations and corporations. The last track, track nine is the communication and media. What is aimed with this track is to provide information that would influence the public opinion and bring people together despite the distances.
Soru 10
Which of the following is the author of the books The Prince, The Discourses on the First Ten Books of Titus Livy and The History of Florence?
Seçenekler
A
Ernset Satow
B
Richelieu
C
Hugo Grotius
D
Francesco Guicciardini
E
Nicollo Machiavelli
Açıklama:
During his career Machiavelli took part in the foreign relations of Florence with both other Italian city-states and foreign countries. His theory of diplomacy can be read through his works The Prince, The Discourses on the First Ten Books of Titus Livy and The History of Florence. The correct answer is E.
Soru 11
Who suggests that diplomacy should be based on deception?
Seçenekler
A
Ernest Satow
B
Richelieu
C
Hugo Grotius
D
Francesco Guicciardini
E
Nicollo Machiavelli
Açıklama:
Diplomacy according to Machiavelli is based on deception. This assumption of diplomacy is closely related to Machiavelli’s conception of human nature which he defines as “For it can be said about men in general that they are ungrateful, fickle, dissembling, hypocritical, cowardly, and greedy.” Therefore the diplomat can use deceptions, tricks and schemes in order to maximise the state’s interest in its relations with other states. The correct answer is E.
Soru 12
Which of the following suggests conference, arbitration and cast lots as the three main methods to prevent diplomatic misunderstandings?
Seçenekler
A
Ernest Satow
B
Hugo Grotius
C
Richelieu
D
Francesco Guicciardini
E
Nicollo Machiavelli
Açıklama:
Hugo Grotius defines three methods to accommodate misunderstandings among states without a war. (Grotius, 1121-1127) The first of these methods is the conference method. The second method is arbitration between parties who do not belong to the same jurisdiction and have no common judge to appeal to, which he considers to be not only convenient but necessary that “Congresses of Christian states were held, where, by them who are no ways interested on one side or other, the differences of contending parties might be made up; and that some means were thought upon to oblige the parties at variance to accept of a peace upon fair and reasonable terms.” What Grotius has suggested is still an important method of conflict resolution in international relations and considered as one of the main functions of diplomacy. The third and the last method to prevent war according to Grotius is to cast lots. The correct answer is B.
Soru 13
Which of the following countries is generally thought to be the birthplace of modern diplomacy?
Seçenekler
A
England
B
Italy
C
France
D
Spain
E
Germany
Açıklama:
It is generally accepted that modern diplomacy practices the started in Italy. As early practices of diplomacy started in Italy, early theories of diplomacy were also formulated there. The correct answer is B.
Soru 14
Which of the following is the type of diplomacy that uses famous people as advocates to publicize certain causes like peace, human rights, environment and raise awareness about these issues?
Seçenekler
A
celebrity diplomacy
B
sports diplomacy
C
digital diplomacy
D
cultural diplomacy
E
business diplomacy
Açıklama:
Celebrity diplomacy is the inclusion of celebrities as advocates to publicise certain causes like peace, human rights, environment and raise awareness about these issues. The correct answer is A.
Soru 15
Which of the following countries is not a member of The Group of Seven (G7) ?
Seçenekler
A
China
B
France
C
Germany
D
Japan
E
the USA
Açıklama:
The Group of Seven (G7) and The Group of Twenty (G20) The Group of Seven (G7), formerly G8 is a club of industrialised democratic states (France, Germany, Japan, the USA, the UK, Italy and Canada) that meets annually to discuss important economic, financial, and political issues. The correct answer is A.
Soru 16
Which of the following is a type of diplomacy that defines the use of limited force or the threat of using force in diplomatic relations, with the aim of achieving desired ends?
Seçenekler
A
Secret Diplomacy
B
Crisis Diplomacy
C
Coercive Diplomacy
D
Summit Diplomacy
E
Economic Diplomacy
Açıklama:
Coercive diplomacy defines the use of limited force or the threat of using force in diplomatic relations, with the aim of achieving desired ends. The correct answer is C.
Soru 17
Which of the followings is a version of coercive diplomacy?
Seçenekler
A
summit diplomacy
B
economic diplomacy
C
military diplomacy
D
public diplomacy
E
cultural diplomacy
Açıklama:
A version of coercive diplomacy is military diplomacy which can be described as the use of force of threat of it to achieve military goals. The use of naval force for the same ends is referred as gunboat diplomacy. the correct answer is C.
Soru 18
__________ is the conduct of relations between official entities and at least one unofficial, non-state entity?
Which of the following completes the sentence above?
Which of the following completes the sentence above?
Seçenekler
A
Bilateralism
B
Multilateralism
C
Secret diplomacy
D
Polylateralism
E
Track two diplomacy
Açıklama:
Polylateralism is the conduct of relations between official entities (such as a state, several states acting together, or a state-based international organisation) and at least one unofficial, non-state entity in which there is a reasonable expectation of systematic relationships, involving some form of reporting, communication, negotiation, and representation, but not involving mutual recognition as sovereign, equivalent entities. The correct answer is D.
Soru 19
Which of the following countries is not among the Group of Twenty (G20)?
Seçenekler
A
Turkey
B
Brazil
C
Russia
D
Norway
E
India
Açıklama:
The Group of 20 (G20) is made up of the G7 industrialised democratic countries, the five emerging BRICS countries, (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) seven other economically emerging countries (Argentina, Australia, Indonesia, Mexico, Saudi Arabia, South Korea, Turkey,) and the European Union, which together as the G20 represent the twenty largest global economies, generating approximately 85 per cent of global GDP. Although G20 began as a forum to discuss global economic stability, its agenda expanded to include the discussion of other topics, such as global security, global health, development, gender, climate change, migration, and the refugee crises. The correct answer is D.
Soru 20
Which of the following authors is among the early diplomatic theories?
Seçenekler
A
Machiavelli.
B
Freud.
C
Marx.
D
Darwin.
E
Aristotales.
Açıklama:
It is generally accepted that modern diplomacy practices the started in Italy. As early practices of diplomacy started in Italy, early theories of diplomacy were also formulated there. One of the earlier of these theories belongs to Nicollo Machiavelli. Thereofre, the correct option is A.
Soru 21
Which of the followings is Machiavelli's work that is generally accepted among the modern diplomacy practices?
Seçenekler
A
The Republic.
B
The Poetics.
C
Utopia.
D
The Prince.
E
Diplomacy.
Açıklama:
It is generally accepted that modern diplomacy practices the started in Italy. As early practices of diplomacy started in Italy, early theories of diplomacy were also formulated there. One of the earlier of these theories belongs to Nicollo Machiavelli. Machiavelli’s formulation of diplomacy is based on his experience of serving as diplomat of Florence, his home city, until the fall of the republic in Florence in 1512. During his career Machiavelli took part in the foreign relations of Florence with both other Italian city-states and foreign countries. His theory of diplomacy can be read through his works The Prince, The Discourses on the First Ten Books of Titus Livy and The History of Florence. Thereofre, the correct option is D.
Soru 22
Which work of Grotius defines three methods to accommodate misunderstandings among states without a war?
Seçenekler
A
The Discourses on the First Ten Books of Titus Livy and The History of Florence.
B
The Prince.
C
Three Books on the Law of War and Peace.
D
History of Italy.
E
Political Testament.
Açıklama:
Another contributor of the diplomatic theory is Hugo Grotius, who is a great opponent of war and deems it acceptable when it is just, and for this reason according to him diplomacy has a vital role. His work Three Books On the Law of War and Peace is the reflection of this approach. He defines three methods to accommodate misunderstandings among states without a war. Thereofre, the correct option is C.
Soru 23
Which work by Richelieu formulates ideas on diplomacy and also gives political advice for Louis XIII?
Seçenekler
A
Three Books On the Law of War and Peace.
B
Political Testament.
C
The Prince.
D
Guide to Diplomatic Practice.
E
History of Italy.
Açıklama:
French statesmen Richelieu has also formulated ideas on diplomacy. His theory of diplomacy can be derived from his Political Testament, in which he has penned political advice for Louis XIII. Having become the French prime minister in an age of continuous wars, Richelieu’s main concern was to establish peace and carry out peaceful relations with other states. Thereofre, the correct option is B.
Soru 24
Which work by Guicciardini emphasizes the value of good ambassadors?
Seçenekler
A
The Discourses on the First Ten Books of Titus Livy and The History of Florence.
B
Three Books On the Law of War and Peace
C
The Prince.
D
Political Testament.
E
History of Italy.
Açıklama:
Another Florentine diplomat who has contributed to the theory of diplomacy is Francesco Guicciardini. The main theme in Guicciardini’s theory, which is generally outlined in his History of Italy, is the value of good ambassadors, which he sees as a source of prestige for the price. Thereofre, the correct option is E.
Soru 25
Which of the followings is also used as a term to describe the post-1648 system of international relations?
Seçenekler
A
Magna Carta.
B
Peace of Westphalia.
C
Congress of Vienna.
D
Concert of Europe.
E
French Revolution.
Açıklama:
Congress of Westphalia (1644-48). The congress at which an end to the Thirty Years’ War was negotiated.The main fruits of the negotiations were the two treaties of peace signed on 24 October 1648 known collectively as either the “Treaty” or the “Peace” of Westphalia. They are generally reckoned to have resolved the structure and codified the constitutional rules of the European statessystem as it had emerged from the unity of medieval Christendom. Thereafter, it has not been unusual to see the term “Westphalian system” used to describe the post-1648 system of international relations, i.e. that in which states - secular, sovereign, independent, and equal - are the members, and stability is preserved by the balance of power, diplomacy and international law. Thereofre, the correct option is B.
Soru 26
Which of the followings defines the diplomatic relations between two states?
Seçenekler
A
Bilateral diplomacy.
B
Communiqué.
C
Multi-lateral diplomacy.
D
Concert of Europe.
E
Uni-lateral diplomacy
Açıklama:
In very broad terms it is possible to separate diplomatic relations between states into two, depending on the number of actors, as bilateral diplomacy and multilateral diplomacy. Whereas bilateral diplomacy defines relations between two states, multilateral diplomacy defines the relations between more than two such actors. Thereofre, the correct option is B.
Soru 27
Which of the followings is not a type of diplomacy?
Seçenekler
A
Conference and Summit Diplomacies.
B
Crisis Diplomacy.
C
Secret Diplomacy.
D
Coercive Diplomacy.
E
Social Diplomacy.
Açıklama:
The constantly widening world of diplomacy requires different methods applied to different cases. This has led to the formulation of different types of diplomacy. Some of them are those that have been used by states for a very long time. But some are relative new and probably would not be considered as diplomacy in the nineteenth or even the significant part of the twentieth century. There is a big variety of diplomacies in this sense. It is not in the capacity of this chapter to dwell upon them all but the most important will be examined.
Secret Diplomacy
Conference and Summit Diplomacies
Coercive Diplomacy
Crisis Diplomacy
Track Two Diplomacy and Multitrack Diplomacy
Economic Diplomacy
Public Diplomacy
Digital Diplomacy
Thereofre, the correct option is E.
Secret Diplomacy
Conference and Summit Diplomacies
Coercive Diplomacy
Crisis Diplomacy
Track Two Diplomacy and Multitrack Diplomacy
Economic Diplomacy
Public Diplomacy
Digital Diplomacy
Thereofre, the correct option is E.
Soru 28
Which of the followings is one of the versions of coercive diplomacy?
Seçenekler
A
Gunboat diplomacy.
B
Multi-track diplomacy.
C
Business diplomacy.
D
Cultural diplomacy.
E
Sports diplomacy.
Açıklama:
A version of coercive diplomacy is military diplomacy which can be described as the use of force of threat of it to achieve military goals. The use of naval force for the same ends is referred as gunboat diplomacy. Therefore, the correct option is A
Soru 29
Which of the followings is one of the versions of public diplomacy?
Seçenekler
A
Business diplomacy.
B
Celebrity diplomacy.
C
Multi-track diplomacy.
D
Military diplomacy.
E
Summit diplomacy.
Açıklama:
Celebrity diplomacy is the inclusion of celebrities as advocates to publicise certain causes like peace, human rights, environment and raise awareness about these issues. Therefore, the correct option is B.
Soru 30
- The first thing that has to be defined would be the tasks of diplomacy.
- The scope of diplomacy has narrowed down through the course of history.
- The actor diversification in diplomacy is closely related to rapid globalization.
Seçenekler
A
I
B
II
C
III
D
I-II
E
II-III
Açıklama:
The first thing that has to be defined would be the scope of diplomacy since the other elements such as actors and tasks could only be determined according to how broad the scope is defined. When the term is taken in a narrow sense it usually describes political relations between states and includes the practices of the diplomats and ministries of foreign affairs. That is why history of international relations between states is defined as diplomatic history. Defining diplomacy as an instrument of foreign policy is not incorrect but is incomplete. In modern international relations it is no longer possible to define diplomacy only in terms of foreign policy or political relations between states that is carried out by statesmen and diplomats. The scope of diplomacy has expanded through the course of history. In several periods in history the scope of diplomacy has become a matter of discussion among the theoreticians and practitioners of diplomacy. Many have mentioned and accepted that there was old diplomacy and a new diplomacy. This points to the evolving character of diplomacy. Each era has a new diplomacy of its own. This is especially true for the twenty-first century. For this reason, it is necessary to adopt a broader approach. The correct answer is Choice C.
Soru 31
Which of the following is the most important function of diplomacy?
Seçenekler
A
Monitoring
B
Representation
C
Communication
D
Protection of citizens
E
Contribution to international order
Açıklama:
The most important function of diplomacy, regardless of its scope or its actors, is communication. In a sense diplomacy is communication itself. Another major function of diplomacy is representation. The main instrument of representation is embassies and its main actors are ambassadors, consulates, attaches and other diplomatic personnel. Monitoring the receiving state is one of the oldest functions of diplomacy. The aim of monitoring is to gather information about the receiving state and report this information to the sending state. The correct answer is Choice C.
Soru 32
In which of the following did the modern diplomacy practices start?
Seçenekler
A
Italy
B
Spain
C
France
D
The United States
E
The United Kingdom
Açıklama:
It is generally accepted that modern diplomacy practices the started in Italy. The correct answer is Choice A.
Soru 33
- Diplomacy had to be permanent.
- Diplomacy was based on deception.
- Diplomacy was more important than military power.
Seçenekler
A
I
B
II
C
III
D
I-II
E
II-III
Açıklama:
One of the earlier of these theories belongs to Nicollo Machiavelli. Diplomacy, according to Machiavelli, must be permanent, in the sense that states should have diplomatic representatives, at least in those countries that they have high interests whether they are allies or enemies. Still even though he himself was a diplomat, Machiavelli believed that military power was more important than diplomacy. But because not all states had enough military power to pursue their aims, they needed diplomacy. Diplomacy according to Machiavelli is based on deception. This assumption of diplomacy is closely related to Machiavelli’s conception of human nature which he defines as “For it can be said about men in general that they are ungrateful, fickle, dissembling, hypocritical, cowardly, and greedy.” The correct answer is Choice D.
Soru 34
Which of the following emphasized the significance of the value of good ambassadors while defining diplomacy?
Seçenekler
A
Ernest Satow
B
Hugo Grotius
C
Nicollo Machiavelli
D
Francesco Guicciardini
E
Armand Jean du Plessis de Richelieu
Açıklama:
The first significant diplomatic writer of the twentieth century is Ernest Satow. Satow owes his reputation in diplomatic theory to his book Guide to Diplomatic Practice, which was the first remarkable book in English language about the theory and practice of diplomacy when it was published in 1917. It is a comprehensive study which covers not only the roles and functioning of diplomatic institutions and actors but also gives a historical account of diplomacy.
Hugo Grotius, who is one of the contributors of the diplomatic theory, a great opponent of war and deems it acceptable when it is just, and for this reason according to him diplomacy has a vital role. His work Three Books On the Law of War and Peace is the reflection of this approach. He defines three methods to accommodate misunderstandings among states without a war. (Grotius, 1121-1127) The first of these methods is the conference method. The second method is arbitration between parties who do not belong to the same jurisdiction and have no common judge to appeal to, which he considers to be not only convenient but necessary that “Congresses of Christian states were held, where, by them who are no ways interested on one side or other, the differences of contending parties might be made up; and that some means were thought upon to oblige the parties at variance to accept of a peace upon fair and reasonable terms.” What Grotius has suggested is still an important method of conflict resolution in international relations and considered as one of the main functions of diplomacy. The third and the last method to prevent war according to Grotius is to cast lots.
Diplomacy, according to Machiavelli, must be permanent, in the sense that states should have diplomatic representatives, at least in those countries that they have high interests whether they are allies or enemies. Still even though he himself was a diplomat, Machiavelli believed that military power was more important than diplomacy. But because not all states had enough military power to pursue their aims, they needed diplomacy. Diplomacy according to Machiavelli is based on deception. This assumption of diplomacy is closely related to Machiavelli’s conception of human nature which he defines as “For it can be said about men in general that they are ungrateful, fickle, dissembling, hypocritical, cowardly, and greedy.”
French statesmen Richelieu has also formulated ideas on diplomacy. His theory of diplomacy can be derived from his Political Testament, in which he has penned political advice for Louis XIII. Having become the French prime minister in an age of continuous wars, Richelieu’s main concern was to establish peace and carry out peaceful relations with other states. For this reason he attributed great significance to diplomacy. The main theme of Richelieu’s theory is negotiations.
The main theme in Guicciardini’s theory, which is generally outlined in his History of Italy, is the value of good ambassadors, which he sees as a source of prestige for the price. According to him a well-trained, qualified ambassador is a sign of value of the prince as well and should be rewarded.
The correct answer is Choice D.
Hugo Grotius, who is one of the contributors of the diplomatic theory, a great opponent of war and deems it acceptable when it is just, and for this reason according to him diplomacy has a vital role. His work Three Books On the Law of War and Peace is the reflection of this approach. He defines three methods to accommodate misunderstandings among states without a war. (Grotius, 1121-1127) The first of these methods is the conference method. The second method is arbitration between parties who do not belong to the same jurisdiction and have no common judge to appeal to, which he considers to be not only convenient but necessary that “Congresses of Christian states were held, where, by them who are no ways interested on one side or other, the differences of contending parties might be made up; and that some means were thought upon to oblige the parties at variance to accept of a peace upon fair and reasonable terms.” What Grotius has suggested is still an important method of conflict resolution in international relations and considered as one of the main functions of diplomacy. The third and the last method to prevent war according to Grotius is to cast lots.
Diplomacy, according to Machiavelli, must be permanent, in the sense that states should have diplomatic representatives, at least in those countries that they have high interests whether they are allies or enemies. Still even though he himself was a diplomat, Machiavelli believed that military power was more important than diplomacy. But because not all states had enough military power to pursue their aims, they needed diplomacy. Diplomacy according to Machiavelli is based on deception. This assumption of diplomacy is closely related to Machiavelli’s conception of human nature which he defines as “For it can be said about men in general that they are ungrateful, fickle, dissembling, hypocritical, cowardly, and greedy.”
French statesmen Richelieu has also formulated ideas on diplomacy. His theory of diplomacy can be derived from his Political Testament, in which he has penned political advice for Louis XIII. Having become the French prime minister in an age of continuous wars, Richelieu’s main concern was to establish peace and carry out peaceful relations with other states. For this reason he attributed great significance to diplomacy. The main theme of Richelieu’s theory is negotiations.
The main theme in Guicciardini’s theory, which is generally outlined in his History of Italy, is the value of good ambassadors, which he sees as a source of prestige for the price. According to him a well-trained, qualified ambassador is a sign of value of the prince as well and should be rewarded.
The correct answer is Choice D.
Soru 35
Which of the following is the author of “Three Books On the Law of War and Peace”?
Seçenekler
A
Ernest Satow
B
Hugo Grotius
C
Nicollo Machiavelli
D
Francesco Guicciardini
E
Armand Jean du Plessis de Richelieu
Açıklama:
One of the earlier of these theories belongs to Nicollo Machiavelli. Machiavelli’s formulation of diplomacy is based on his experience of serving as diplomat of Florence, his home city, until the fall of the republic in Florence in 1512. During his career Machiavelli took part in the foreign relations of Florence with both other Italian city-states and foreign countries. His theory of diplomacy can be read through his works The Prince, The Discourses on the First Ten Books of Titus Livy and The History of Florence. Another Florentine diplomat who has contributed to the theory of diplomacy is Francesco Guicciardini. The main theme in Guicciardini’s theory, which is generally outlined in his History of Italy, is the value of good ambassadors, which he sees as a source of prestige for the price. Hugo Grotius, who is a great opponent of war and deems it acceptable when it is just, and for this reason according to him diplomacy has a vital role. His work Three Books On the Law of War and Peace is the reflection of this approach. He defines three methods to accommodate misunderstandings among states without a war. French statesmen Richelieu has also formulated ideas on diplomacy. His theory of diplomacy can be derived from his Political Testament, in which he has penned political advice for Louis XIII. Having become the French prime minister in an age of continuous wars, Richelieu’s main concern was to establish peace and carry out peaceful relations with other states. The first significant diplomatic writer of the twentieth century is Ernest Satow. Satow owes his reputation in diplomatic theory to his book Guide to Diplomatic Practice, which was the first remarkable book in English language about the theory and practice of diplomacy when it was published in 1917. The correct answer is Choice B.
Soru 36
Which of the following writers who contributed to diplomatic theory is also considered to be the founder of international relations?
Seçenekler
A
Ernest Satow
B
Henry Kissinger
C
Harold Nicolson
D
Hans Morgenthau
E
Armand Jean du Plessis de Richelieu
Açıklama:
French statesmen Richelieu has formulated ideas on diplomacy like some authors in Italy. His theory of diplomacy can be derived from his Political Testament, in which he has penned political advice for Louis XIII. Having become the French prime minister in an age of continuous wars, Richelieu’s main concern was to establish peace and carry out peaceful relations with other states. The first significant diplomatic writer of the twentieth century is Ernest Satow. Satow owes his reputation in diplomatic theory to his book Guide to Diplomatic Practice, which was the first remarkable book in English language about the theory and practice of diplomacy when it was published in 1917. Another British diplomat who has contributed to diplomatic theory is Harold Nicolson. Like Satow he combined his experience with the history of diplomacy. In his book titled Diplomacy, which was published in 1939, a whole chapter is dedicated to the development of diplomatic theory. Another important writer who should be mentioned is Hans Morgenthau, who is considered the founder of international relations. Morgenthau’s theory, which he portrayed in his 1948 book Politics Among Nations, can also be read as a contribution to the theory of diplomacy although not dedicated to it. Morgenthau sees the quality of diplomacy as the most important of all the factors which make the power of a nation, since it is diplomacy that brings the different elements of national power to bear with maximum effect upon those points in the international situation which concern the national interest most directly. The last diplomatist/writer to be discussed in this chapter is Henry Kissinger. Kissinger’s famous work titled Diplomacy can actually be read as a history book and on many occasions he has been described as a historian. He does believe that international politics cannot be seized by only theoretical approach and for this reason the study of history is crucial. The correct answer is Choice D.
Soru 37
I.Breaking of diplomatic relations means the withdrawal of recognition.
II. Recognition of a state by itself requires the establishment of diplomatic relations.
III. Establishing diplomatic relations is only one of the facets of recognition for states.
Which of the statements above is/are true about the diplomacy between states?
II. Recognition of a state by itself requires the establishment of diplomatic relations.
III. Establishing diplomatic relations is only one of the facets of recognition for states.
Which of the statements above is/are true about the diplomacy between states?
Seçenekler
A
I
B
II
C
III
D
I-II
E
I-II-III
Açıklama:
In very broad terms it is possible to separate diplomatic relations between states into two, depending on the number of actors, as bilateral diplomacy and multilateral diplomacy. Whereas bilateral diplomacy defines relations between two states multilateral diplomacy defines the relations between more than two such actors. As is defined in the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, the establishment of diplomatic relations between States, and of permanent diplomatic missions, takes place by mutual consent. (Article 2) Establishing diplomatic relations is only one of the facets of recognition for states. Likewise being accepted to an international organization is a sign of acceptance in a broader sense. Recognition by itself does not require the establishment of diplomatic relations but is a necessary prerequisite for establishing diplomatic relations. Similarly breaking of diplomatic relations does not mean the withdrawal of recognition. Breaking up of diplomatic relations is a unilateral act, realised by an announcement of any of the states, on the contrary to bilateral agreement of establishment. States establish mutual relations usually with an agreement that can be in the fashion of an announcement, a joint decision, exchange of notes or issuing of a communiqué and in some rare cases states just encounter without any kind of agreement but just the implication of having agreed to have relations. The correct answer is Choice C.
Soru 38
- It functions through conferences.
- It serves as a ground for cooperation.
- League of Nations served as permanent base for multilateral diplomacy.
Seçenekler
A
I
B
II
C
III
D
I-II
E
I-II-III
Açıklama:
Multi-lateral diplomacy is an outcome of modern diplomacy, which came to exist after the Congress of Westphalia and usually functions through conferences. (See below: Conference Diplomacy) An important step towards multilateral diplomacy was the establishment League of Nations following the end of the First World War. What was novel about the League of Nations, especially in terms of diplomacy was that it served as permanent base for multilateral diplomacy which used be carried out through conferences that met for once and for some days only. Another phenomena that pushed the development of multilateral diplomacy was the significant increase in the number of states since 1945. Multilateral diplomacy has both strengths and weaknesses. On the weak side it may bring certain issues to a gridlock by any of the parties if a desired outcome is not reached. This may postpone or even sweep away the possibility of any solution. On the strong side it serves as a ground for cooperation. This cooperation can be directed to problem-solving as well as goal-setting in issues concerning the parties, which at times may include all states as in the case of League of Nations or United Nations. The correct answer is Choice E.
Soru 39
Which of the following refers to the meetings of heads of states or governments?
Seçenekler
A
Crisis diplomacy
B
Secret Diplomacy
C
Summit diplomacy
D
Coercive diplomacy
E
Conference diplomacy
Açıklama:
Crisis diplomacy defines the international efforts to manage and solve a crises. The need for crisis diplomacy has increased significantly since the world has become more interconnected and a crisis occurring in one region of the world becomes the concern of other states, on both regional and international level. It is to everyone’s knowledge that a major part of diplomacy is carried out in secrecy. Secret diplomacy refers to diplomatic engagements that take place without the knowledge of the public. However it does not mean that the diplomatic meetings that occur behind closed doors are secret diplomacy. If the term was defined in this way, almost all diplomatic intercourse would have to be defined as secret diplomacy. Neither does it mean confidentiality. What is meant by secret diplomacy is that the very existence of certain diplomatic meetings are kept secret from domestic and foreign publics.
Coercive diplomacy defines the use of limited force or the threat of using force in diplomatic relations, with the aim of achieving desired ends. This makes coercive diplomacy a type of engagement that differs from the generally accepted conceptualisation that diplomacy involves peaceful means in interstate relations.
Conference diplomacy refers to the multilateral diplomatic negotiations that take place in international conferences. But this does necessarily mean that all negotiations also occur with the participation of all actors. Bilateral or limited multilateral negotiations also take place among the participants of conference diplomacy.
Summit diplomacy refers to the meetings of heads of states or governments. It can be bilateral, brining the leaders of two states together or multilateral with the participation of several leaders. It also can be ad-hoc or institutionalised and regularly take place. The correct answer is Choice C.
Coercive diplomacy defines the use of limited force or the threat of using force in diplomatic relations, with the aim of achieving desired ends. This makes coercive diplomacy a type of engagement that differs from the generally accepted conceptualisation that diplomacy involves peaceful means in interstate relations.
Conference diplomacy refers to the multilateral diplomatic negotiations that take place in international conferences. But this does necessarily mean that all negotiations also occur with the participation of all actors. Bilateral or limited multilateral negotiations also take place among the participants of conference diplomacy.
Summit diplomacy refers to the meetings of heads of states or governments. It can be bilateral, brining the leaders of two states together or multilateral with the participation of several leaders. It also can be ad-hoc or institutionalised and regularly take place. The correct answer is Choice C.
Soru 40
Which of the followings usually describes political relations between states and includes the practices of the diplomats and ministries of foreign affairs in diplomacy?
Seçenekler
A
Actors
B
Scope
C
Functions
D
Communication
E
Tasks
Açıklama:
Defining Diplomacy: Actors, Tasks, Scope
Scope: The first thing that has to be defined would be the scope of diplomacy since the other elements such as actors and tasks could only be determined according to how broad the scope is defined. When the term is taken in a narrow sense it usually describes political relations between states and includes the practices of the diplomats and ministries of foreign affairs.
Scope: The first thing that has to be defined would be the scope of diplomacy since the other elements such as actors and tasks could only be determined according to how broad the scope is defined. When the term is taken in a narrow sense it usually describes political relations between states and includes the practices of the diplomats and ministries of foreign affairs.
Soru 41
Which of the following statements is not true regarding "Early Diplomatic Theories"?
Seçenekler
A
It is generally accepted that modern diplomacy practices the started in Italy.
B
Diplomacy, according to Machiavelli, must be permanent, in the sense that states should have diplomatic representatives, at least in those countries that they have high interests whether they are allies or enemies.
C
The main theme in Guicciardini’s theory, which is generally outlined in his History of Italy, is the value of good ambassadors, which he sees as a source of prestige for the price.
D
Hugo Grotius defines three methods to accommodate misunderstandings among states without a war.
E
According to Richelieu negotiations must be short term and directed by a single person - the foreign minister - otherwise they would not be successful or effective.
Açıklama:
Theories of Diplomacy
According to Richelieu negotiations must be continuous and directed by a single person - the foreign minister - otherwise they would not be successful or effective.
According to Richelieu negotiations must be continuous and directed by a single person - the foreign minister - otherwise they would not be successful or effective.
Soru 42
Which of the following diplomatic writers owes his reputation in diplomatic theory to his book Guide to Diplomatic Practice, which was the first remarkable book in English language about the theory and practice of diplomacy when it was published in 1917?
Seçenekler
A
Hugo Grotius
B
Francesco Guicciardini.
C
Ernest Satow
D
Hans Morgenthau
E
Henry Kissinger
Açıklama:
Diplomatic Theories and International Relations
The first significant diplomatic writer of the twentieth century is Ernest Satow. Satow owes his reputation in diplomatic theory to his book Guide to Diplomatic Practice, which was the first remarkable book in English language about the theory and practice of diplomacy when it was published in 1917.
The first significant diplomatic writer of the twentieth century is Ernest Satow. Satow owes his reputation in diplomatic theory to his book Guide to Diplomatic Practice, which was the first remarkable book in English language about the theory and practice of diplomacy when it was published in 1917.
Soru 43
Which of the followings is an outcome of modern diplomacy, which came to exist after the Congress of Westphalia and usually functions through conferences?
Seçenekler
A
Bilateral Diplomacy
B
Multi-lateral Diplomacy
C
Great Power Diplomacy
D
Middle Power Diplomacy
E
Small State Diplomacy
Açıklama:
Diplomacy Between States
Multi-lateral diplomacy is an outcome of modern diplomacy, which came to exist after the Congress of Westphalia and usually functions through conferences.
Multi-lateral diplomacy is an outcome of modern diplomacy, which came to exist after the Congress of Westphalia and usually functions through conferences.
Soru 44
Which of the following statements is not true regarding Great Power Diplomacy?
Seçenekler
A
A Great Power is generally described as a state that has influence in international relations.
B
There shouldn't be a consensus about which state is a great power.
C
The main shape great power diplomacy took in the Cold War Period was superpower diplomacy in a bipolar international system.
D
End of the Cold War brought along a new type of great power diplomacy, which can be described as hegemonic diplomacy.
E
Major powers in the international system carry out the old way of great power diplomacy through summits that they are represented by the head of states.
Açıklama:
Great Power Diplomacy
There should be a consensus about which state is a great power.
There should be a consensus about which state is a great power.
Soru 45
Which of the following statements is true regarding Small State Diplomacy?
Seçenekler
A
The term small power refers to the states which have neither the capacity nor the claim to be great power.
B
Small state diplomacy is usually a multilateral diplomacy.
C
Small state powers perceive international institutions as the ideal framework for governing international affairs and strive to provide multilateral solutions to global problems
D
A common feature of the diplomacy of small states as new states, is the importance that they attach to diplomatic representation.
E
They aim to reduce conflicts in the international system thorough multilateralism, negotiation and compromise and are willing to take the lead in such attempts.
Açıklama:
A common feature of the diplomacy of small states as new states, is the importance that they attach to diplomatic representation. As it is a sign of recognition and sovereignty, having representatives in other states and international organisations has been and is still an important part of diplomatic relations for the newly independent and small states.
Soru 46
Which of the followings is a version of coercive diplomacy?
Seçenekler
A
Summit Diplomacy
B
Crisis Diplomacy
C
Military Diplomacy
D
Multi- track Diplomacy
E
Economic Diplomacy
Açıklama:
A version of coercive diplomacy is military diplomacy which can be described as the use of force of threat of it to achieve military goals.
Soru 47
Which of the followings is the use of social media by government agencies and officials to engage with the public, disperse information and even leverage global influence?
Seçenekler
A
Celebrity diplomacy
B
Cultural diplomacy
C
Public Diplomacy
D
Twiplomacy
E
Track Two Diplomacy
Açıklama:
Digital Diplomacy
Twiplomacy
the use of Twitter and other social media sites by government agencies and officials to engage with the public, disperse information and even leverage global influence.
Twiplomacy
the use of Twitter and other social media sites by government agencies and officials to engage with the public, disperse information and even leverage global influence.
Soru 48
Which of the following diplomacy people's main concern of diplomacy is to avoid war, by using diplomatic methods, such as conference, negotiations, arbitration and compromise?
Seçenekler
A
Machiavelli
B
Francesco Guicciardini
C
Hugo Grotius
D
Cardinal Richelieu
E
Harold Nicolson
Açıklama:
“Review the theoretical framework of international diplomacy”
The main concern of Hugo Grotius in his theory of diplomacy is to avoid war, by using diplomatic methods, such as conference, negotiations, arbitration and compromise.
The main concern of Hugo Grotius in his theory of diplomacy is to avoid war, by using diplomatic methods, such as conference, negotiations, arbitration and compromise.
Soru 49
Which of the following theorists defines diplomacy as the most important factor which makes the power of a nation as it brings the different elements of national power together?
Seçenekler
A
Morgenthau
B
Henry Kissinger
C
Harold Nicolson
D
Hugo Grotius
E
Francesco Guicciardini
Açıklama:
Review the theoretical framework of international diplomacy”
Morgenthau, who is accepted as the founder of international relations discipline, defines diplomacy as the most important factor which makes the power of a nation as it brings the different elements of national power together.
Morgenthau, who is accepted as the founder of international relations discipline, defines diplomacy as the most important factor which makes the power of a nation as it brings the different elements of national power together.
Soru 50
Which of the following doesn't consist of the definition of " Diplomacy "?
Seçenekler
A
It is closely related to rapid globalisation.
B
It is the application of intelligence and tact to the conduct of official relations.
C
It is the management of international relations by negotiation.
D
It is concerned with the management of relations between states and other actors.
E
It is an essentially political activity and, well-resourced and skilful, a major ingredient of power.
Açıklama:
‘Diplomacy is the application of intelligence and tact to the conduct of official relations between the governments of independent states, extending sometimes also to their relations with vassal states; or, more briefly still, the conduct of business between states by peaceful means’ (Satow, 1932, 1).
‘Diplomacy is the management of international relations by negotiation; the method by which these relations are adjusted and managed by ambassadors and envoys; the business or art of the diplomatist’ (Harold Nicolson, 1969, 15). Doğru cevap " A " dır.
‘Diplomacy is the management of international relations by negotiation; the method by which these relations are adjusted and managed by ambassadors and envoys; the business or art of the diplomatist’ (Harold Nicolson, 1969, 15). Doğru cevap " A " dır.
Soru 51
Who are the main actors of diplomacy? Which of the following is correct?
Seçenekler
A
Human rights,
B
Foreign ministers,
C
None of them,
D
Many leaders,
E
Diplomatic relations,
Açıklama:
The main actors of diplomacy, as it is traditionally accepted regardless of its scope, are foreign ministers along with other employees of the ministry and the diplomatic agents in foreign countries, that is the head of mission and members
of the diplomatic staff of the mission. Doğru cevap " B " dir.
of the diplomatic staff of the mission. Doğru cevap " B " dir.
Soru 52
Which of the following is another major function of diplomacy?
Seçenekler
A
Negotiation,
B
Function,
C
Representation,
D
Information,
E
Protection,
Açıklama:
Another major function of diplomacy is representation. The main instrument of representation is embassies and its main actors are ambassadors, consulates, attaches and other diplomatic personnel. Representation can take several facets. Symbolic or ceremonial representation is one those. Doğru cevap " C " dir.
Soru 53
Which of the following is not one of the diplomats who have contributed to the theory of diplomacy?
Seçenekler
A
Nicollo Machiavelli,
B
Francesco Guicciardini,
C
Hugo Grotius,
D
Barston,
E
Richelieu,
Açıklama:
Machiavelli’s formulation of diplomacy is based on his experience of serving as
diplomat of Florence, his home city, until the fall of the republic in Florence in 1512. Another Florentine diplomat who has contributed to the theory of diplomacy is Francesco Guicciardini. Another contributor of the diplomatic theory is Hugo Grotius, who is a great opponent of war and deems it acceptable when it is just, and for this reason according to him diplomacy has
a vital role. French statesmen Richelieu has also formulated ideas on diplomacy. Doğru cevap " D " dir.
diplomat of Florence, his home city, until the fall of the republic in Florence in 1512. Another Florentine diplomat who has contributed to the theory of diplomacy is Francesco Guicciardini. Another contributor of the diplomatic theory is Hugo Grotius, who is a great opponent of war and deems it acceptable when it is just, and for this reason according to him diplomacy has
a vital role. French statesmen Richelieu has also formulated ideas on diplomacy. Doğru cevap " D " dir.
Soru 54
" The first significant diplomatic writer of the twentieth century is .................. ".
Which of the following correctly completes the sentence above?
Which of the following correctly completes the sentence above?
Seçenekler
A
Harold Nicolson,
B
Hans Morgenthau,
C
Henry Kissinger,
D
Otte Powers,
E
Ernest Satow,
Açıklama:
The first significant diplomatic writer of the twentieth century is Ernest Satow. Satow owes his reputation in diplomatic theory to his book Guide to Diplomatic Practice, which was the first remarkable book in English language about the theory and practice of diplomacy when it was published in 1917. Doğru cevap " E " dir.
Soru 55
Which of the following defines the concept of " multilateral diplomacy "?
Seçenekler
A
the relations between more than two such actors,
B
relations between two states,
C
international organisations,
D
diplomatic relations,
E
diplomatic states,
Açıklama:
In very broad terms it is possible to separate diplomatic relations between states into two, depending on the number of actors, as bilateral diplomacy and multilateral diplomacy. Whereas bilateral diplomacy defines relations between two states multilateral diplomacy defines the relations between more than two such actors. As is defined in the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, the establishment of diplomatic relations between States, and of permanent diplomatic missions, takes place by mutual consent. (Article 2) Doğru cevap " A " dır.
Soru 56
Which of the following is the correct definition of " Middle Power Diplomacy " ?
Seçenekler
A
It is an outcome of modern diplomacy.
B
It is usually a multilateral diplomacy.
C
It is generally described as a state that has influence in international relations.
D
It has less power in the international system.
E
It is a common feature of the diplomacy of small states.
Açıklama:
Middle power diplomacy is usually a multilateral diplomacy. This is because they lack the sources to be influential in unilateral and bilateral actions. Thus they prefer to establish alliances and coalitions with like-minded states, which would provide them a chance of leadership and influence. Middle powers perceive international institutions as the ideal framework for governing international affairs and strive to provide multilateral solutions to global problems and they also engage in multilateral activism to overcome a lack of bargaining power at the unilateral and bilateral level, and gain legality, legitimacy and moral authority for their assertive diplomatic initiatives. (Efstathopoulos,2018, 55) Doğru cevap " B " dir.
Soru 57
Which of the following is not one of the types of Diplomacy?
Seçenekler
A
Secret Diplomacy,
B
Conference and Summit Diplomacies,
C
Small State Diplomacy,
D
Coercive Diplomacy,
E
Crisis Diplomacy,
Açıklama:
It is to everyone’s knowledge that a major part of diplomacy is carried out in secrecy. Secret diplomacy refers to diplomatic engagements that take place without the knowledge of the public. Conference diplomacy refers to the multilateral diplomatic negotiations that take place in international conferences. Coercive diplomacy defines the use of limited force or the threat of using force in diplomatic relations, with the aim of achieving desired ends.Crisis diplomacy defines the international efforts to manage and solve a crises. On the other hand, Small State Diplomacy is not a type of Diplomacy. It is related to the Diplomatic Relations. Being a small state means to have relatively less power in the international system. They usually have small territory and population, low sources and income, weak economy and military, and high vulnerability. Therefore, the choice C is wrong answer. Doğru cevap " C " dir.
Soru 58
Which of the following is not one of the Tracks of Multi-Track Diplomacy?
Seçenekler
A
Government,
B
Funding,
C
Religious,
D
Resolution,
E
Business,
Açıklama:
Multi-track diplomacy claims that placing all aspects of unofficial diplomacy under track-two makes it difficult to seize whole scope and context of the field. For this reason, multi-track diplomacy offers a multilayer differentiation with nine tracks instead of two. It also foresees a cooperation with official diplomacy. Therefore, the first track in multitrack diplomacy is the government. Track two would be the professional, experienced nonofficial attempts of conflict resolution through nongovernmental actors. Track three is defined as business and consequently is carried out by businessmen. Track four of multi-track diplomacy is carried out by private citizens. Track five includes research, training, and education. Track six of multi-track diplomacy is activism. Track seven is religion and is based on directing the influence of religious beliefs, communities and institutions to conflict resolution by highlighting themes like shared values. Track eight is about the funding of all these multitrack diplomacy activities. The last track, track nine is the communication and media. On the other hand, the choice D resolution might have been used instead of Professional Conflict Resolution in Track Two, but it is missing. Therefore it is wrong answer. Doğru cevap " D " dir.
Soru 59
" It is the use of Twitter and other social media sites by government agencies and officials to engage with the public, disperse information and even leverage global influence. "
Which of the following is correct definition of the sentence above?
Which of the following is correct definition of the sentence above?
Seçenekler
A
Business diplomacy
B
Cultural diplomacy
C
Sports diplomacy
D
Celebrity diplomacy
E
Twiplomacy
Açıklama:
With the technological revolution informal channels have also appeared for people to communicate and inform each other and come together on the international level. The widespread usage of smartphones has furthered the impact of these new technologies, making everything instant. This has changed the nature of relations between the state and the citizen. With the more information they access and the opportunity to share it and come together the citizens have become more powerful. This helps them influence their states as well as other states and even the international politics. In this sense digital diplomacy is closely related to public diplomacy. Policy- makers employ digital diplomacy, especially social media, for several functions: to investigate what the public thinks about foreign policy choices; to educate the public about foreign policy and international relations; to explain challenges and alternative means to address them; and to cultivate public support for policies they have selected. (Gilboa, 2016, 546) Doğru cevap " E " dir.
Ünite 2
Soru 1
Which civilization was the earliest practitioner of diplomacy?
Seçenekler
A
Sumerians
B
Ancient China
C
Ancient Greece
D
The Roman
E
The Byzantine Empire
Açıklama:
Sumerians were the earliest practitioners of diplomacy (3000-2370 BCE). The diplomatic tradition emerged from this site mainly because the Sumerians were the civilization which invented writing sometime in the 4th millennium BCE. In the meantime, Sumeria was the site of the first urban communities consisted of complex social, economic and political structures each of which was ruled by an independent King.
Soru 2
Which of the following is FALSE about the first known diplomatic letter?
Seçenekler
A
It was a message sent by the King of Eblato the kingdom of Hamazi.
B
The letter had a similar style of language and contend of modern diplomacy.
C
It provied a clear evidence of the existence of a well performing mechanism.
D
It was written by the king himself, but not directed to the Hamazi but to his envoy.
E
It showed that diplomacy was mainly a part of their trade relations,.
Açıklama:
The first known diplomatic letter was a message sent by the King of Ebla (in northern Syria) to the kingdom of Hamazi (north of Iran today), which shows a similar style of language and contend of modern diplomacy. This letter provides a clear evidence of the existence of a well performing mechanism, in which both sides knew the rules. The letter was not written by the king himself, but through the voice of an official, and was not directed to the Hamazi King but to his envoy. Since the Ebla region had priority in trade, diplomacy was mainly a part of their trade relations, the reflection of which could also be seen in the Ebla letter.
Soru 3
Which of the following is TRUE about Mesopotamian Diplomacy?
Seçenekler
A
The expression of brotherhood was a sign that indicated the uneven relationship between the kings.
B
The system was mainly based on that of the Sumerians in the south, Babylonian and Akadian in the center and Assyrians in the north.
C
Sumerian language was the language of diplomacy in conformity with the political situation in this period.
D
Diplomacy as a means of foreign relations was ignored particularly under the rule of Babylon’s King Hammurabi.
E
The Mari cuneiform archives were one of the earliest and most informative resources about wars in Near East.
Açıklama:
One of the earliest and most informative resources regarding our knowledge on Near East diplomacy is the Mari cuneiform archives, which consist of more than 20 thousand letters, legal documents, diplomatic correspondences, and treaties written on clay tablets.
Diplomacy as a means of foreign relations was intensified particularly under the rule of Babylon’s sixth and most known King Hammurabi.
After the conquest of Sumer by the Akkadian, the Akkadian language supplanted Sumerian as the language of diplomacy in conformity with the political situation.
The concept of brotherhood included in this letter served as the central argument on which all superseding diplomatic relationship would be centered. The expression of brotherhood is at the same time a sign that indicate the equal relationship between the kings.
The system was mainly based on that of the Sumerians in the south, Babylonian and Akadian in the center and Assyrians in the north.
Diplomacy as a means of foreign relations was intensified particularly under the rule of Babylon’s sixth and most known King Hammurabi.
After the conquest of Sumer by the Akkadian, the Akkadian language supplanted Sumerian as the language of diplomacy in conformity with the political situation.
The concept of brotherhood included in this letter served as the central argument on which all superseding diplomatic relationship would be centered. The expression of brotherhood is at the same time a sign that indicate the equal relationship between the kings.
The system was mainly based on that of the Sumerians in the south, Babylonian and Akadian in the center and Assyrians in the north.
Soru 4
Which of the following information can we find in the Amarna letters?
Seçenekler
A
The importance of brotherhood
B
The dominant language in diplomacy
C
Strengthening friendly relations
D
Conspiracy theories about military attacks
E
Dynastic financial matters
Açıklama:
We find the Amarna letters which contain information about:
• Strategic-military cooperation,
• Treaty negotiations,
• Dynastic marriages,
• Trade regulations
• Strengthening friendly relations
• Negotiating alliances
• Strategic-military cooperation,
• Treaty negotiations,
• Dynastic marriages,
• Trade regulations
• Strengthening friendly relations
• Negotiating alliances
Soru 5
What was Hittite diplomacy best known for?
Seçenekler
A
Being a well-developed system, embracing all preceding diplomatic tools and rules of conduct.
B
The treaties including the information about the Hittite King
C
The first peace treaty signed between King Ramses II and King Hattusili
D
The start of the battle between the Egyptians and the Hittites
E
Dynastic marriages between the Egyptian and Hittite Kings
Açıklama:
Hittite diplomacy is best known for the first peace treaty signed in 1270 BCE between Egyptian King Ramses II and Hittite King Hattusili III after the battle of Kadesh in Syria. The Kadesh treaty was signed to end the long war between the Hittites and the Egyptians, which lasted for nearly two centuries for the domination over Syrian region.
Soru 6
Which of the following is FALSE about Sun-Tzu, one of the best known military strategists?
Seçenekler
A
Sun-Tzu lived in the Warring state era in Ancient China.
B
His most famous work is the Art of War.
C
"All war is based on deception." is his famous saying.
D
He mainly focused on war strategies rather than the ways to prevent them.
E
He focused on the pre-war period as the realm for strategy, hence diplomacy.
Açıklama:
Early records indicate that Sun-Tzu lived in the Warring state era and his very famous work The Art of War was influenced by the increasing violence of this era. In contrast to its name, the book does not really focus on war time strategies, but on strategies that would prevent the outbreak of war. The core of the strategy for Sun Tzu is not to defeat the enemy in battle, but to repress him without fighting. Sun Tzu therefore focuses on the pre-war period as the realm for strategy and hence pays particular attention to diplomacy at this stage. Sun-Tzu makes a number of suggestions for the use of diplomacy mostly before the war, but even usable during and after the war, all of which seem to be very important to be a good diplomacy player in international relations. He first advices to attack the enemy’s strategy before attacking the enemy itself. He then mentions indirect methods for manipulating the enemy’s actions in order to keep away the danger of being attacked. Another strategy Sun-Tzu suggests is to be flexible in strategy in regard to changing circumstances. Finally, his famous saying of “all war is based on deception” is another piece where his thoughts could be related to the logic of diplomacy.
Soru 7
Which of the following is the main source for ancient Greek diplomacy?
Seçenekler
A
Ramses
B
Sun-Tzu
C
Kautilya
D
Hammurabi
E
Thucydides
Açıklama:
The main source for ancient Greek diplomacy has been the writings of Thucydides. It is widely accepted that the first account of diplomacy at this period was a diplomatic conference held in 432 BCE. As Nicolson quoted from Thucydides, this conference was convened by Sparta to decide with its allies on punishing Athens with war due to its violation of treaties. While this conference was convened by Sparta for its allies of the Peloponnesian League against Athens, it is known that an Athenian delegation was also allowed to participate at and even to be involved in debates. In fact, the Athenian delegation was there for another specific mission but still was allowed to attend; and this is a sign that by 5th century BCE Greeks were aware of some diplomatic right and some kind of immunity.
Soru 8
Which of the following is TRUE about ancient Greece diplomacy?
Seçenekler
A
They preferred oral messages to written notes.
B
There is a large archive of ancient Greek diplomacy.
C
There were two types of representatives: angelos and keryx.
D
Envoys were selected from ordinary citizens.
E
Representatives were first expected to show their written abilities.
Açıklama:
In the Ancient Greek diplomacy, they preferred oral messages to written notes; therefore, there is not a large archive of diplomatic correspondence of ancient Greece.
There were three kinds of representatives:
• angelos: a messenger used for brief and specific missions
• keryx: a herald
• proxenos: a resident consul but the proxenos were citizens of the city in which they resided, not of the city-state that employed them. If a resident representative was needed in another state, then a resident was given the title of proxenos by the state which he represented. In other words, the proxenos looked after the interests of a foreign state while residing in the state of which he was a citizen.
Envoys were selected from among the prominent members of the state by the city assembly and they were not necessarily qualified persons. They were rather chosen for their political stance and for their association with the state which they were negotiating with. Representatives were first expected to show their oratorical abilities. The number of members in a mission ranged from three to ten men, and they were given brief instructions such as; ratifying treaties by oral oath, inquiring about terms for peace, and solving a dispute in the interest of the community.
There were three kinds of representatives:
• angelos: a messenger used for brief and specific missions
• keryx: a herald
• proxenos: a resident consul but the proxenos were citizens of the city in which they resided, not of the city-state that employed them. If a resident representative was needed in another state, then a resident was given the title of proxenos by the state which he represented. In other words, the proxenos looked after the interests of a foreign state while residing in the state of which he was a citizen.
Envoys were selected from among the prominent members of the state by the city assembly and they were not necessarily qualified persons. They were rather chosen for their political stance and for their association with the state which they were negotiating with. Representatives were first expected to show their oratorical abilities. The number of members in a mission ranged from three to ten men, and they were given brief instructions such as; ratifying treaties by oral oath, inquiring about terms for peace, and solving a dispute in the interest of the community.
Soru 9
Which of the following is TRUE about the Roman Empire in terms of diplomacy?
Seçenekler
A
The Roman Empire contributed a lot to the development of diplomacy.
B
They preferred imposing their policies on others instead of negotiating.
C
Its contribution to diplomacy is much more related to practice of diplomacy.
D
In its early years people were not allowed to express their wills through assemblies.
E
Envoys from foreign powers always came before the assemblies of the people.
Açıklama:
Considering its longevity and organization, the Roman Empire contributed little to the development of diplomacy. This may be explained by their will to impose their policies on others instead of negotiating.
It is widely accepted that the contribution of Romans to diplomacy is much more related to the international law and is represented in the theory, not the practice, of diplomacy.
In the early years of the Roman Republic, procedures similar to those developed in Greece were used. People were expressing their will through popular assemblies, and therefore were arbiters of diplomatic issues such as war, peace and treaties. Envoys from foreign powers never came before the assemblies of the people. However, as Rome came to power, the Senate took over the authority and gained a disproportionate influence, along with the right of choosing and instructing envoys and of receiving incoming embassies. After the empire was established, diplomacy turned to be part of regular government policy which was in the hands of the emperor, despite the Senate remained.
It is widely accepted that the contribution of Romans to diplomacy is much more related to the international law and is represented in the theory, not the practice, of diplomacy.
In the early years of the Roman Republic, procedures similar to those developed in Greece were used. People were expressing their will through popular assemblies, and therefore were arbiters of diplomatic issues such as war, peace and treaties. Envoys from foreign powers never came before the assemblies of the people. However, as Rome came to power, the Senate took over the authority and gained a disproportionate influence, along with the right of choosing and instructing envoys and of receiving incoming embassies. After the empire was established, diplomacy turned to be part of regular government policy which was in the hands of the emperor, despite the Senate remained.
Soru 10
Divide and Rule -Divide et Imperia was an important strategy for __________ .
Choose the correct option.
Choose the correct option.
Seçenekler
A
Ancient Greek and Ancient China
B
Mesopotamia and Ancient China
C
Roman Empire and Byzantine Empire
D
Byzantine Empire and Islamic World
E
Roman Empire and Ancient Greek
Açıklama:
Divide and Rule -Divide et Imperia
It was an important strategy for the Roman imperial system. Romans divided the newly conquered peoples into their component units such as tribes; or city-states made separate alliances and treaties with each to control and make them contribute to the defense of the empire in common. The Byzantine Empire adopted this method in its external affairs with divide its enemies and embroil them to each other.
It was an important strategy for the Roman imperial system. Romans divided the newly conquered peoples into their component units such as tribes; or city-states made separate alliances and treaties with each to control and make them contribute to the defense of the empire in common. The Byzantine Empire adopted this method in its external affairs with divide its enemies and embroil them to each other.
Soru 11
Which of the following were the earliest practitioners of diplomacy between the periods 3000-2370 BCES in Mesopotamia?
Seçenekler
A
Sumerians
B
Babylonians
C
Akkadians
D
Assyrians
E
Egyptians
Açıklama:
Sumerians were the earliest practitioners of diplomacy (3000-2370 BCE). The diplomatic tradition emerged from this site mainly because the Sumerians were the civilization which invented writing sometime in the 4th millennium BCE. In the meantime, Sumeria was the site of the first urban communities consisted of complex social, economic and political structures each of which was ruled by an independent King.
Diplomacy was used by Sumerians with a motivation to end conflicts through the conventional method of sending messengers with the messages written on clay tablets in cuneiform. Sumerian was used as the lingua franca of diplomacy until the Akkadian hegemony was established in the region. S 38
Diplomacy was used by Sumerians with a motivation to end conflicts through the conventional method of sending messengers with the messages written on clay tablets in cuneiform. Sumerian was used as the lingua franca of diplomacy until the Akkadian hegemony was established in the region. S 38
Soru 12
Which of the following is not one of five major kingdoms of the system defined as “Great Powers’ Club?
Seçenekler
A
The kingdom of Hatti
B
The kingdom of Mari
C
The kingdom of Mittanni
D
The kingdom of Assyria
E
Kingdom of Egypt
Açıklama:
The structure of the inter-state system of this Late Bronze Age period can be defined as a system of a “Great Powers’ Club” along with some vassal states dependent on Great Kingdoms. The Great Power Club was composed of five major kingdoms: the kingdom of Hatti, the kingdom of Mittanni, the kingdom of Assyria, the kingdom of Kassite of Babylon and the kingdom of Egypt.
Soru 13
Which of the following is not a characteristics of the book “The Art of War” by Sun-Tzu who lived in the Warring States Era between 656-221 BCE in ancient China?
Seçenekler
A
the book focuses on strategies that would prevent the outbreak of war
B
The core of the strategy for Sun Tzu is not to defeat the enemy in battle
C
the book does really focus on war time strategies
D
The core of the strategy for Sun Tzu is to repress the enemy without fighting
E
He first advises to attack the enemy’s strategy before attacking the enemy itself
Açıklama:
Ancient China can be categorized under two different periods regarding the political structure of the time. The first is the Warring States Era between 656-221 BCE, characterized by the emergence of sovereign states. It was a period of a balance of a power system, so international relations was based on great power rivalry and ephemeral alliances (Hamilton, 1995:12). The Great Powers had leagues, missions and an organized system of correspondence between their many warring states. It is not surprising that Sun-Tzu, one of the best known military strategists, and his thoughts were influential at this period. Early records indicate that Sun-Tzu lived in the Warring state era and his very famous work The Art of War was influenced by the increasing violence of this era. In contrast to its name, the book does not really focus on war time strategies, but on strategies that would prevent the outbreak of war. The core of the strategy for Sun Tzu is not to defeat the enemy in battle, but t
Ancient China can be categorized under two different periods regarding the political structure of the time. The first is the Warring States Era between 656-221 BCE, characterized by the emergence of sovereign states. It was a period of a balance of a power system, so international relations was based on great power rivalry and ephemeral alliances (Hamilton, 1995:12). The Great Powers had leagues, missions and an organized system of correspondence between their many warring states. It is not surprising that Sun-Tzu, one of the best known military strategists, and his thoughts were influential at this period. Early records indicate that Sun-Tzu lived in the Warring state era and his very famous work The Art of War was influenced by the increasing violence of this era. In contrast to its name, the book does not really focus on war time strategies, but on strategies that would prevent the outbreak of war. The core of the strategy for Sun Tzu is not to defeat the enemy in battle, but to repress him without fighting. Sun Tzu therefore focuses on the pre-war period as the realm for strategy and hence pays particular attention to diplomacy at this stage. Sun-Tzu makes a number of suggestions for the use of diplomacy mostly before the war, but even usable during and after the war, all of which seem to be very important to be a good diplomacy player in international relations. He first advices to attack the enemy’s strategy before attacking the enemy itself. He then mentions indirect methods for manipulating the enemy’s actions in order to keep away the danger of being attacked. Another strategy Sun-Tzu suggests is to be flexible in strategy in regard to changing circumstances (Szykman, 1995).
Ancient China can be categorized under two different periods regarding the political structure of the time. The first is the Warring States Era between 656-221 BCE, characterized by the emergence of sovereign states. It was a period of a balance of a power system, so international relations was based on great power rivalry and ephemeral alliances (Hamilton, 1995:12). The Great Powers had leagues, missions and an organized system of correspondence between their many warring states. It is not surprising that Sun-Tzu, one of the best known military strategists, and his thoughts were influential at this period. Early records indicate that Sun-Tzu lived in the Warring state era and his very famous work The Art of War was influenced by the increasing violence of this era. In contrast to its name, the book does not really focus on war time strategies, but on strategies that would prevent the outbreak of war. The core of the strategy for Sun Tzu is not to defeat the enemy in battle, but to repress him without fighting. Sun Tzu therefore focuses on the pre-war period as the realm for strategy and hence pays particular attention to diplomacy at this stage. Sun-Tzu makes a number of suggestions for the use of diplomacy mostly before the war, but even usable during and after the war, all of which seem to be very important to be a good diplomacy player in international relations. He first advices to attack the enemy’s strategy before attacking the enemy itself. He then mentions indirect methods for manipulating the enemy’s actions in order to keep away the danger of being attacked. Another strategy Sun-Tzu suggests is to be flexible in strategy in regard to changing circumstances (Szykman, 1995).
Soru 14
Which of the following is not one of the six forms foreign policy by Kautilya in ancient India?
Seçenekler
A
Peace
B
War
C
Shows of force
D
Alignment
E
Seeking shelter
Açıklama:
According to Kautilya, war is what defines inter-state relations. Kautilya defined six forms of foreign policy (from Arthshastra 7.1.13 - 18).
According to Kautilya, war is what defines inter-state relations. Kautilya defined six forms of foreign policy (from Arthshastra 7.1.13 - 18).
- Peace: entering into a treaty; when the state is weaker than the enemy, it should make peace.
- War: attacking and doing injury; when the state is stronger than the enemy, it should make war.
- Non alignment: staying quiet; when the state is equal with the enemy and neither is capable of harming the other, the state should stay quiet.
- Seeking shelter: When threatened by a stronger enemy the state should seek protection from another stronger state, somewhat forming an alliance.
- Shows of force: When the state is increasing in capabilities, it should augment and mobilize to prepare for war.
- Double-dealing: When a state seeks help for attacking another state, it resorts to peace and war at the same time with different states.
According to Kautilya, war is what defines inter-state relations. Kautilya defined six forms of foreign policy (from Arthshastra 7.1.13 - 18).
- Peace: entering into a treaty; when the state is weaker than the enemy, it should make peace.
- War: attacking and doing injury; when the state is stronger than the enemy, it should make war.
- Non alignment: staying quiet; when the state is equal with the enemy and neither is capable of harming the other, the state should stay quiet.
- Seeking shelter: When threatened by a stronger enemy the state should seek protection from another stronger state, somewhat forming an alliance.
- Shows of force: When the state is increasing in capabilities, it should augment and mobilize to prepare for war.
- Double-dealing: When a state seeks help for attacking another state, it resorts to peace and war at the same time with different states.
Soru 15
Which of the following is not a characteristics of forming alliances, which is another diplomatic formation as a means of foreign policy in ancient Greece?
Seçenekler
A
Considerable attention was given to the winning of allies
B
They made treaties during the 5th and especially 4th centuries
C
Alliances were founded on the basis of allying for war
D
They formed alliances in case of a threat of war
E
The duration of the alliances were not mainly specified
Açıklama:
Diplomacy remained, for the most part, rudimentary in ancient Greece, but there is no doubt that a pattern had emerged. The structure of the inter-state system caused another diplomatic formation as a means of foreign policy, forming alliances. In this line, considerable attention was given to the winning of allies and making of treaties during the 5th and especially 4th centuries. The duration of the alliances were mainly specified, particularly in the 5th century since alliances were founded on the basis of allying for war. In other words, city-states, aware of their weaknesses in face of each other, formed alliances in case of a threat of war. In the 4th century, alliance treaties began to be specified in duration as for ever, and the reason for this may be the new understanding of inter-state relations that alliances shall be based on peace rather than war (Mosley, 2001: 321-322).
Soru 16
Which of the following is true in terms of the number of the kinds of representatives peculiar to Ancient Greek diplomacy which preferred oral messages?
Seçenekler
A
3
B
4
C
5
D
6
E
7
Açıklama:
Another peculiarity of the ancient Greek diplomacy was that they preferred oral messages to written notes; therefore, there is not a large archive of diplomatic correspondence of ancient Greece. There were three kinds of representatives:
Another peculiarity of the ancient Greek diplomacy was that they preferred oral messages to written notes; therefore, there is not a large archive of diplomatic correspondence of ancient Greece. There were three kinds of representatives:
- angelos: a messenger used for brief and specific missions
- keryx: a herald
- proxenos: a resident consul but the proxenos were citizens of the city in which they resided, not of the city-state that employed them. If a resident representative was needed in another state, then a resident was given the title of proxenos by the state which he represented. In other words, the proxenos looked after the interests of a foreign state while residing in the state of which he was a citizen.
Another peculiarity of the ancient Greek diplomacy was that they preferred oral messages to written notes; therefore, there is not a large archive of diplomatic correspondence of ancient Greece. There were three kinds of representatives:
- angelos: a messenger used for brief and specific missions
- keryx: a herald
- proxenos: a resident consul but the proxenos were citizens of the city in which they resided, not of the city-state that employed them. If a resident representative was needed in another state, then a resident was given the title of proxenos by the state which he represented. In other words, the proxenos looked after the interests of a foreign state while residing in the state of which he was a citizen.
Soru 17
Which of the following can be a major reason for the Roman Empire to contribute little to the development of diplomacy?
Seçenekler
A
Their will to negotiate their policies on others
B
Their will to impose their policies on others
C
For them diplomacy means unimportant for foreign diplomacy
D
Their contribution to diplomacy is much more related to domestic law
E
They persuaded to impose their will
Açıklama:
Considering its longevity and organization, the Roman Empire contributed little to the development of diplomacy. This may be explained by their will to impose their policies on others instead of negotiating. As Nicolson mentioned “…[Romans] they sought to impose their will, rather than to negotiate on a basis of reciprocity” (Nicolson, 2001:14). This, of course, does not mean that diplomacy was unimportant for the Romans. Rather, it had an important place in governing their relations with rival states in Italy and in managing their relations with foreign peoples after establishing their empire. However, as it is widely accepted that the contribution of Romans to diplomacy is much more related to the international law and is represented in the theory, not the practice, of diplomacy.
Soru 18
Which of the following is not a characteristics of the Byzantines diplomacy?
Seçenekler
A
they adapted the practices of dynastic marriages from the Near Eastern civilization
B
they adapted the practices of divide and rule tactics from the Roman Empire
C
They employed military force to achieve their aims rather than diplomacy
D
they adapted the practices of deception and the use of religion
E
they employed a number of tactics, both over and covert to achieve their aims through diplomacy
Açıklama:
Since the rulers of the empire were aware of their military weakness, the Byzantines first adapted the practices of former civilizations and developed their own way of diplomacy with their political and cultural contributions. For example, they adapted the practices of protocol and dynastic marriages from the Near Eastern civilization, oration as a tool for public speaking from Greece, and the divide and rule tactics from the Roman Empire. In this manner the diplomatic methods they exercised were ranging from the, formation of alliances to dynastic marriages, from exploiting the enemy’s weaknesses, to deception and the use of religion. The Byzantines employed a number of tactics, both overt and covert to achieve their aims through diplomacy rather than military force.
Soru 19
Which of the following is not a responsibility of the Bureau of Barbarians, a new institution for diplomatic practice by the Byzantines?
Seçenekler
A
Responsible for the imperial post
B
Responsible for the supervision diplomatic officers
C
Responsible for the reception of foreign envoys
D
Responsible for the external security of the empire (internal)
E
responsible for gathering information from every possible source
Açıklama:
It is therefore common to label Byzantine diplomacy as “war by other means” (Antonucci, 1993: 11). They were unique in their method of involvement in internal affairs of other countries For this aim, the empire initiated a new institution for diplomatic practice, the Bureau of Barbarians, responsible for the imperial post, the supervision of diplomatic officers, and the reception of foreign envoys; and he eventually became the emperor’s chief adviser on foreign affairs. The logothete was also responsible for the internal security of the empire until the 11th century. The Bureau sent envoys on diplomatic missions to barbarian lands in order to gather information from every possible source. This was the main function of it. After the envoy’s return to Byzantium, which took mostly years, the information they had reported were recorded and constituted the essential basis of their knowledge on the weaknesses or strengths of their enemies and/or allies.
Soru 20
Which of the following is a characteristics of Medina Charter?
Seçenekler
A
It was founded through military means by a social contract
B
It was an agreement settling the inter-tribal conflict between Muslims, and pagans
C
It was an agreement settling the inter-tribal conflict between Muslims, and Jews
D
It is a constitution for dispute resolution, a tax system, rights and responsibilities to only Muslims
E
It constituted a free state of a pluralistic community
Açıklama:
Diplomacy in the Islamic world began with the establishment of the first Islamic state in 622; and it was not founded through military means but by a social contract, the Medina Charter. (Khan, 2006). The Charter was an agreement settling the inter-tribal conflict between Muslims, Jews and pagans; and it constituted a free state of a pluralistic community. It is a constitution which provided for dispute resolution, a tax system, rights and responsibilities to both Muslims and non-Muslims.
Soru 21
Which of the following were the earliest practitioners of diplomacy?
Seçenekler
A
Sumerians
B
Akkadians
C
Assyrians
D
Greeks
E
Persians
Açıklama:
Sumerians were the earliest practitioners of diplomacy.
Soru 22
Which of the following was not one of the kingdoms that composed the Great Power Club in the late Bronze Age?
Seçenekler
A
The Kingdom of Hatti
B
The Kingdom of Ebla
C
The Kingdom of Assyria
D
The Kingdom of Egypt
E
The Kingdom of Mittanni
Açıklama:
The Great Power Club was composed of five major kingdoms: the kingdom of Hatti, the kingdom of Mittanni, the kingdom of Assyria, the kingdom of Kassite of Babylon and the kingdom of Egypt.
Soru 23
The Hittites signed the Kadesh Treaty with ...
Which of the following correctly completes the sentence above?
Which of the following correctly completes the sentence above?
Seçenekler
A
The Akkadians
B
The Sumerians
C
The Egyptians
D
The Greeks
E
The Persians
Açıklama:
The Hittites signed the Kadesh Treaty with the Egyptians.
Soru 24
Which of the following is the famous work of Sun-Tzu
Seçenekler
A
Prince
B
Leviathan
C
History of the Peloponnesian War
D
Art of War
E
Wealth of Nations
Açıklama:
The Art of War is the famous work of Sun-Tzu.
Soru 25
I-Peace
II- War
III- Non-alignment
IV- Seeking shelter
V- Shows of force
VI- Double-dealing
According to Kautilya, which of the above are among the six forms of foreign policy?
II- War
III- Non-alignment
IV- Seeking shelter
V- Shows of force
VI- Double-dealing
According to Kautilya, which of the above are among the six forms of foreign policy?
Seçenekler
A
I and II
B
I, II, and III
C
I, II, III and IV
D
I, II, III, IV and V
E
I, II, III, IV, V and VI
Açıklama:
According to Kautilya, six forms of foreign policy are peace, war, non-alignment, seeking shelter, shows of force, and double-dealing.
Soru 26
Which of the following was the author of the book, History of the Peloponnesian War?
Seçenekler
A
Thucydides
B
Kautilya
C
Sun-Tzu
D
Hammurabi
E
Hobbes
Açıklama:
Thucydides was the author of the book, History of the Peloponnesian War.
Soru 27
In ancient Greece, which of the following was a kind of representative that was a messenger used for brief and specific missions?
Seçenekler
A
Keryx
B
Angelos
C
Proxenos
D
Demos
E
Nomos
Açıklama:
Angelos is a kind of representative that was a messenger used for brief and specific missions, in Ancient Greece.
Soru 28
Which of the following was a department of government responsible for foreign relations in the Byzantine Empire?
Seçenekler
A
The Bureau of Barbarians
B
The Bureau of Intelligence
C
The Bureau of Foreign Affairs
D
The Bureau of Empire
E
The Bureau of Foreign States
Açıklama:
The Bureau of Barbarians as a department of government was responsible for foreign relations in the Byzantine Empire.
Soru 29
Which of the following statements about the Medina Charter is not correct?
Seçenekler
A
It was an agreement settling the inter-tribal conflict between Muslims, Jews and pagans.
B
It constituted a free state of a pluralistic community.
C
It is a constitution which provided for dispute resolution, a tax system, rights and
responsibilities to both Muslims and non-Muslims
responsibilities to both Muslims and non-Muslims
D
It is a social contract that founded diplomacy in the first Islamic states
E
It was permission for safe passage and conduct.
Açıklama:
Diplomacy in the Islamic world began with the establishment of the first Islamic state in 622; and it was not founded through military means but by a social contract, the Medina Charter. The Charter was an agreement settling the inter-tribal conflict between Muslims, Jews and pagans; and it constituted a free state of a pluralistic community. It is a constitution which provided for dispute resolution, a tax system, rights and responsibilities to both Muslims and non-Muslims. However, the Aman was permission for safe passage and conduct.
Soru 30
.... consists of countries where the rules of Islam are implemented and Islamic rituals are performed.
Which of the following concepts correctly completes the sentence above?
Which of the following concepts correctly completes the sentence above?
Seçenekler
A
Dar-el Islam
B
Dar-el harp
C
Darulfunun
D
Aman
E
The Medina Charter
Açıklama:
Dar-el Islam consists of countries where the rules of Islam are implemented and Islamic rituals are performed.
Soru 31
Which of the following topics do the Amarna Letters not include?
Seçenekler
A
Strategic-military cooperation
B
Treaty negotiations
C
Natural catastrophes
D
Dynastic marriages
E
Trade regulations
Açıklama:
the Amarna letters contain information about:
• Strategic-military cooperation,
• Treaty negotiations,
• Dynastic marriages,
• Trade regulations
• Strengthening friendly relations
• Negotiating alliances
The correct answer is C.
• Strategic-military cooperation,
• Treaty negotiations,
• Dynastic marriages,
• Trade regulations
• Strengthening friendly relations
• Negotiating alliances
The correct answer is C.
Soru 32
I. to conclude an agreement
II. to develop alliance
III. to gather information about weaknesses
In the early Islamic World, which of the above were among the diplomatic functions?
II. to develop alliance
III. to gather information about weaknesses
In the early Islamic World, which of the above were among the diplomatic functions?
Seçenekler
A
I and II
B
I and III
C
II and III
D
only I
E
I, II, and III
Açıklama:
The function of diplomats was to communicate with other states, to conclude an agreement or alliance which was decided previously, to arrange the exchange of prisoners and the truce, and to announce war. Most certainly, another function of envoys was to gather information about the weaknesses and/or strengths of the host country. The correct answer is E.
Soru 33
In early Islamic World, which time period is named as the Year of Delegation?
Seçenekler
A
629-630
B
630-631
C
631-632
D
632-633
E
633-634
Açıklama:
Between 630 and 631, many delegations came to Medina; and therefore, this period is named as the Year of Delegation. Most of them were representatives of Arab tribes coming to declare their acceptance of Islam; however, as in the Najran case, there were also Christians without an intention to accept the religion, but to conclude an agreement. The correct answer is B.
Soru 34
In the Byzantine Empire, what was the responsibility of the Bureau of Barbarians?
Seçenekler
A
to attack the barbarians
B
to invade the barbarian territory
C
to handle the foreign policy
D
to stop the Balkans' invasion
E
to develop the economy of the empire
Açıklama:
The Byzantines employed a number of tactics, both overt and covert to achieve their aims through diplomacy rather than military force. It is therefore common to label Byzantine diplomacy as “war by other means” (Antonucci, 1993: 11). They were unique in their method of involvement in internal affairs of other countries. For this aim, the empire initiated a new institution for diplomatic practice, the Bureau of Barbarians. The correct answer is C.
Soru 35
What was the main motive in the use of diplomacy for the Byzantine Empire?
Seçenekler
A
to get more prosperous
B
to avoid wars
C
to invade new territories
D
to improve the trade
E
to spread Christianity
Açıklama:
In fact, the main motive in the use of diplomacy for the Byzantine Empire was to avoid war, and all diplomatic practice was devoted to this aim. Therefore, the empire used diplomacy as a means of foreign policy continuously, employing more emphasis on it than military means. The correct answer is B.
Soru 36
What was the main reason behind Byzantine Empire's giving much importance to diplomacy?
Seçenekler
A
It wanted to spread Christianity.
B
It was against wars and killing people.
C
It wanted to create a larger empire.
D
It lacked sufficient military power.
E
It wanted to establish a safe economic zone.
Açıklama:
Diplomacy was a necessity for the Byzantine Empire because it had enemies on all of its borders and there was always a threat of invasion while for a certain time it had limited military power. The military force of the Byzantine Empire never exceeded the number of 140.000. While the threat of invasion came from all quarters, e.g., from Nomadic people to Germanic people, from Slavs to Hungarians and Russians, its internal resources were not enough to keep a military permanently in order to give a military response to these threats. Since the rulers of the empire were aware of their military weakness, they first adapted the practices of former civilizations and developed their own way of diplomacy with their political and cultural contributions. The correct answer is D.
Soru 37
I. religion
II. dynastic marriages
III. divide and rule tactic
Which of the methods above are among the methods Byzantine Emprie used in its diplomacy?
II. dynastic marriages
III. divide and rule tactic
Which of the methods above are among the methods Byzantine Emprie used in its diplomacy?
Seçenekler
A
I.
B
I and II
C
I and III
D
II and III
E
I, II, III
Açıklama:
Since the rulers of the empire were aware of their military weakness, they first adapted the practices of former civilizations and developed their own way of diplomacy with their political and cultural contributions. For example, they adapted the practices of protocol and dynastic marriages from the Near Eastern civilization, oration as a tool for public speaking from Greece, and the divide and rule tactics from the Roman Empire. In this manner the diplomatic methods they exercised were ranging from the, formation of alliances to dynastic marriages, from exploiting the enemy’s weaknesses, to deception and the use of religion. The correct answer is E.
Soru 38
In Ancient Greece, which of the following is the messenger used for brief and specific missions?
Seçenekler
A
keryx
B
proxenos
C
the aman
D
surrogate
E
angelos
Açıklama:
Another peculiarity of the ancient Greek diplomacy was that they preferred oral messages to written notes; therefore, there is not a large archive of diplomatic correspondence of ancient Greece. There were three kinds of representatives: • angelos: a messenger used for brief and specific missions. tHe correct answer is E.
Soru 39
Which is correct about the proxenos in Ancient Greece?
Seçenekler
A
They represented the country they reside in.
B
They resided in foreign countries.
C
They were the citizens of the countries they represented.
D
They represented the country they did not reside in.
E
They represented more than one country.
Açıklama:
Proxenos is a resident consul but the proxenos were citizens of the city in which they resided, not of the city-state that employed them. If a resident representative was needed in another state, then a resident was given the title of proxenos by the state which he represented. In other words, the proxenos looked after the interests of a foreign state while residing in the state of which he was a citizen. The correct answer is D.
Soru 40
"The enemy of my enemy is my friend." Who does that statement belong to?
Seçenekler
A
Kautilya
B
Sun-Tzu
C
Homer
D
Amarna
E
Magadha
Açıklama:
The Enemy of My Enemy is my Friend Kautilya is most famous for outlining the foreign policy principle of “the enemy of my enemy is my friend” which can clearly be seen in his following words; “Your neighbor is not a candidate for alliance, only enemies of a neighboring country shall be allies of the country” The correct answer is A.
Soru 41
When the very beginning of diplomacy is taken into account, which of the following states the main purpose of diplomacy?
Seçenekler
A
To start wars
B
To receive gifts
C
To provide peace
D
To rule communities
E
To develop civilizations
Açıklama:
It is widely accepted, as Hamilton mentions, that the beginnings of diplomacy occurred when a human being decided for the first time that hearing a message is better than eating the messenger. At this point, with the decision to assure the safety of a messenger, the primitive rules of diplomacy began to emerge. Messengers were sent from one tribe to another mainly to make peace in a rudimentary way, based on custom and even taboo. These earliest types of diplomacy in primitive societies took the shape of exchanging gifts, in a sense, to buy peace. The correct answer is Choice C.
Soru 42
Which of the following is true about ancient diplomacy?
Seçenekler
A
It started in ancient Greece.
B
It was first put into practice in Roman Empire.
C
It is completely different from the diplomacy as it is understood today.
D
Persian was used as the lingua franca of diplomacy until the Akhadian hegemony was established in the region.
E
The system was mainly based on that of the Sumerians in the south, Babylonian and Akadian in the center and Assyrians in the north.
Açıklama:
Although Greece is accepted as the birthplace of Western civilization, diplomacy was not born in Greece in contrast to what is widely thought. Diplomacy was born thousands of years before ancient Greece committed to diplomacy as a civilization. Nevertheless, the word “diplomacy” is itself borrowed from ancient Greek. It is derived from the word “diploma” meaning two fold. In the Roman Empire, the word was used to describe the passes, comparable to the modern day passport, which were stamped on metal plates. This word was later extended to cover other metallic documents, especially those embodying arrangements with foreign communities
The first system of city-states occurred in Mesopotamia between the 4th and the first millennium. The system was mainly based on that of the Sumerians in the south, Babylonian and Akadian in the center and Assyrians in the north.
Sumerians were the earliest practitioners of diplomacy (3000-2370 BCE). The diplomatic tradition emerged from this site mainly because the Sumerians were the civilization which invented writing sometime in the 4th millennium BCE. In the meantime, Sumeria was the site of the first urban communities consisted of complex social, economic and political structures each of which was ruled by an independent King.
The features of the first exchange systems of organized polities resemble in many ways the diplomacy as we now understand. They were conducted by envoys in a formal framework of law; and they were based upon the principles of reciprocity. With the emergence of the state system, the methods of diplomacy were transformed from primitive courses into trade agreements, dynastic marriages, and military alliances.
Diplomacy was used by Sumerians with a motivation to end conflicts through the conventional method of sending messengers with the messages written on clay tablets in cuneiform. Sumerian was used as the lingua franca of diplomacy until the Akhadian hegemony was established in the region.
The correct answer is Choice E.
The first system of city-states occurred in Mesopotamia between the 4th and the first millennium. The system was mainly based on that of the Sumerians in the south, Babylonian and Akadian in the center and Assyrians in the north.
Sumerians were the earliest practitioners of diplomacy (3000-2370 BCE). The diplomatic tradition emerged from this site mainly because the Sumerians were the civilization which invented writing sometime in the 4th millennium BCE. In the meantime, Sumeria was the site of the first urban communities consisted of complex social, economic and political structures each of which was ruled by an independent King.
The features of the first exchange systems of organized polities resemble in many ways the diplomacy as we now understand. They were conducted by envoys in a formal framework of law; and they were based upon the principles of reciprocity. With the emergence of the state system, the methods of diplomacy were transformed from primitive courses into trade agreements, dynastic marriages, and military alliances.
Diplomacy was used by Sumerians with a motivation to end conflicts through the conventional method of sending messengers with the messages written on clay tablets in cuneiform. Sumerian was used as the lingua franca of diplomacy until the Akhadian hegemony was established in the region.
The correct answer is Choice E.
Soru 43
- It was directed to the king’s envoy.
- The letter was written by the king himself.
- The style of language was different from modern diplomacy.
Seçenekler
A
I
B
II
C
III
D
I-III
E
II-III
Açıklama:
The first known diplomatic letter was a message sent by the King of Ebla (in northern Syria) to the kingdom of Hamazi (north of Iran today), which shows a similar style of language and contend of modern diplomacy. This letter provides a clear evidence of the existence of a well performing mechanism, in which both sides knew the rules. The letter was not written by the king himself, but through the voice of an official, and was not directed to the Hamazi King but to his envoy (Podany, 2010: 27). Since the Ebla region had priority in trade, diplomacy was mainly a part of their trade relations, the reflection of which could also be seen in the Ebla letter. The correct answer is Choice A.
Soru 44
- Diplomatic envoys were chosen from among low-level officials.
- They were free to journey across boundaries even in times of crisis.
- All of them were regarded explicitly as the king’s personal representatives.
Seçenekler
A
I
B
II
C
III
D
I-II
E
I-III
Açıklama:
Envoys were appointed for specific missions with a specific set of instructions; and the type of the diplomatic envoys varied according to the circumstances. They can be simple messengers who carry royal mail, but they can also be plenipotentiary ministers. Diplomatic envoys were chosen from among senior officials of administration. Their primary function involved coordinating diplomatic efforts. Some of them were regarded explicitly as the king’s personal representatives. Diplomatic envoys were protected by their diplomatic status and they were free to journey across boundaries even in times of crisis. In other words, they had a kind of “diplomatic immunity” which was evident in many documents that found in Mari and later in other archives. Even to attest their status, diplomats seemed to have a kind of “diplomatic passport”, on which the name of the holder, the description of his delegation and his destination were written. The correct answer is Choice B.
Soru 45
Which of the following is true about Hittite diplomacy?
Seçenekler
A
It was a poorly developed system.
B
The treaties were written in a structured pattern.
C
Amarna diplomacy emerged after Hittite diplomacy.
D
Its formulization was similar to the previous diplomacies.
E
The treaties, which it was mainly based on, were conducted just between the kings.
Açıklama:
A few centuries after Amarna diplomacy, another diplomatic system emerged between Hittite and Egypt. Hittite diplomacy was also a well-developed system, embracing all preceding diplomatic tools and rules of conduct. The nuance of the Hittite system was its different formulization which based mainly on treaties. These treaties were concluded either between kings or the Hittite King and his vassals. They were written in a structured pattern and they included the information about the Hittite King, conditions that brought the parties into forming an alliance, reciprocal obligations, a list of witnesses and the rules to be applied in case of disloyalty. The correct answer is Choice B.
Soru 46
- He lived in the Warring state era.
- The focus of his very famous work The Art of War was on war time strategies.
- The core of the strategy for Sun Tzu is to defeat the enemy in battle.
Seçenekler
A
I
B
II
C
III
D
I-II
E
II-III
Açıklama:
Ancient China can be categorized under two different periods regarding the political structure of the time. The first is the Warring States Era between 656-221 BCE, characterized by the emergence of sovereign states. It was a period of a balance of a power system, so international relations was based on great power rivalry and ephemeral alliances. The Great Powers had leagues, missions and an organized system of correspondence between their many warring states. Diplomacy was based on bilateral relations and missions related to fleeting alliances including maneuvers, secrecy and bribery Chinese states had no permanent friends and enemies; therefore, their strategies were ruthless but still in an equilibrium. It is not surprising that Sun-Tzu, one of the best known military strategists, and his thoughts were influential at this period. Early records indicate that Sun-Tzu lived in the Warring state era and his very famous work The Art of War was influenced by the increasing violence of this era. In contrast to its name, the book does not really focus on war time strategies, but on strategies that would prevent the outbreak of war. The core of the strategy for Sun Tzu is not to defeat the enemy in battle, but to repress him without fighting. Sun Tzu therefore focuses on the pre-war period as the realm for strategy and hence pays particular attention to diplomacy at this stage. The correct answer is Choice A.
Soru 47
When Kautilya’s theory is considered, which of the folloing forms of foreign policy is the one that is defined as “When a state seeks help for attacking another state, it resorts to peace and war at the same time with different states.”?
Seçenekler
A
War
B
Peace
C
Shows of force
D
Non-alignment
E
Double-dealing
Açıklama:
Kautilya defined the state system as a ruthless realistic system which was determined by self-interest, compatible with the structure of the existing state system of India in that time. India at this period was mostly composed of a number of small independent states, being in a rivalry with each other with the exception of the Magadha kingdom. Kautilya played an important role in the fall of the Magadha kingdom and the rise to power of the Mauryan dynasty. In fact, Kautiya was a political realist; and the key theme of his theory represented in his book was war. According to Kautilya, war is what defines inter-state relations. Kautilya defined six forms of foreign policy.
- Peace: entering into a treaty; when the state is weaker than the enemy, it should make peace.
- War: attacking and doing injury; when the state is stronger than the enemy, it should make war.
- Non alignment: staying quiet; when the state is equal with the enemy and neither is capable of harming the other, the state should stay quiet.
- Seeking shelter: When threatened by a stronger enemy the state should seek protection from another stronger state, somewhat forming an alliance.
- Shows of force: When the state is increasing in capabilities, it should augment and mobilize resources to prepare for war.
- Double-dealing: When a state seeks help for attacking another state, it resorts to peace and war at the same time with different states. The correct answer is Choice E.
Soru 48
- Forging alliances
- Declaration of war and peace
- Gathering intelligence overtly, and also spying
Seçenekler
A
I
B
I-II
C
I-III
D
II-III
E
I-II-III
Açıklama:
From Kautilya’s work, along with other valuable sources, we can derive that in Ancient India, diplomatic dealings were well-developed and structured, particularly in regard to diplomats and the roles they played in diplomacy. There were detailed rules of diplomatic immunities and privileges of the inauguration and termination of diplomatic missions and also of the selection and duties of a diplomat. In Ancient India, the functions of diplomats, or envoys as was named at this time, were threefold:
- Declaration of war and peace
- Forging alliances
- Gathering intelligence overtly, and also spying.
Soru 49
Which of the following is true about the Byzantine Empire?
Seçenekler
A
It had a powerful and crowded army.
B
The empire initiated a new department which was responsible for foreign relations.
C
The main motive in the use of diplomacy for the Byzantine Empire was to start war.
D
The rulers of the empire were not influenced by the former civilizations while creating their diplomacy.
E
In the empire, diplomatic representatives from other countries were allowed to have a conversation with the emperor.
Açıklama:
Diplomacy was a necessity for the Byzantine Empire because it had enemies on all of its borders and there was always a threat of invasion while for a certain time it had limited military power. The military force of the Byzantine Empire never exceeded the number of 140.000. While the threat of invasion came from all quarters, e.g., from Nomadic people to Germanic people, from Slavs to Hungarians and Russians, its internal resources were not enough to keep a military permanently in order to give a military response to these threats. Since the rulers of the empire were aware of their military weakness, they first adapted the practices of former civilizations and developed their own way of diplomacy with their political and cultural contributions. For example, they adapted the practices of protocol and dynastic marriages from the Near Eastern civilization, oration as a tool for public speaking from Greece, and the divide and rule tactics from the Roman Empire. In this manner the diplomatic methods they exercised were ranging from the, formation of alliances to dynastic marriages, from exploiting the enemy’s weaknesses, to deception and the use of religion. for a certain time it had limited military power. The military force of the Byzantine Empire never exceeded the number of 140.000. While the threat of invasion came from all quarters, e.g., from Nomadic people to Germanic people, from Slavs to Hungarians and Russians, its internal resources were not enough to keep a military permanently in order to give a military response to these threats. Since the rulers of the empire were aware of their military weakness, they first adapted the practices of former civilizations and developed their own way of diplomacy with their political and cultural contributions. For example, they adapted the practices of protocol and dynastic marriages from the Near Eastern civilization, oration as a tool for public speaking from Greece, and the divide and rule tactics from the Roman Empire. In this manner the diplomatic methods they exercised were ranging from the, formation of alliances to dynastic marriages, from exploiting the enemy’s weaknesses, to deception and the use of religion. In fact, the main motive in the use of diplomacy for the Byzantine Empire was to avoid war, and all diplomatic practice was devoted to this aim. Therefore, the empire used diplomacy as a means of foreign policy continuously, employing more emphasis on it than military means. The Byzantines employed a number of tactics, both overt and covert to achieve their aims through diplomacy rather than military force. It is therefore common to label Byzantine diplomacy as “war by other means” (Antonucci, 1993: 11). They were unique in their method of involvement in internal affairs of other countries. For this aim, the empire initiated a new institution for diplomatic practice, the Bureau of Barbarians. The Bureau of Barbarians as a department of government was responsible for foreign relations, primarily with the barbarians living on the Balkan Peninsula. The correct answer is Choice B.
Soru 50
- It had a complex function.
- It was founded through military means.
- The motives for diplomatic practice were similar to other ages and civilizations.
Seçenekler
A
I
B
II
C
III
D
I-II
E
I-III
Açıklama:
Diplomacy in the Islamic world began with the establishment of the first Islamic state in 622; and it was not founded through military means but by a social contract, the Medina Charter. The function of diplomats was to communicate with other states, to conclude an agreement or alliance which was decided previously, to arrange the exchange of prisoners and the truce, and to announce war. Most certainly, another function of envoys was to gather information about the weaknesses and/or strengths of the host country. The function of diplomacy in these early years was at the most basic level since the strength of the state in the absence of at least an equal power did not raise the need to a more complex function for diplomacy. Diplomatic contact between Islamic or Arab, Byzantine and also Latin rulers were frequent in the Middle Ages. The motives for diplomatic practice were similar to other ages and civilizations: political concern regarding peace and war, economic or commercial motives and definitely information gathering. Emissaries played the most important role in this vein; and it can be said that diplomatic envoys were great travelers in the Middle Ages. As Drocourt stated, they usually spent more time travelling than negotiating because of the distance between the Arab region and Constantinople or the whole Western part of Christendom. The correct answer is Choice C.
Soru 51
Which of the following is not one of the first state-like polities with government?
Seçenekler
A
civilization,
B
law,
C
taxation,
D
education systems,
E
literature,
Açıklama:
These first state-like polities with government, law, taxation, education systems and literature which were formed in Mesopotamia and the Eastern Mediterranean provide the great tradition of diplomacy in the ancient world (Cohen, 2001). Doğru cevap " A " dır.
Soru 52
Which of the following wasn't found in Mari cuneiform archives?
Seçenekler
A
more than 20 thousand letters,
B
brotherhood,
C
legal documents,
D
diplomatic correspondences,
E
treaties,
Açıklama:
One of the earliest and most informative resources regarding our knowledge on Near East diplomacy is the Mari cuneiform archives, which consist of more than 20 thousand letters, legal documents, diplomatic correspondences, and treaties written on clay tablets. Doğru cevap " B " dir.
Soru 53
Which of the following is one that contains information in the Amarna letters?
Seçenekler
A
Diplomatic communication
B
Agreement
C
Negotiating alliances
D
Diplomatic envoys
E
Diplomatic immunity
Açıklama:
At the core of this diplomatic relationship, we find the Amarna letters which
contain information about:
• Strategic-military cooperation,
• Treaty negotiations,
• Dynastic marriages,
• Trade regulations,
• Strengthening friendly relations,
• Negotiating alliances. Doğru cevap " C " dir.
contain information about:
• Strategic-military cooperation,
• Treaty negotiations,
• Dynastic marriages,
• Trade regulations,
• Strengthening friendly relations,
• Negotiating alliances. Doğru cevap " C " dir.
Soru 54
" ..................... is best known for the first peace treaty signed in 1270 BCE between Egyptian King Ramses II and Hittite King Hattusili III after the battle of Kadesh in Syria. "
Which of the following correctly completes the sentence above?
Which of the following correctly completes the sentence above?
Seçenekler
A
Diplomatic relationship
B
Great Power
C
Egyptian vassal
D
Hittite diplomacy
E
Dynastic marriage
Açıklama:
Hittite diplomacy is best known for the first peace treaty signed in 1270 BCE between Egyptian King Ramses II and Hittite King Hattusili III after the battle of Kadesh in Syria. The Kadesh treaty was signed to end the long war between the Hittites and the Egyptians, which lasted for nearly two centuries for the domination over Syrian region. Doğru cevap " D " dir.
Soru 55
Which of the following is the correct civilization where we could look for the origins of diplomacy as a system?
Seçenekler
A
Ancient India,
B
The Amphycthonyc League,
C
Ancient Greece,
D
Forging alliance,
E
Ancient China,
Açıklama:
Ancient China is another civilization where we could look for the origins of diplomacy as a system. The first records of Chinese diplomacy date from
the 1st millennium BCE. Ancient China can be categorized under two different periods regarding the political structure of the time. Doğru cevap " E " dir.
the 1st millennium BCE. Ancient China can be categorized under two different periods regarding the political structure of the time. Doğru cevap " E " dir.
Soru 56
" When a state seeks help for attacking another state, it resorts to peace and war at the same time with different states. "
Which of the following is correct definition for the sentence above?
Which of the following is correct definition for the sentence above?
Seçenekler
A
Double-dealing
B
Non alignment
C
Seeking shelter
D
Shows of force
E
Peace
Açıklama:
Double-dealing: When a state seeks help for attacking another state, it resorts to peace and war at the same time with different states. Doğru cevap " A " dır.
Soru 57
Which of the following is related to this date " 221 BCE "?
Seçenekler
A
The Mauryan Empire dominated ancient India until ......... .
B
The tradition of equal diplomacy ended with Qin dynasty’s unification of China in ..... .
C
Alexander the Great conquered its northern regions in ...... .
D
The Rajput Kingdoms gained control and dominated the region by .... .
E
The Assyrian state emerged and reached its zenith during ..... .
Açıklama:
The tradition of equal diplomacy ended with Qin dynasty’s unification of China in 221 BCE. With the new coercive universal empire, China’s diplomatic dealing with the foreign world lessened to level of defense and trade issues. Doğru cevap " B " dir.
Soru 58
" a messenger used for brief and specific missions "
Which of the following is the correct definition of the sentence above?
Which of the following is the correct definition of the sentence above?
Seçenekler
A
proxenos
B
keryx
C
angelos
D
envoy
E
member
Açıklama:
Another peculiarity of the ancient Greek diplomacy was that they preferred oral messages to written notes; therefore, there is not a large archive of diplomatic correspondence of ancient Greece. There were three kinds of representatives:
• angelos: a messenger used for brief and specific missions
• keryx: a herald
• proxenos: a resident consul but the proxenos were citizens of the city in which they resided, not of the city-state that employed them. Doğru cevap " C " dir.
• angelos: a messenger used for brief and specific missions
• keryx: a herald
• proxenos: a resident consul but the proxenos were citizens of the city in which they resided, not of the city-state that employed them. Doğru cevap " C " dir.
Soru 59
Which of the following is one of the most important reasons for the empire’ slongevity?
Seçenekler
A
an important strategy
B
all of its borders
C
the use of surrogates
D
its use of diplomacy
E
department of government
Açıklama:
The Byzantine Empire originally was the eastern part of the Roman Empire; and it was one of the longest lasting political entities in history, from 330 CE until the fall of Constantinople in 1453. One of the most important reasons for the empire’ slongevity was its use of diplomacy. Doğru cevap " D " dir.
Soru 60
" ........................... were great travelers in the Middle Ages."
Which of the following correctly completes the sentence above?
Which of the following correctly completes the sentence above?
Seçenekler
A
Christian scholars
B
Non-Muslims
C
People of that
D
The Najran delegates
E
Diplomatic envoys
Açıklama:
Diplomatic contact between Islamic or Arab, Byzantine and also Latin rulers were frequent in the Middle Ages. The motives for diplomatic practice were similar to other ages and civilizations: political concern regarding peace and war, economic or commercial motives and definitely information gathering. Emissaries played the most important role in this vein; and it can be said that diplomatic envoys were great travelers in the Middle Ages. Doğru cevap " E " dir.
Ünite 3
Soru 1
"A period of time starting from ancient world to emergence of Renaissance especially in Italian peninsula"
What is the term used for the time period described above?
What is the term used for the time period described above?
Seçenekler
A
Old World
B
Renaissance
C
Old War
D
Old Diplomacy
E
Permanent Diplomacy
Açıklama:
The term “Old World” here refers to a period of time starting from ancient world to emergence of Renaissance especially in Italian peninsula. The political authorities of the “Old World” were far from being as organized as modern state structures.
Soru 2
What is the legal term which refers to the continuity of agreements between parties and bindingness of the clauses for both parties regardless of a change of a government or ruler?
Seçenekler
A
Ancient diplomacy
B
Pacta sunt servanda
C
Respublica Christiana
D
Nuncius
E
Renaissance
Açıklama:
Pacta sunt servanda is a legal term in Latin, which refers to the continuity of agreements between parties and bindingness of the clauses for both parties regardless of a change of a government or ruler. It is one of the ordering principles of modern international law and diplomacy.
Respublica Christiana was how this collective identity called, although it never turned into an acquired state structure.
Most significant and novel concept of medieval Europe is the term nuncius. A nuncius is the person in charge who is appointed by the ruler as the voice of the principal in another political entity.
Respublica Christiana was how this collective identity called, although it never turned into an acquired state structure.
Most significant and novel concept of medieval Europe is the term nuncius. A nuncius is the person in charge who is appointed by the ruler as the voice of the principal in another political entity.
Soru 3
Which of the following is among the factors contributed to the emergence of the early institutions of modern democracy in the Renaissance Italy?
Seçenekler
A
The superiority of small Italian city states over each other
B
Preferring conflicts and war over consolidation of diplomacy
C
Sharing the same language for diplomatic progress
D
Lack of linguistic unity among the states
E
Each states' having strong military resources in the Peninsula
Açıklama:
The common language that is shared by all these small city states served as another facilitator for diplomatic progress in the region. Despite the lack of a political unity among the city states, there was a linguistic unity among them. Italian, being the lingua franca in the Peninsula, was accepted as the common language for any form of correspondence among the city states. This became an asset for the facilitation of dialogue and prepared the ground for diplomatic interactions to become an effective tool in the interstate affairs.
Soru 4
Which of the following is NOT among the major Italian City-States?
Seçenekler
A
Florence
B
Milan
C
Rome
D
Siena
E
Venice
Açıklama:
Siena is not among the five major city-states.
Soru 5
Which of the following is FALSE about "Peace of Westphalia"?
Seçenekler
A
It was signed in 1648 after 30 Years' Wars.
B
It introduced the modern notion of sovereignty to interstate relalations.
C
It is accepted as the beginning of the modern state system.
D
It established the functional equality among German principalities.
E
It helped sectarian/religious orientations to gain importance.
Açıklama:
The Peace of Westphalia is signed in 1648 after 30 Years’ Wars between protestant and catholic German principalities. There is a consensus that the Peace of Westphalia introduced the modern notion of sovereignty to interstate relations, therefore, is accepted as the beginning of the modern state system. It established the functional equality among German principalities regardless of their religious/sectarian orientation, size and power.
Soru 6
Which of the following countries was the one initiating a specific department responsible from the foreign policy?
Seçenekler
A
France
B
The United States
C
Italy
D
Germany
E
Britain
Açıklama:
France was again the first country which initiated a specific department responsible from the foreign policy. In Ancien Régime, Henry III initiated a department and gave the sole responsibility in foreign policy to a specific department under the government as early as 1589. Yet, it should be noted that this department was far from a ministerial structure compared to modern ministries of foreign affairs. In fact, religious affairs were the dominant theme in the agenda of this department, as it was in contact mainly with the authorities in Vatican. In fact, almost all of the personnel working in this department were coming from a clergy background. Famous Cardinal Richelieu made certain reforms in 1630s to restructure this department in a more organized manner. However, the emergence of a ministry as a modern department of foreign affairs had to wait until the overthrow of the Ancien Régime. Still, France was earlier than other European states to initiate a ministry whose sole responsibility was to conduct foreign policy.
Soru 7
Which of the following is NOT among the duties of specific ministries of foreign affairs?
Seçenekler
A
Policy making
B
Supporting the missions abroad
C
Coordinating foreign relations
D
Dealing with foreign diplomats hosted in the home country
E
Recruiting staff for mission in the home country
Açıklama:
What were the duties of these specific ministries of foreign affairs?
Although this had varied from case to case, within the political context of early 20th century, the tasks of foreign ministries started to become alike in many examples of the world.
Firstly, policy making mission was given to this ministry.
Secondly, these ministries were also given the task of staffing and supporting the missions abroad.
Thirdly, they started to coordinated foreign relations especially after the Great War (WWI).
Fourthly, dealing with foreign diplomats hosted in the home country was also assigned to these ministries.
Although this had varied from case to case, within the political context of early 20th century, the tasks of foreign ministries started to become alike in many examples of the world.
Firstly, policy making mission was given to this ministry.
Secondly, these ministries were also given the task of staffing and supporting the missions abroad.
Thirdly, they started to coordinated foreign relations especially after the Great War (WWI).
Fourthly, dealing with foreign diplomats hosted in the home country was also assigned to these ministries.
Soru 8
Which of the following is a characteristics of "new policy"?
Seçenekler
A
Foreign policy is applicable in all domestic and international environments regardless of its being simple or complex.
B
Foreign policy results from the work of international actors and groups only.
C
Foreign policy issues are often linked and delinked, reflecting the strength of various parties and their particular concerns.
D
The “stuff” of foreign policy derives from issues of foreign relations leaving domestic politics aside.
E
Foreign policy analysis needs to be single level and single faceted to confront the sources and nature of foreign policy.
Açıklama:
New foreign policy” has the characteristics mentioned below:
• “Foreign policy is made and conducted in complex domestic and international environments.
• Foreign policy results from the work of coalitions of interested domestic and international actors and groups.
• Foreign policy issues are often linked and delinked, reflecting the strength of various parties and their particular concerns.
• The “stuff” of foreign policy derives from issues of domestic politics as well as foreign relations.
• Foreign policy analysis needs to be multilevel and multifaceted in order to confront the complicated sources and nature of foreign policy.
• “Foreign policy is made and conducted in complex domestic and international environments.
• Foreign policy results from the work of coalitions of interested domestic and international actors and groups.
• Foreign policy issues are often linked and delinked, reflecting the strength of various parties and their particular concerns.
• The “stuff” of foreign policy derives from issues of domestic politics as well as foreign relations.
• Foreign policy analysis needs to be multilevel and multifaceted in order to confront the complicated sources and nature of foreign policy.
Soru 9
Which of the following states the reason why new diplomacy included the practices of certain interest groups, non-governmental organization, transnational solidarity movements and even ordinary individuals?
Seçenekler
A
The international pressure felt over diplomatic issues
B
The introduction of the Internet
C
The tendency to collaborate more with others
D
The new rules to be followed in foreign policies
E
Complex nature of political issues
Açıklama:
New diplomacy also included the practices of certain interest groups, non-governmental organizations, transnational solidarity movements and even ordinary individuals. Especially with the introduction of the Internet, diplomacy is no longer considered as a practice that diplomats conduct, but all these above-mentioned actors started to pursue their own agendas and take part in the game of diplomacy. Track II diplomacy, meaning the diplomatic conduct run by non-state actors and influential non-diplomatic individuals, became a new diplomatic tool recognized by states as well.
Soru 10
Which of the following is the term referring to "non-conventional diplomacy conducted by not only diplomatic crews, but also by influential individuals (such as artists, authors or celebrities)"?
Seçenekler
A
Ancien Régime
B
New Diplomacy
C
Diplomatic Immunity
D
Track II Diplomacy
E
Old Diplomacy
Açıklama:
Track II diplomacy is a term that refers to non-conventional diplomacy conducted by not only diplomatic crews, but also by influential individuals (such as artists, authors or celebrities). Track II diplomatic practices usually take place during mediation efforts, formation of peace missions and campaign for more universal causes instead of a political agenda of a specific state. In other words, Track II diplomacy is a non-official effort to facilitate the official diplomatic context towards a cooperative solution.
Soru 11
Which of the following is not a characteristics of “Old World” diplomacy?
Seçenekler
A
The diplomatic practices were operated through institutionalized structures
B
The ancient cities were mainly constituted of some local authorities
C
These local authorities resemble medieval empires in terms of their organization
D
The sates lacked the permanent institutions and their borders were not well defined
E
The diplomatic practices took place among feudal lords, chieftains and tribal leaders
Açıklama:
The political authorities of the “Old World” were far from being as organized as modern state structures. The main difference between ancient states and modern state structures was lying in the capacity of centralization. The ancient states in the “Old World” were mainly constituted of some local authorities which control a piece of land militarily and economically. These local authorities were brought together under more general state structures borders of which reach out broader territories. Although they resemble medieval empires in terms of their organization, these states lacked the permanent institutions, mainly built upon decentralized structures, and their borders were not very well-defined. What we call “ancient diplomacy” today took place both within and among these states of the “Old World”. The diplomatic practices within an ancient state took place among the local authorities such as feudal lords, chieftains and tribal leaders. These practices vary from mutual visits to trade and security related agreements between them. Although we consider these practices as the forerunners of diplomacy in the ancient world, it should be noted that they were not operated through institutionalized structures.
Soru 12
Which of the following is not a result of Peace of Lodi in 1454?
Seçenekler
A
It brought a certain degree of peace and stability to the region
B
It accelerated the emergence of diplomatic customs as a legitimate practice in all Europe
C
It institutionalized the functional equality among Italian city states
D
It provided a consensus in which they are all treated equivalent to each other
E
Diplomatic interaction between city states started after the mutual acceptance of equivalence
Açıklama:
After long lasting fights, Peace of Lodi in 1454 brought a certain degree of peace and stability to the region (Mattingly, 1955: 77). Most noteworthy aspect of Peace of Lodi was that it institutionalized the functional equality among Italian city states. In other words, regardless of their size, power and location, Italian city states came to a consensus in which they are all treated and assumed equivalent to each other. At this point, it should be noted that the principle of functional equality can be considered as the main constituting element of modern diplomacy. In fact, diplomatic interaction between two political entities only started after the mutual acceptance of equivalency by both parties in the medieval and Renaissance Europe. In this regard, the institutionalization of equality through Peace of Lodi accelerated the emergence of diplomatic customs as a legitimate practice in Italian Peninsula.
Soru 13
Which of the following is a result of Peace of Westphalia, signed in 1648, for British diplomacy?
Seçenekler
A
It did not build resident and constant diplomatic missions in European capitals
B
It came forward as a country which kept most active contact with the Muslim world
C
British envoys were sent to the states of the continental Europe after this peace
D
It was late to institutionalize the resident ambassadors compared to other primary European powers
E
Resident ambassadors in European countries became a British diplomatic custom mainly before 1648
Açıklama:
options A,B, and D are related with France.
With the Peace of Westphalia, German principalities institutionalized the notion of resident ambassador just like Italian city states did in the 16th century. In the beginning, most of the principals sent their envoys to Brandenburg-Prussia and other great powers in the German world. In the longer run, keeping a permanent diplomatic mission in other countries spread all over German principalities. Principals preferred to have resident diplomatic missions mostly in farer principalities, as closer or neighboring principalities were accessible through short trips.
The British also copied and internalized these diplomatic customs. British envoys were sent to the states of the continental Europe mainly after the Peace of Westphalia. Britain, being one of the actors in the peace talks, did not withdraw its committee from Münster and Osnabrück, two German-speaking cities where peace talks took place, and distributed this team later to Sweden, France, Brandenburg-Prussia and Denmark. Although several British diplomatic missions were sent to other countries earlier, resident ambassadors in European countries became a British diplomatic custom mainly after 1648.
France can be noted as one exception to this. Although France did have envoys and resident diplomatic missions in several countries as early as the beginnings of 16th century, it did not follow the general European fashion to build resident and constant diplomatic missions in European capitals. Yet, France has come forward as the country which kept most active contact with the Muslim world. French envoys were sent to Ottoman Empire in 1535 and Safavid Empire (present day Iran) in 1600s (Black, 2010: 54). Still, France was late to institutionalize the resident ambassadors compared to other primary European powers. Yet, it is also worthy to note that once the French developed their own diplomatic system, it was admired by other European states as it was first fully-developed system of diplomacy (Berridge, 2010: 103).
With the Peace of Westphalia, German principalities institutionalized the notion of resident ambassador just like Italian city states did in the 16th century. In the beginning, most of the principals sent their envoys to Brandenburg-Prussia and other great powers in the German world. In the longer run, keeping a permanent diplomatic mission in other countries spread all over German principalities. Principals preferred to have resident diplomatic missions mostly in farer principalities, as closer or neighboring principalities were accessible through short trips.
The British also copied and internalized these diplomatic customs. British envoys were sent to the states of the continental Europe mainly after the Peace of Westphalia. Britain, being one of the actors in the peace talks, did not withdraw its committee from Münster and Osnabrück, two German-speaking cities where peace talks took place, and distributed this team later to Sweden, France, Brandenburg-Prussia and Denmark. Although several British diplomatic missions were sent to other countries earlier, resident ambassadors in European countries became a British diplomatic custom mainly after 1648.
France can be noted as one exception to this. Although France did have envoys and resident diplomatic missions in several countries as early as the beginnings of 16th century, it did not follow the general European fashion to build resident and constant diplomatic missions in European capitals. Yet, France has come forward as the country which kept most active contact with the Muslim world. French envoys were sent to Ottoman Empire in 1535 and Safavid Empire (present day Iran) in 1600s (Black, 2010: 54). Still, France was late to institutionalize the resident ambassadors compared to other primary European powers. Yet, it is also worthy to note that once the French developed their own diplomatic system, it was admired by other European states as it was first fully-developed system of diplomacy (Berridge, 2010: 103).
Soru 14
Which of the following institutionalized and legalized diplomatic immunity?
Seçenekler
A
Peace of Westphalia, signed in 1648
B
Peace of Lodi in 1454
C
Congress of Vienna in 1814-1815
D
Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations in 1961
E
French Revolution in 1789
Açıklama:
In this regard, immunity was guaranteed multilaterally to assure the credibility and authenticity of the information delivered by the envoys. In other words, the immunity granted to the diplomats and envoys aimed at making the diplomatic crew feel comfortable so that they would not manipulate the message to be delivered in order to guarantee their own security. This diplomatic custom was later institutionalized and legalized in 1961 Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, yet it remained as a respected principle mainly after the middle 17th century.
Soru 15
What was the result of Napoleonic Wars in terms of distributing dangerous ideologies throughout the Europe?
Seçenekler
A
Capitalism
B
Socialism
C
Feminism
D
Communism
E
Nationalism
Açıklama:
Napoleon Bonaparte came forward as a charismatic figure in the French politics and became the president of the Republic. Yet, he abolished the Republic and declared himself as the Emperor. These developments in the French domestic politics disquieted the monarchs of the Europe deeply as Napoleon put a solid challenge to the very idea of conservative European monarchies. It could be seen ironic that Napoleon himself abolished the Republic and turned himself into a monarch, yet he imposed nationalist republics in the states that he controlled through Napoleonic Wars. In other words, Napoleon appeared as the distributer of two very dangerous ideologies throughout the Europe: republicanism and nationalism.
Soru 16
In the post-Congress of Vienna term in many European states, a specific recruitment for diplomatic missions started to take place first where?
Seçenekler
A
In Habsburgs
B
In France
C
In Britain
D
In Italy
E
In Spain
Açıklama:
Therefore, a specific recruitment for diplomatic missions started to take place first in France, later in Habsburgs and Britain. After the recruitment, the diplomatic staff were also subject to additional training. Some training were provided to senior and experienced staff such as ambassadors for them to be able to recruit their own staff such as administrative attachés.
Soru 17
Which of the following was the first country which initiated a specific department responsible from the foreign policy?
Seçenekler
A
Habsburgs
B
Britain
C
France
D
Italy
E
Spain
Açıklama:
Today, almost all the states in the world have a specific ministry in charge of determining and conducting foreign policy. Yet, this was not the in case. Modern foreign ministries originated mainly from European states, and it has not been even 250 years that the first foreign ministry was founded under government structure (Berridge, 2010: 5). As diplomacy was professionalized and acknowledged as a field which requires special expertise and training, the states of Europe also recognized the need for a specific ministry under the government which is solely responsible from the conduct of foreign policy. France was again the first country which initiated a specific department responsible from the foreign policy. In Ancien Régime, Henry III initiated a department and gave the sole responsibility in foreign policy to a specific department under the government as early as 1589 (Berridge, 2010: 6).
Soru 18
In terms of foreign affairs, Turkey uses which of the following title?
Seçenekler
A
Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade
B
Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Foreign Trade and Development Aid
C
Department of State
D
Ministry of Foreign Affairs
E
Department of Foreign Affairs
Açıklama:
Finally, it should be noted that these ministries may use different titles in different countries. For example, Australian version includes the term ‘trade’, and uses ‘Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, while Belgian version has even a broader title: ‘Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Foreign Trade and Development Aid.’ A simple title of ‘Ministry of Foreign Affairs’ is used by many countries such as Turkey, Italy, Japan, China, whereas more specific titles were also adapted by some other countries like Senegalese ministry, ‘Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the African Union and Senegalese Abroad’, like South African version.
Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (Australia)
Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Foreign Trade and Development Aid (Belgium)
Department of State (USA)
Department of Foreign Affairs (US 1781)
Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (Australia)
Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Foreign Trade and Development Aid (Belgium)
Department of State (USA)
Department of Foreign Affairs (US 1781)
Soru 19
Which of the following is not a characteristics of “new foreign policy” suggested by Neack?
Seçenekler
A
It results from the work of coalitions of interested domestic and international actors and groups
B
Its issues are often linked and delinked, reflecting the strength of various parties
C
The “stuff” of foreign policy derives from issues of domestic politics as well as foreign relations
D
Foreign policy analysis needs to be multilevel and multifaceted
E
It is made and conducted in simple domestic and international environments
Açıklama:
As noted above, it would be an exaggeration to argue that the major principles of permanent diplomacy changed due to the end of the Cold War. Yet, it would also be flawed to neglect the fact that certain significant developments gained momentum. Firstly, the nature of foreign policy shifted from a pure state-centric to a more multi-actor and multi-factorial ground. Neack (2008) calls this new form of foreign policy as “new foreign policy” and argues that new foreign policy has the characteristics mentioned below:
As noted above, it would be an exaggeration to argue that the major principles of permanent diplomacy changed due to the end of the Cold War. Yet, it would also be flawed to neglect the fact that certain significant developments gained momentum. Firstly, the nature of foreign policy shifted from a pure state-centric to a more multi-actor and multi-factorial ground. Neack (2008) calls this new form of foreign policy as “new foreign policy” and argues that new foreign policy has the characteristics mentioned below:
- “Foreign policy is made and conducted in complex domestic and international environments.
- Foreign policy results from the work of coalitions of interested domestic and international actors and groups.
- Foreign policy issues are often linked and delinked, reflecting the strength of various parties and their particular concerns.
- The “stuff” of foreign policy derives from issues of domestic politics as well as foreign relations.
- Foreign
As noted above, it would be an exaggeration to argue that the major principles of permanent diplomacy changed due to the end of the Cold War. Yet, it would also be flawed to neglect the fact that certain significant developments gained momentum. Firstly, the nature of foreign policy shifted from a pure state-centric to a more multi-actor and multi-factorial ground. Neack (2008) calls this new form of foreign policy as “new foreign policy” and argues that new foreign policy has the characteristics mentioned below:
- “Foreign policy is made and conducted in complex domestic and international environments.
- Foreign policy results from the work of coalitions of interested domestic and international actors and groups.
- Foreign policy issues are often linked and delinked, reflecting the strength of various parties and their particular concerns.
- The “stuff” of foreign policy derives from issues of domestic politics as well as foreign relations.
- Foreign policy analysis needs to be multilevel and multifaceted in order to confront the complicated sources and nature of foreign policy.” (Neack, 2008: 6).
Soru 20
Which of the following is a type of international system in which there are two major powers that are significantly superior to other actors in terms of distribution of power?
Seçenekler
A
Unipolar international system
B
Bipolar international system
C
Multipolar international system
D
Anarchical international system
E
Self-help international system
Açıklama:
Bipolar international system is a type of international system in which there are two major powers that are significantly superior to other actors in terms of distribution of power.
Soru 21
Which of the following years refers to the Interwar Period?
Seçenekler
A
Between 1918 and 1939
B
Between 1939 and 1945
C
Between 1945 and 1960
D
Between 1960 and 1980
E
Between 1980 and 1989
Açıklama:
The Interwar Period refers to the specific period between 1918 and 1939.
Soru 22
Most noteworthy aspect of .... was that it institutionalized the functional equality among Italian city states.
Which of the following options correctly completes the sentence above?
Which of the following options correctly completes the sentence above?
Seçenekler
A
Peace of Westphalia
B
Peace of Utrecth
C
Peace of Lodi
D
Paris Peace Treaty
E
Versailles Treaty
Açıklama:
Most noteworthy aspect of Peace of Lodi was that it institutionalized the functional equality among Italian city states.
Soru 23
Which of the following is accepted as the beginning of the modern state system?
Seçenekler
A
Peace of Lodi
B
Peace of Westphalia
C
Peace of Utrecht
D
The Congress of Vienna
E
The Treaty of Versailles
Açıklama:
Peace of Westphalia is accepted as the beginning of the modern state system.
Soru 24
After the Congress of Vienna, which of the following was a model followed by all European powers including the Ottoman Empire?
Seçenekler
A
Old diplomacy
B
Track II diplomacy
C
Permanent diplomacy
D
New diplomacy
E
Contemporary diplomacy
Açıklama:
After the Congress of Vienna, permanent diplomacy was a model followed by all European powers including the Ottoman Empire.
Soru 25
I- Professionalization
II- Recruitment
III- Administrative structuration and hierarchy
IV- Emergence of Ministries of Foreign Affairs
Which of the above are among the important developments that showed the transition to permanent diplomacy?
II- Recruitment
III- Administrative structuration and hierarchy
IV- Emergence of Ministries of Foreign Affairs
Which of the above are among the important developments that showed the transition to permanent diplomacy?
Seçenekler
A
Only I
B
I and II
C
II and III
D
I, II and III
E
I, II, III and IV
Açıklama:
Three main important developments can be noted for the full transition to permanent diplomacy: professionalization and recruitment, administrative structuration and emergence of ministries.
Soru 26
Which of the following concepts refers to non-conventional diplomacy conducted by not only diplomatic crews but also by influential individuals such as artists, authors, or celebrities?
Seçenekler
A
Old diplomacy
B
Permanent diplomacy
C
New diplomacy
D
Track II diplomacy
E
Preventive diplomacy
Açıklama:
Track II diplomacy refers to non-conventional diplomacy conducted by not only diplomatic crews but also by influential individuals such as artists, authors or celebrities.
Soru 27
Which of the following was the first country which initiated a specific department responsible from the foreign policy?
Seçenekler
A
France
B
Russia
C
Britain
D
Austria
E
Ottoman Empire
Açıklama:
France was the first country which initiated a specific department responsible from the foreign policy.
Soru 28
According to Neack, which of the following is not one of the characteristics of new foreign policy?
Seçenekler
A
Foreign policy is made and conducted in complex domestic and international environments.
B
Foreign policy results from the work of coalitions of interested domestic and international actors and groups
C
The nature of foreign policy is purely state-centric.
D
The “stuff” of foreign policy derives from issues of domestic politics as well as foreign relations
E
Foreign policy analysis needs to be multilevel and multifaceted in order to confront the complicated sources and nature of foreign policy.
Açıklama:
The nature of new foreign policy shifted from a pure state-centric to a more multi-actor and multi-factorial ground so that it is not purely state-centric.
Soru 29
I- policymaking II- staffing and supporting abroad missions III- coordinating foreign relations IV- dealing with foreign diplomats hosted in the home country Which of the above are among the tasks of foreign ministries?
Seçenekler
A
Only I
B
I and II
C
II and III
D
I, II and III
E
I, II, III and IV
Açıklama:
Policymaking, staffing and supporting abroad missions, coordinating foreign relations, and dealing with foreign diplomats hosted in the home country are among the tasks of foreign ministries.
Soru 30
In diplomatic history, which years does the term “Interwar Period” refer to?
Seçenekler
A
1900 and 1930
B
1907 and 1914
C
1907 and 1938
D
1918 and 1939
E
1920 and 1945
Açıklama:
In diplomatic history, the term “Interwar Period” refers to the specific period between 1918 and 1939. The correct answer is D.
Soru 31
What does the Latin term, Pacta sunt servanda refer to?
Seçenekler
A
the continuity of agreements between parties for both parties regardless of a change of a government or ruler
B
rearrangement of agreements when a government of rules one one of the parties changes.
C
maintaining the safety of messengers and diplomats during negotiations
D
being generous and giving gifts to the messengers of the other countries as a sing of friendship
E
declaring war on the other party when the interests of the country id threatened or in danger
Açıklama:
Pacta sunt servanda Pacta sunt servanda is a legal term in Latin, which refers to the continuity of agreements between parties and bindingness of the clauses for both parties regardless of a change of a government or ruler. It is one of the ordering principles of modern international law and diplomacy. For more information, see Wehberg, (1959). The correct answer is A.
Soru 32
Which of the following is a typical example for unipolar system?
Seçenekler
A
the USA in the early 1990s
B
Italy during the Renaissance
C
France after the World War I
D
Germany at the start of the 20th century
E
the UK duirn gthe World Waw II
Açıklama:
Unipolar system: This is a type of international system in which one hegemon significantly dominates the other actors within the system. A typical example of such an international system is the period of early 1990s. The United States remained as the only superpower after the dissolution of the Soviet Union and dominated the international system. The correct answer is A.
Soru 33
Which of the following is a typical example for bipolar system?
Seçenekler
A
the dominance of the USA in the early 1990s
B
the rise of the Italian city states during the Renaissance
C
the ruling of the UK at the beginning of the 20th century
D
the influence of Germany after the World War II
E
the USA and Soviet Union appeared as superpowers during the Cold War
Açıklama:
Bipolar system: In bipolar international system, there are two major powers that are significantly superior to other actors in terms of distribution of power. A perfect example of such an international system is the Cold War term in which the United States and Soviet Union appeared as the two superpowers. The correct answer is E.
Soru 34
Which of the following is the term used to refer to the person in charge who is appointed by the ruler as the voice of the principal in another political entity in medieval Europa?
Seçenekler
A
Nuncius
B
messenger of the Respublica Christiana
C
Brotherhood Diplomat
D
messenger of faith
E
Resident ambassador
Açıklama:
Most significant and novel concept of medieval Europe is the term nuncius. A nuncius is the person in charge who is appointed by the ruler as the voice of the principal in another political entity. The correct answer is A.
Soru 35
I. Italian city states came to a consensus in which they are all treated and assumed equivalent to each other. II. Despite the lack of a political unity among the city states, there was a linguistic unity among them. III. Other coercive political tools such as war were much more costly and ineffective. Which of the above are the factors that contributed to institutions of modern democracy in the Renaissance Italy?
Seçenekler
A
I
B
II
C
I and II
D
II and III
E
I, II, and III
Açıklama:
It can be asked why in the Renaissance Italy, but not somewhere else, did the early institutions of modern democracy emerge. Three important factors can be noted. Firstly, the political equation among small Italian city states facilitated the consolidation of diplomacy as a preferred tool for solution of the problems in the Peninsula. Italian city states were in fact feudal units controlled by certain dynasties. ...In other words, regardless of their size, power and location, Italian city states came to a consensus in which they are all treated and assumed equivalent to each other. At this point, it should be noted that the principle of functional equality can be considered as the main constituting element of modern diplomacy. Secondly, the common language that is shared by all these small city states served as another facilitator for diplomatic progress in the region. Despite the lack of a political unity among the city states, there was a linguistic unity among them. Italian, being the lingua franca in the Peninsula, was accepted as the common language for any form of correspondence among the city states. Thirdly, the small scale political organization due to over-fragmented political structure in the Peninsula rendered some other coercive political tools such as war much more costly and ineffective. Italian city states were quite small in terms of their size and capacities. The correct answer is E.
Soru 36
The diplomacy in Renaissance Italy is different from the diplomacy in the ancient world because the modern Italian diplomacy ______.
Which of the following completes the statement above?
Which of the following completes the statement above?
Seçenekler
A
emerged among small city states
B
guaranteed the safety of the messengers
C
underestimated the importance of trade
D
focused on continuity and constant contact
E
used a coercive strategy
Açıklama:
As elaborated earlier, diplomatic practices and interaction did exist among political entities even in ancient times elsewhere in the world. Yet, the content of these diplomatic practices were far from being a model for modern diplomatic customs. The biggest obstacle for cultivation of a systematic diplomatic custom was, of course, the issue of continuity. Diplomatic interactions of the ancient world were built upon quite an intermittent structure and shaped in an issue-specific manner. They did play a role in the formation of customs in the field of trade and crystallization of the borders. Yet, the modern diplomacy, which required continuity and constant contact, emerged in the Renaissance Italy. The content of the diplomatic practices in the Renaissance Italy focused mainly on long term alliances, customs union, and defense against the intervention that would potentially come from non-Italian Europe. The correct answer is D.
Soru 37
Which of the following first introduced the notion of a resident ambassador?
Seçenekler
A
France
B
Ancient Greek city states
C
Italian city states
D
England
E
Germany
Açıklama:
In accordance with the aim of keeping constant correspondence, we see that Italian city states were first to invent the very notion of a resident ambassador. Envoys were sent to foreign countries before Italian city states indeed. Yet, they were usually sent on a specific quest or to deliver a letter from the principal to its counterpart. Italian city states in the Renaissance, on the other hand, institutionalized the practice of having a resident ambassador in other states. The correct answer is C.
Soru 38
In some cases the envoys lost their contact with the home country and internalized the identity of the host country after some years of stay. Yet, this was quite problematic for the country of origin in terms of having a trustworthy relationship with their own envoys. Which of the following is not among the measurements taken by European States to prevent this situation?
Seçenekler
A
Envoys, ambassadors and accompanying crew were selected from experienced and reliable civil servants.
B
The diplomatic staff and crew were banned form receiving gifts from the host countries.
C
The diplomatic staff were also subject to additional training.
D
Diplomats were authorized to develop instant policies as a reaction to sudden developments.
E
Diplomats were allocated generous budgets for the accommodation and expenses of the diplomatic missions.
Açıklama:
To this aim, European states followed a threefold strategy. Firstly, they allocated generous budgets for the accommodation and expenses of the diplomatic missions sent to other countries. In the 18th century, envoys, ambassadors and accompanying crew were selected from experienced and reliable civil servants closer to the ruler. After the recruitment, the diplomatic staff were also subject to additional training. Some training were provided to senior and experienced staff. Thirdly, as different from the 18th century resident ambassadors, the ambassadors of permanent diplomacy in the 19th century were not only seen as the envoys of their ruler. They were also authorized to develop instant policies as a reaction to sudden developments and crisis situations. The correct answer is B.
Soru 39
What is the term that refers to the idea that diplomats are not susceptible to lawsuits and diplomatic missions such that embassies are protected against the intervention of the host country?
Seçenekler
A
diplomatic crisis
B
ancien regime
C
diplomatic immunity
D
track II diplomacy
E
pacta sund servanda
Açıklama:
Diplomatic immunity is a universal principle of modern diplomacy which refers to legal immunity of diplomats and diplomatic missions. According to diplomatic immunity principle, diplomats are not susceptible to lawsuits and diplomatic missions such that embassies are immune from the intervention of the host country. Diplomatic immunity has been an important custom in the transition to permanent diplomacy. The correct answer is C.
Ünite 4
Soru 1
Which of the following is a characteristics of Ad Hoc Diplomacy?
Seçenekler
A
States were sending temporary representatives to each other
B
States were sending permanent representatives to each other
C
States were sending permanent missionaries to each other
D
The ruler were sending permanent representatives to solve the problems
E
States began to adapt professional and permanent institutions and instruments
Açıklama:
Ad Hoc Diplomacy
It was the diplomatic system adapted by the states before the establishment of modern, permanent diplomacy in the 14th and 15th centuries. States were sending temporary representatives or missionaries to each other for specific missions. For the solution of problems, signing treaties, declaring their war or peace decisions, etc. rulers were sending their representatives. After the formation of modern diplomacy, states began to adapt professional and permanent institutions and instruments. The Ottoman Empire used ad hoc diplomacy until the end of 18th century. The reign of Selim III, who was closely following the developments in Europe, was a turning point in the adaptation of modern diplomacy. Especially with Mahmud II, the Ottoman Empire began to adapt the rules and institutions of modern diplomacy despite some shortcomings.
It was the diplomatic system adapted by the states before the establishment of modern, permanent diplomacy in the 14th and 15th centuries. States were sending temporary representatives or missionaries to each other for specific missions. For the solution of problems, signing treaties, declaring their war or peace decisions, etc. rulers were sending their representatives. After the formation of modern diplomacy, states began to adapt professional and permanent institutions and instruments. The Ottoman Empire used ad hoc diplomacy until the end of 18th century. The reign of Selim III, who was closely following the developments in Europe, was a turning point in the adaptation of modern diplomacy. Especially with Mahmud II, the Ottoman Empire began to adapt the rules and institutions of modern diplomacy despite some shortcomings.
Soru 2
Which of the following is not a characteristics of Ottoman diplomacy?
Seçenekler
A
They did not want to make concessions to “inferior” states
B
They adapted the rules of modern diplomacy until early 1790s
C
There was no room in the Ottoman diplomacy for relations on the basis of equality
D
It carried out its diplomatic relations on the basis of superior-inferior dichotomy
E
It did not take part in diplomatic relations due to the sense of superiority up until the 18th century
Açıklama:
It was one of the dominant powers until the end of 17th century and carried out its diplomatic relations on the basis of superior-inferior dichotomy. They carried out their diplomatic relations on the basis of unilateralism and there was no room in the Ottoman diplomacy for relations on the basis of equality and mutuality. Therefore, they did not adapt the rules of modern diplomacy until early 1790s because they did not want to make concessions to “inferior” states. However, as opposed to the general view that the Ottomans did not take part in diplomatic relations due to the sense of superiority up until the 18th century, they attached great importance to their diplomatic relations from the beginning. The basic tools of Ottoman diplomacy were Âmans (mercies) and capitulations which reflected the unilateral nature of Ottoman diplomacy and started to be granted to Venetians as early as the reign of Mehmed II (Fatih) in the 15th century. In the heydays of the Ottoman rule, Suleyman I (Kanuni) granted capitulations to France. Initially, capitulations were economic, political and legal privileges granted to foreign states and subjects. However, as time passed and the empire began to decline, they turned into burdens on the Ottoman Empire hard to carry.
Soru 3
Which of the following is the country that Ottoman Empire did not conduct diplomatic relations with in the period between 15th and 18th centuries?
Seçenekler
A
Venice
B
Poland
C
Greece
D
Iran
E
Hungary
Açıklama:
Although it was an expansionist power with imperial claims, the Ottoman Empire did not neglect diplomacy in the period between 15th and 18th centuries and conducted diplomatic relations with Venice, Genoa, Poland, Russia, Iran, Hungary, Austria, France, Transylvania, Bogdan, Walachia, Ragusa, Georgia, Algeria, Tripoli, Morocco and Marrakech.
Soru 4
When Ottoman rulers are considered, which of the following is not a true statement for the relations with the European or Christian states?
Seçenekler
A
Ottoman rulers were more pragmatic than argued
B
They established close relations with the Byzantine Empire
C
The Ottoman system was ruled not only by religious laws, but also by customary laws
D
Ottomans had bilateral relations with the European or Christian states
E
Their legal system provided flexibility and pragmatism to the policies of the empire
Açıklama:
Nevertheless, the Ottoman rulers attached great importance to diplomatic relations despite unilateral nature of these relations in order to be a part of world system and power struggle. As opposed to the general view that the Ottomans did not have bilateral relations with the European or Christian states because the Quran orders not establishing relations with infidels and fighting against them (Tuncer, 11), Ottoman rulers were more pragmatic than argued. From the beginning, they established close relations not only with Beyliks (tribes) in Anatolia, but also with the Byzantine Empire. Through inter-tribal or inter-state marriages, they consolidated their power and expanded their territories. Therefore, the Ottoman Empire cannot be regarded as an entity solely ruled by strict Islamic laws, rather it was also influenced by customary laws and local customs. Ottoman Sultans like Mehmed II issued qanunnames (books of law) in accordance with the Turkish state tradition empowered rulers to make laws, so the Ottoman system was not only ruled by religious laws, but also by customary laws. Such a legal system provided flexibility and pragmatism to the policies of the empire. (Yurdusev, 14-15)
Soru 5
Which of the following was the first state that opened an embassy in İstanbul right after the conquest?
Seçenekler
A
Poland
B
Russia
C
France
D
Austria
E
Venice
Açıklama:
Institutionally, Ottoman sultans were sending agents or envoys to carry out their specific missions in the ad hoc diplomacy period. Although they did not establish permanent embassies in foreign states before the 18th century, the Ottomans allowed foreign states to establish diplomatic missions in the empire. Venice was the first state opened an embassy in Istanbul right after the conquest. It was followed by Poland (1475), Russia (1497), France (1525), Austria (1528), the Great Britain (1583) and the Netherlands (1612).
Soru 6
Which of the following is not a reason for agents or envoys to be sent to foreign states by ottoman Sultans in the ad hoc diplomacy period?
Seçenekler
A
For granting capitulations
B
for signing peace treaties
C
for signing trade agreements
D
for signing peace proposals
E
for carrying out peace negotiations
Açıklama:
In the ad hoc diplomacy period, agents or envoys were sent to foreign states for different purposes. They were assigned by the sultan for signing peace treaties or trade agreements, peace proposals, carrying out peace negotiations or mediating between two states, negotiating the clauses of treaties, establishing or consolidating friendly relations, collecting debts of Ottomans, learning the opinions and policies of the states about the empire, declaring the change of throne, giving presents of the sultan, delivering letters from the sultan, declaring an Ottoman victory, congratulating a new monarch on behalf of the sultan, joining coronations of European monarchs, inviting European monarchs to certain ceremonies and claiming taxes. (Tuncer,12)
Soru 7
Which of the following is a characteristics of “special diplomatic letters”, one of the types of diplomatic letters carried by Ottoman envoys?
Seçenekler
A
They were about describing social life and military power
B
They were only about the developments and results of the mission
C
They were about describing culture and education
D
They were about development level of the receiving country
E
They were about industry level of the receiving country
Açıklama:
Ottoman envoys assigned by the sultan to carry out specific diplomatic activities were evaluating their missions in the reports called Sefaretname (Diplomatic Letters). Diplomatic letters were rich sources for the Ottoman diplomacy and diplomatic missions. The number of these diplomatic letters were about forty and the oldest diplomatic letter belongs to Kara Mehmet Pasha sent to Vienna to ameliorate relations between the empire and Austria after Vasvar Treaty had been signed in 1664. There were two types of diplomatic letters: special ones and general ones. Special diplomatic letters were only about the developments and results of the mission carried out by the envoy. On the other hand, in general diplomatic letters, Ottoman envoys were describing social life, military power, culture, education, industry and development level of the receiving country.
Soru 8
Where was the first Ottoman Embassy established in 1793?
Seçenekler
A
Paris
B
Vienna
C
London
D
Venice
E
Florence
Açıklama:
Therefore, the first Ottoman Embassy was established in London in 1793 and this was a turning point in Ottoman diplomacy. Being aware of the loss of dominance and superiority over the European powers, which had become more powerful starting with colonization and continued with the French Revolution and the Industrial Revolution, Ottoman rulers used all instruments and institutions of diplomacy.
Soru 9
Which of the following was the major ally of the Ottoman Empire Until the reign of Abdulhamid II (1876-1909)?
Seçenekler
A
Russia
B
Germany
C
France
D
Great Britain
E
Belgium
Açıklama:
Until the reign of Abdulhamid II (1876-1909) the major ally of the Ottoman Empire was the Great Britain.
Soru 10
When was Tercüme Odası (Translation Room) established?
Seçenekler
A
1817
B
1818
C
1819
D
1820
E
1821
Açıklama:
However, with Serbian and Greek uprisings during the reign of Mahmud II, training Turkish-Muslim translators and diplomats became a priority for the Ottomans. To this end, Tercüme Odası (Translation Room) was established in 1821 and Muslim-Turkish translators began to be trained in this institution and they replaced Dragomans who were the translators during the ad hoc period.
Soru 11
In the Ottoman Empire, who was responsible for the translation of reports, documents and treaties?
Seçenekler
A
Âman
B
the ulema
C
Reis-ül Küttap
D
Ahidname
E
Dragoman
Açıklama:
Dragomans were responsible for the translation of reports, documents and treaties in the Ottoman Empire especially in the classical age. They were integral parts of the Ottoman diplomacy from the beginning. Dragomans were selected among the people who knew foreign languages. The correct answer is E.
Soru 12
Initially, German, Polish, Greek and Armenian translators were working in the translation office. After which Ottoman Sultan, Turkish people were favoured in this institution?
Seçenekler
A
Mehhmet II
B
Selim II
C
Kanuni
D
Mahmud II
E
Abdulhamit
Açıklama:
Initially, German, Polish, Greek and Armenian translators were working in the office, whereas after Mahmud II, the empire favored Turkish people in this institution. The correct answer is D.
Soru 13
Who was the first Ottoman Sultan to grant capitulations?
Seçenekler
A
Mehmet II
B
Kanuni
C
Yavuz Sultan Selim
D
Murat IV
E
Abdulhamit
Açıklama:
For the first time in Ottoman history, Mehmed II granted capitulations to Venetians in 1454 on the basis of existing custom which was derived from the capitulatory agreement between the Byzantine Empire and Venice. The correct answer is A.
Soru 14
Which of the following is not correct about the capitulations given by the Ottoman Empire.
Seçenekler
A
They provided privileges and rights the receiving country.
B
They capitulations on the basis of Âman system.
C
They were given to Muslim citizens and states.
D
Capitulations were political, economic and legal privileges.
E
They were first granted to Venice.
Açıklama:
On the other hand, Ottoman rulers granted certain privileges and rights to non-Muslim states and citizens called capitulations on the basis of Âman system. Capitulations were political, economic and legal privileges benefitted by non-Muslims. As early as the fifteenth century, Mehmed II granted capitulations to Venice. However, this policy was a part of power struggle game. The correct answer is C.
Soru 15
When was the first Ottoman embassy open in London?
Seçenekler
A
1763
B
1773
C
1783
D
1793
E
1803
Açıklama:
The first Ottoman Embassy was established in London in 1793. The correct answer is D.
Soru 16
Which Ottoman Sultan started the modernization and professionalization of Ottoman diplomacy?
Seçenekler
A
Abdulhamit
B
Vahdettin
C
Selim III
D
Mehmet II
E
Murat VI
Açıklama:
Modernization and professionalization of Ottoman diplomacy started with Selim III, who was a visionary sultan seeking for modernization and Westernization of Ottoman system in all aspects such as the military, bureaucracy and economy. Therefore, for Selim III, it was necessary for the Ottoman Empire to establish permanent diplomatic missions in European capitals because the sultan was aware that in comparison to the European state system, the Ottoman system was backward. The correct answer is C.
Soru 17
Why were translation rooms established in the Ottoman Empire?
Seçenekler
A
to hire more translators
B
to help Greek translators learnTurkish
C
to translate the old Arabic books
D
to train Muslim-Turkish trasnlators
E
to improve the efficiency of dragomans
Açıklama:
To this end, Tercüme Odası (Translation Room) was established in 1821 and Muslim-Turkish translators began to be trained in this institution and they replaced Dragomans who were the translators during the ad hoc period. The correct answer is D.
Soru 18
Which Ottoman Sultan established the Hariciye Nezareti?
Seçenekler
A
Mehmet II
B
Selim III
C
Kanuni
D
Murat VI
E
Mahmut II
Açıklama:
Therefore, Mahmud II established Hariciye Nezareti (Minister of Foreign Affairs) in 1836 as the first step of the establishment of a modern and professional body for conducting foreign relations. (Tuncer, 30-31) It can be regarded as the beginning of today’s Turkish Ministry of Foreign Affairs. The correct answer is E.
Soru 19
I. French Revolution
II. Industrial Revolution
III. Weakening of Ottoman Empire's Power
Which of the situations above had an impact on Ottoman Empire to shift form ad hoc diplomacy to permanent diplomacy?
II. Industrial Revolution
III. Weakening of Ottoman Empire's Power
Which of the situations above had an impact on Ottoman Empire to shift form ad hoc diplomacy to permanent diplomacy?
Seçenekler
A
I
B
II
C
I and III
D
II and III
E
I, II, and III
Açıklama:
Being aware of the loss of dominance and superiority over the European powers, which had become more powerful starting with colonization and continued with the French Revolution and the Industrial Revolution, Ottoman rulers used all instruments and institutions of diplomacy. The Industrial Revolution also played a serious role in the erosion of Ottoman power. With the accumulation of capital and boom in economic production, Western states hegemonized the international relations. Te correct answer is E.
Soru 20
Who was the person responsible for controlling duties of secretaries in the diplomatic correspondence?
Seçenekler
A
Amens
B
Dragomans
C
Envoys
D
Reis-ül Küttap
E
Defterdar
Açıklama:
In the late Ottoman period, modernization of diplomatic service was followed by the professionalization of ministry of foreign affairs. Before the 19th century, Reis-ül Küttap (Head of Secretaries) was mainly responsible for diplomatic correspondence. This body was established during the reign of Suleyman I and working subject to the Grand Vizier. The mission of Reis-ül Küttap in the state apparatus was to control duties of secretaries in the diplomatic correspondence. The correct answer is D.
Soru 21
Until when did the Ottoman Empire use ad hoc diplomacy?
Seçenekler
A
Until the end of 15th century
B
Until the end of 16th century
C
Until the end of 17th century
D
Until the end of 18th century
E
Until the end of 19th century
Açıklama:
The Ottoman Empire used ad hoc diplomacy until the end of 18th century. The reign of Selim III, who was closely following the developments in Europe, was a turning point in the adaptation of modern diplomacy. Especially with Mahmud II, the Ottoman Empire began to adapt the rules and institutions of modern diplomacy despite some shortcomings.
Soru 22
Which of the following is not a characteristics of diplomatic relation of the Ottoman Empire?
Seçenekler
A
They adapted the rules of modern diplomacy until early 1790s
B
There was no room in the Ottoman diplomacy for relations on the basis of equality and mutuality
C
They carried out its diplomatic relations on the basis of superior-inferior dichotomy
D
They carried out their diplomatic relations on the basis of unilateralism
E
They attached great importance to their diplomatic relations from the beginning
Açıklama:
The Ottoman Empire was one of the dominant powers until the end of 17th century and carried out its diplomatic relations on the basis of superior-inferior dichotomy. They carried out their diplomatic relations on the basis of unilateralism and there was no room in the Ottoman diplomacy for relations on the basis of equality and mutuality. Therefore, they did not adapt the rules of modern diplomacy until early 1790s because they did not want to make concessions to “inferior” states. However, as opposed to the general view that the Ottomans did not take part in diplomatic relations due to the sense of superiority up until the 18th century, they attached great importance to their diplomatic relations from the beginning.
Soru 23
Which of the following is not a country with which the Ottoman Empire conducted diplomatic relations in the period between 15th and 18th centuries?
Seçenekler
A
Austria
B
France
C
Great Britain
D
Hungary
E
Bogdan
Açıklama:
Although it was an expansionist power with imperial claims, the Ottoman Empire did not neglect diplomacy in the period between 15th and 18th centuries and conducted diplomatic relations with Venice, Genoa, Poland, Russia, Iran, Hungary, Austria, France, Transylvania, Bogdan, Walachia, Ragusa, Georgia, Algeria, Tripoli, Morocco and Marrakech.
Soru 24
Which of the following shows the pragmatism of Ottomans in their diplomatic relations?
Seçenekler
A
The sense of superiority and powerfulness were important factors
B
The Ottoman rulers made long-lasting agreements with non- Muslims
C
The basic motive of Ottoman sultans was to expand their imperial power
D
Ottomans did not have bilateral relations with the European or Christian states
E
Ottoman diplomacy was heavily influenced by the strict laws of Islam
Açıklama:
Despite their unilateral nature, the Ottoman rulers made long-lasting agreements with non- Muslims. These treaties were renewed regularly so there was an intention to establish state of peace except several wars in the Ottoman foreign policy. For example, Bayezid II signed an agreement with Pope Innocent VIII. In this treaty, the Sultan and the Pope agreed on the capturing of his brother Cem in France rather than sending him to the foes of the Ottomans in return for the control of Jerusalem by the French King after it had been taken by the Ottoman Empire from Mamluks. (Yurdusev, 16) The deal between the Sultan and the Pope shows the pragmatism of Ottomans in their diplomatic relations.
The main objective of the Ottoman rulers through conducting these pragmatic relations with foreign states was to be an influential actor in the European system. The Sultans carried out cautious diplomatic relations with the European states with considering balance of power in the European states system. Thus, Yurdusev argued that this diplomatic pragmatism triggered, to some extent, the formation of nation states in Europe. On the other hand, as the Ottomans became a powerful empire and a part of this power game, the European states had to take the Ottomans into consideration while making their decisions and implementing their policies, so from time to time they allied with the Ottoman sultan against each other. Therefore, the role of the Ottoman Empire in the European states system facilitated the preservation of status quo. (Yurdusev, 22) Especially in the 16th and 17th centuries, the Ottoman rulers supported the English and Dutch against the Habsburgs, the main enemy of the Ottomans at that time, because these states were the forerunners of European resistance against Habsburgs’ dominance in the continent. On the other hand, the Ottoman rulers benefitted from the religious rivalry in Europe and they supported Protestants and Calvinists against the Catholics because this religious split in the continent was an important tool in the war against Habsburgs. The Ottoman pressure on the Habsburgs triggered the spread of Protestantism in Europe. (Yurdusev, 23)
The main objective of the Ottoman rulers through conducting these pragmatic relations with foreign states was to be an influential actor in the European system. The Sultans carried out cautious diplomatic relations with the European states with considering balance of power in the European states system. Thus, Yurdusev argued that this diplomatic pragmatism triggered, to some extent, the formation of nation states in Europe. On the other hand, as the Ottomans became a powerful empire and a part of this power game, the European states had to take the Ottomans into consideration while making their decisions and implementing their policies, so from time to time they allied with the Ottoman sultan against each other. Therefore, the role of the Ottoman Empire in the European states system facilitated the preservation of status quo. (Yurdusev, 22) Especially in the 16th and 17th centuries, the Ottoman rulers supported the English and Dutch against the Habsburgs, the main enemy of the Ottomans at that time, because these states were the forerunners of European resistance against Habsburgs’ dominance in the continent. On the other hand, the Ottoman rulers benefitted from the religious rivalry in Europe and they supported Protestants and Calvinists against the Catholics because this religious split in the continent was an important tool in the war against Habsburgs. The Ottoman pressure on the Habsburgs triggered the spread of Protestantism in Europe. (Yurdusev, 23)
Soru 25
Which of the following is a characteristics of Âman system, the privilege or immunity granted by the sultan to foreigners or non-Muslims?
Seçenekler
A
They were permanent agreements
B
Its relations with foreign states were based on mutuality
C
Its relations with foreign states were not based on unilaterality
D
It was not used as a leverage to expand its territories and reach its objectives
E
They were temporary agreements
Açıklama:
Since the establishment of the Ottoman Empire, diplomacy was a significant tool for inter-tribal and inter-state relations. As a part of diplomatic strategy, Ottoman sultans married daughters of chiefs of other tribes or monarchs of the Byzantine Empire. Main objectives of this strategy were developing friendly relations with other states and expanding territories through obtaining new lands as dowry. On the other hand, in the heydays of the Ottoman Empire, its relations with foreign states were not based on mutuality, but on unilaterality. This system was known as the Âman (Mercy) System. Âman was the privilege or immunity granted by the sultan to foreigners or non-Muslims. This system which protected the rights of non-Muslims within the boundaries of the empire was unilaterally granted by the Ottomans. (Turan, 26)
In addition, Âman system constituted the basis of treaties and agreements signed between the Ottomans and foreign states. In accordance with the principles of this system, Ottomans signed treaties and armistice with foreign states for no more than ten years, so they were temporary agreements rather than permanent ones due to the ghaza policy derived from the Islamic dogma. However, this does not mean that the empire was in a permanent war with foreigners or non-Muslims, but it was used as a leverage to expand its territories and reach its objectives. On the other hand, these Âmans and treaties with foreign states were controlled and approved by Sheikh-ul Islam (the head of religious affairs). When the Ottoman Empire was powerful, the basic criteria for these Âmans and treaties was the interests of the state and its subjects. Âmans and treaties against the interests of the state were ruled out by the Sheikh-ul Islam. For example, despite an agreement between the Ottoman Empire and Venice on the basis of Âmans, with the fatwa of Sheikh-ul Islam Ebussuud Efendi, the empire launched an attack to Cyprus in 1570. This shows the pragmatism of Ottoman rulers which affected their foreign relations and diplomacy. (İskit, 147)
In addition, Âman system constituted the basis of treaties and agreements signed between the Ottomans and foreign states. In accordance with the principles of this system, Ottomans signed treaties and armistice with foreign states for no more than ten years, so they were temporary agreements rather than permanent ones due to the ghaza policy derived from the Islamic dogma. However, this does not mean that the empire was in a permanent war with foreigners or non-Muslims, but it was used as a leverage to expand its territories and reach its objectives. On the other hand, these Âmans and treaties with foreign states were controlled and approved by Sheikh-ul Islam (the head of religious affairs). When the Ottoman Empire was powerful, the basic criteria for these Âmans and treaties was the interests of the state and its subjects. Âmans and treaties against the interests of the state were ruled out by the Sheikh-ul Islam. For example, despite an agreement between the Ottoman Empire and Venice on the basis of Âmans, with the fatwa of Sheikh-ul Islam Ebussuud Efendi, the empire launched an attack to Cyprus in 1570. This shows the pragmatism of Ottoman rulers which affected their foreign relations and diplomacy. (İskit, 147)
Soru 26
Which of the following was the first state that opened an embassy in İstanbul?
Seçenekler
A
Venice
B
Poland
C
Russia
D
France
E
Austria
Açıklama:
Although they did not establish permanent embassies in foreign states before the 18th century, the Ottomans allowed foreign states to establish diplomatic missions in the empire. Venice was the first state opened an embassy in Istanbul right after the conquest. It was followed by Poland (1475), Russia (1497), France (1525), Austria (1528), the Great Britain (1583) and the Netherlands (1612). (İskit, 147- 148)
Soru 27
Why is establishing the first Ottoman Embassy in London in 1793 a turning point in Ottoman Diplomacy?
Seçenekler
A
The French Revolution had serious impact on the Ottoman Empire
B
They were aware of the loss of dominance and superiority over
C
The Industrial Revolution had serious impact on the Ottoman Empire
D
They wanted to integrate the empire to the European states system
E
Capitulations granted by the Ottomans turned into a burden
Açıklama:
Therefore, the first Ottoman Embassy was established in London in 1793 and this was a turning point in Ottoman diplomacy. Being aware of the loss of dominance and superiority over the European powers, which had become more powerful starting with colonization and continued with the French Revolution and the Industrial Revolution, Ottoman rulers used all instruments and institutions of diplomacy. The Industrial Revolution also played a serious role in the erosion of Ottoman power. With the accumulation of capital and boom in economic production, Western states hegemonized the international relations. On the contrary, the Ottoman Empire could not keep up pace with these developments and began to collapse due to the lack of initiative to adapt new rules and developments in technology, science, military and economy.
Soru 28
As a result of the balance of power strategy established in Europe with the Vienna Congress, which of the following was major diplomatic instrument in the 19th century?
Seçenekler
A
Permanent diplomacy
B
Temporary diplomacy
C
Multilateral diplomacy
D
Bilateral diplomacy
E
Unilateral diplomacy
Açıklama:
As a result of the balance of power strategy established in Europe with the Vienna Congress, multilateral diplomacy was the major diplomatic instrument in the 19th century. With the decline of Ottoman power in this period and the need to make alliances with the European powers in order to survive, Ottoman rulers did not hesitate to join multilateral conferences to solve their problems in the international arena.
Soru 29
With regard to foreign policy and diplomacy, which of the following is not a certain commonality between the Ottoman Empire and the Turkish Republic?
Seçenekler
A
The Straits and geographical location can be considered as important elements of its foreign policy
B
It conducted a cautious foreign policy and diplomacy because of the Balkans and the Middle East
C
The mindset of rulers and diplomats have been shaped by the Ottoman balance of power strategy
D
Both its founders Atatürk and İnönü and their successors tried hard to decrease the number of friends
E
They have attached great importance to the solution of problems through diplomacy
Açıklama:
However, with regard to foreign policy and diplomacy, there are certain commonalities between the Ottoman Empire and the Turkish Republic.
First of all, the Turkish Republic was established on the same geography despite shrinkage of Ottoman territories after the 18th century. The Straits and geographical location, as a bridge between Europe and Asia, of the Turkish Republic can be considered as important elements of its foreign policy. On the one hand, these elements enable Turkey, as a medium-sized power as opposed to the Ottoman Empire claiming global superiority, to carry out negotiations in order to maximize its interests to the extent possible, but, on the other hand, as a state encircled by regions like the Balkans and the Middle East full of problems forces it to conduct a cautious foreign policy and diplomacy.
Secondly, the mindset of the Republican rulers and diplomats have been shaped by the Ottoman balance of power strategy especially after the 19th century. Both its founders Atatürk and İnönü and their successors tried hard to increase the number of friends and decrease the number of enemies. Especially during WWII and the Cold War, Turkey tried to establish alliances with Western powers like the Great Britain and France against German and Italian revisionism and expansionism during WWII and the United States against the Soviet claims and threat during the Cold War. The global conjuncture and Turkey’s own interests like protection of territorial integrity and sovereignty, economic development and military modernization necessitated to do so. This also shows the Western-oriented foreign policy and diplomacy since the beginning of modernization and Westernization efforts in the Ottoman Empire by Selim III.
Thirdly, rulers of the Turkish Republic similar to the Ottoman sultans and the statesmen especially during the decline and collapse periods have refrained from wars and they have attached great importance to the solution of problems through diplomacy. In this vein, Turkey became a member of League of Nations (LoN) in 1932 upon its invitation and joined the United Nations (UN) after WWII and NATO in 1952. Protection of regional and global status quo as well as Turkey’s sovereignty and territorial integrity have been the priorities of Turkish statesmen. In addition, when Turkish foreign policy in the Republican era is considered, the dominance of leaders in the formulation of foreign policy can be clearly seen. Starting from Atatürk, dominant figures like İsmet İnönü, Adnan Menderes, Süleyman Demirel, Bülent Ecevit, Turgut Özal and Recep Tayyip Erdoğan have become influential figures in Turkish foreign policy.
First of all, the Turkish Republic was established on the same geography despite shrinkage of Ottoman territories after the 18th century. The Straits and geographical location, as a bridge between Europe and Asia, of the Turkish Republic can be considered as important elements of its foreign policy. On the one hand, these elements enable Turkey, as a medium-sized power as opposed to the Ottoman Empire claiming global superiority, to carry out negotiations in order to maximize its interests to the extent possible, but, on the other hand, as a state encircled by regions like the Balkans and the Middle East full of problems forces it to conduct a cautious foreign policy and diplomacy.
Secondly, the mindset of the Republican rulers and diplomats have been shaped by the Ottoman balance of power strategy especially after the 19th century. Both its founders Atatürk and İnönü and their successors tried hard to increase the number of friends and decrease the number of enemies. Especially during WWII and the Cold War, Turkey tried to establish alliances with Western powers like the Great Britain and France against German and Italian revisionism and expansionism during WWII and the United States against the Soviet claims and threat during the Cold War. The global conjuncture and Turkey’s own interests like protection of territorial integrity and sovereignty, economic development and military modernization necessitated to do so. This also shows the Western-oriented foreign policy and diplomacy since the beginning of modernization and Westernization efforts in the Ottoman Empire by Selim III.
Thirdly, rulers of the Turkish Republic similar to the Ottoman sultans and the statesmen especially during the decline and collapse periods have refrained from wars and they have attached great importance to the solution of problems through diplomacy. In this vein, Turkey became a member of League of Nations (LoN) in 1932 upon its invitation and joined the United Nations (UN) after WWII and NATO in 1952. Protection of regional and global status quo as well as Turkey’s sovereignty and territorial integrity have been the priorities of Turkish statesmen. In addition, when Turkish foreign policy in the Republican era is considered, the dominance of leaders in the formulation of foreign policy can be clearly seen. Starting from Atatürk, dominant figures like İsmet İnönü, Adnan Menderes, Süleyman Demirel, Bülent Ecevit, Turgut Özal and Recep Tayyip Erdoğan have become influential figures in Turkish foreign policy.
Soru 30
When the dynamics and institutions of Turkish foreign policy and diplomacy are considered, which of the following is not a criterion on the idea that Turkish diplomacy can be regarded as a continuation of Ottoman diplomacy?
Seçenekler
A
In terms of mindset
B
In terms of objectives
C
In terms of instruments
D
In terms of institution
E
In terms of alliences
Açıklama:
All-in-all, when the dynamics and institutions of Turkish foreign policy and diplomacy are considered, the heritage of Ottoman diplomacy can be clearly seen. In terms of mindset, objectives, instruments and institutions, Turkish diplomacy can be regarded as a continuation of Ottoman diplomacy.
Soru 31
What kind of diplomacy did the Ottoman Empire use until the end of 18th century?
Seçenekler
A
Ad hoc diplomacy
B
Superior-inferior dichotomy
C
Permanent diplomacy
D
Diplomatic letters
E
Dragoman
Açıklama:
It was the diplomatic system adapted by the states before the establishment of modern, permanent diplomacy in the 14th and 15th centuries. States were sending temporary representatives or missionaries to each other for specific missions. For the solution of problems, signing treaties, declaring their war or peace decisions, etc. rulers were sending their representatives. After the formation of modern diplomacy, states began to adapt professional and permanent institutions and instruments. The Ottoman Empire used ad hoc diplomacy until the end of 18th century. The reign of Selim III, who was closely following the developments in Europe, was a turning point in the adaptation of modern diplomacy. Especially with Mahmud II, the Ottoman Empire began to adapt the rules and institutions of modern diplomacy despite some shortcomings.
Soru 32
What were the economic, political, and legal privileges granted to foreign states and subjects which in time turned into burdens on the Ottoman Empire hard to carry?
Seçenekler
A
Ad hoc diplomacy
B
Permanent diplomacy
C
Capitulations
D
Superior-inferior dichotomy
E
Expansionism
Açıklama:
In the heydays of the Ottoman rule, Suleyman I (Kanuni) granted capitulations to France. Initially, capitulations were economic, political and legal privileges granted to foreign states and subjects. However, as time passed and the empire began to decline, they turned into burdens on the Ottoman Empire hard to carry.
Soru 33
- The Quran orders not establishing relations with infidels and fighting against them.
- Ottoman sultans was to expand their imperial power rather than solely expanding territories under the flag of Islam.
- Ottoman sultans thought that it was a kind of inferiority to establish permanent diplomatic missions in foreign countries.
Why did Ottoman Empire not have bilateral relations with the European or Christian states?
Seçenekler
A
I and II
B
I and III
C
II and III
D
I, II and III
E
Only II
Açıklama:
Ottoman sultans did not care for the support of other states or learning opinions and policies of them in certain issues because they thought that it was a kind of inferiority for them to establish permanent diplomatic missions in these countries. (Tuncer, 11) On the other hand, there are different approaches to the source of this sense of superiority. For some scholars, it derived from the perception of Islam as a universal religion and the Ottomans’ duty of safeguarding and expanding the rule of Islam. However, it can be argued that the basic motive of Ottoman sultans was to expand their imperial power rather than solely expanding territories under the flag of Islam. Therefore, the Ottoman rulers did not try to establish bilateral diplomatic relations and missions in foreign countries until the 18th century due to their imperial claims and the sense of superiority rather than religious biases which impeded their mutual relations on the basis of equality which is an important principle of modern diplomacy.
Soru 34
- Renaissance and Reformation movements
- Weak and incompetent rulers in Ottoman Dynasty
- End of Ottoman territorial expansion
- Loss of discipline and prestige of the Ottoman army
Which are the causes of Ottoman Empires' weakening in European diplomacy?
Seçenekler
A
II, III and IV
B
I, III and IV
C
I, II and IV
D
I, II and III
E
I, II, III and IV
Açıklama:
Nevertheless, the change of dynamics in the European states system with the end of Dark Ages after the 15th century with Renaissance and Reformation movements, on the one hand, and geographical discoveries, on the other, the Ottoman Empire faced new challenges and started to decline. However, the decadence of the Ottoman power cannot be explained only by external factors. In other words, after the 16th century, the empire was not ruled by strong and competent rulers as Mehmed II, Selim I and Suleyman I. The administrative system and the palace were full of problems. In addition, especially after mid-1600s, the Ottoman economy started to weaken with the end of territorial expansions, discovery of new routes and defeats in wars with stronger European states as a result of the formation of modern states and armies. Lastly, but more importantly, the Ottoman military system which was the major source of Ottoman power began to decline after the 16th century. Janissaries as the crux of the Ottoman military power lost their discipline and prestige as well as their adaptation to modern war techniques and tactics.
Soru 35
What was the privilege or immunity granted by the sultan to foreigners or non-Muslims and the system which protected the rights of non-Muslims within the boundaries of the empire was unilaterally granted by the Ottomans?
Seçenekler
A
Beylik
B
Aman
C
Ahidnames
D
Qanunnames
E
Capitulations
Açıklama:
In the heydays of the Ottoman Empire, its relations with foreign states were not based on mutuality, but on unilaterality. This system was known as the Âman (Mercy) System. Âman was the privilege or immunity granted by the sultan to foreigners or non-Muslims. This system which protected the rights of non-Muslims within the boundaries of the empire was unilaterally granted by the Ottomans. (Turan, 26)
Soru 36
Which states was the first to establish a permanent embassy in İstanbul?
Seçenekler
A
Poland
B
Russia
C
France
D
Austria
E
Venice
Açıklama:
Venice was the first state opened an embassy in Istanbul right after the conquest.
Soru 37
- signing peace treaties or trade agreements
- carrying out peace negotiations
- delivering letters from the sultan
- claiming taxes
Which of these missions could be assigned by the sultan to envoys or agents?
Seçenekler
A
I and II
B
II and III
C
III and IV
D
I, II, III
E
I, II, III and IV
Açıklama:
In the ad hoc diplomacy period, agents or envoys were sent to foreign states for different purposes. They were assigned by the sultan for signing peace treaties or trade agreements, peace proposals, carrying out peace negotiations or mediating between two states, negotiating the clauses of treaties, establishing or consolidating friendly relations, collecting debts of Ottomans, learning the opinions and policies of the states about the empire, declaring the change of throne, giving presents of the sultan, delivering letters from the sultan, declaring an Ottoman victory, congratulating a new monarch on behalf of the sultan, joining coronations of European monarchs, inviting European monarchs to certain ceremonies and claiming taxes.
Soru 38
What were reports that Ottoman envoys evaluated their missions assigned by the sultan?
Seçenekler
A
Sefaretname
B
Kanunname
C
Defterdar
D
Aman
E
Ahidname
Açıklama:
Ottoman envoys assigned by the sultan to carry out specific diplomatic activities were evaluating their missions in the reports called Sefaretname (Diplomatic Letters). Diplomatic letters were rich sources for the Ottoman diplomacy and diplomatic missions.
Soru 39
- French Revolution
- Emergence of nationalism and equality
- Russia's claims over Slavs in the Balkans
- Serbian revolt
- Greek revolt
Which of these contributed to the declaration of Tanzimat and Islahat Edicts which granted some right to foreign subjects of the Ottoman Empire?
Seçenekler
A
I, II and III
B
III, IV and V
C
I, III and V
D
II, III and V
E
I, II, III, IV and V
Açıklama:
The French Revolution (1789) and the Industrial Revolution (started in the late 18th century) had serious impact on the Ottoman Empire. Ideas of nationalism, nation-state, equality, fraternity, liberty and justice born out of the French Revolution accelerated the collapse of the empire as other multi-ethnic and multi-religious empires. Starting from the Balkans, all minorities in the Ottoman Empire came up with the demands for independence or at least equality among communities. Ottoman millet (community) system prevented them from being treated as equals. In this process, Ottoman subjects in the Balkans, started with Serbs in 1804 and Greeks in 1821, revolted against the Ottoman Empire. In order to save the empire from disintegrating and prevent foreign countries, like Russia claiming protectorate over the Slavs in the Balkans, from intervening in domestic policies, the Ottoman rulers had to take some serious measures. In 1839 Tanzimat Edict and in 1856 Islahat (Reform) Edict were declared to grant some rights and privileges to the foreign subjects of the Empire
Soru 40
Where was the first Ottoman Embassy established?
Seçenekler
A
Vienna
B
Paris
C
London
D
Rome
E
Berlin
Açıklama:
The first Ottoman Embassy was established in London in 1793 and this was a turning point in Ottoman diplomacy
Soru 41
When did the Ottoman Empire begin to adopt modern diplomacy?
Seçenekler
A
In the 14th century
B
In the early 15th century
C
At the beginning of the 17th century
D
At the end of the 18th century
E
In the 19th century
Açıklama:
The Ottoman Empire conducted its foreign relations via ad hoc diplomacy until the end of 18th century.
The correct choice is D.
The correct choice is D.
Soru 42
Which of the following is the period when the Ottomans implemented Ad Hoc diplomacy?
Seçenekler
A
1299-1453
B
1299-1793
C
1453-1793
D
1793-1908
E
1793-1922
Açıklama:
1299-1793 is the period when the Ottomans implemented Ad Hoc diplomacy.
The correct choice is B.
The correct choice is B.
Soru 43
Which of the following is the privilege or immunity unilaterally granted by the Ottoman Sultan to and protecting the rights of foreigners and non-Muslims within the boundaries of the Empire?
Seçenekler
A
Ad hoc diplomacy
B
Âman
C
Ghaza
D
Qanunname
E
Ahidname
Açıklama:
Âman was the privilege or immunity granted by the sultan to foreigners or non-Muslims. This system which protected the rights of non-Muslims within the boundaries of the empire was unilaterally granted by the Ottomans.
The correct choice is B.
The correct choice is B.
Soru 44
Which Ottoman Sultan granted the first capitulations to a foreign state?
Seçenekler
A
Süleyman I
B
Mehmed II
C
Selim III
D
Mahmud II
E
Abdulhamid II
Açıklama:
As early as the fifteenth century, Mehmed II granted capitulations to Venice.
The correct choice is B.
The correct choice is B.
Soru 45
Which state did the Ottoman Empire grant the first capitulations?
Seçenekler
A
France
B
Italy
C
Venice
D
Germany
E
The Great Britain
Açıklama:
As early as the fifteenth century, Mehmed II granted capitulations to Venice.
The correct choice is C.
The correct choice is C.
Soru 46
Which of the following states was the first to open an embassy in Istanbul?
Seçenekler
A
Russia
B
Poland
C
Austria
D
Italy
E
Venice
Açıklama:
Venice was the first state opened an embassy in Istanbul right after the conquest. It was followed by Poland (1475), Russia (1497), France (1525), Austria (1528), the Great Britain (1583) and the Netherlands (1612).
The correct choice is E.
The correct choice is E.
Soru 47
What was the reason why the Ottomans did not establish permanent embassies in foreign states in the ad hoc diplomacy period?
Seçenekler
A
Geographical distance
B
Economic conditions
C
Sense of superiority
D
Ongoing wars
E
Protective policies
Açıklama:
Ottoman rulers did not need to open embassies in return for the embassies established by European states in the Ottoman capital due to the sense of superiority and self-sufficiency.
The correct choice is C.
The correct choice is C.
Soru 48
Where was the first Ottoman embassy established?
Seçenekler
A
In Paris
B
In Venice
C
In Moscow
D
In London
E
In Vienna
Açıklama:
The first Ottoman Embassy was established in London.
The correct choice is D.
The correct choice is D.
Soru 49
When was the first Ottoman embassy in London established?
Seçenekler
A
1793
B
1808
C
1853
D
1856
E
1908
Açıklama:
The first Ottoman Embassy was established in London in 1793.
The correct choice is A.
The correct choice is A.
Soru 50
Who established the Transition Room in the Ottoman Empire?
Seçenekler
A
Selim III
B
Abdulhamid II
C
Süleyman I
D
Mahmud II
E
Mehmed II
Açıklama:
During the reign of Mahmud II, training Turkish-Muslim translators and diplomats became a priority for the Ottomans. To this end, Tercüme Odası (Translation Room) was established in 1821 and Muslim-Turkish translators began to be trained in this institution
The correct choice is D.
The correct choice is D.
Ünite 5
Soru 1
When did professionalization of diplomatic institutions start with the Westphalia Treaty?
Seçenekler
A
1648
B
1945
C
1980
D
1765
E
1665
Açıklama:
Professionalization of diplomatic institutions started with the Westphalia Treaty in 1648 after which modern and secular states began to be established.
Soru 2
I. multilateral diplomacy
II. ministry of foreign affairs
III. summit diplomacy
IV. non-state actors
Which of the above are diplomatic institutions?
II. ministry of foreign affairs
III. summit diplomacy
IV. non-state actors
Which of the above are diplomatic institutions?
Seçenekler
A
I, II
B
I, IV
C
I, III
D
II, III
E
III, IV
Açıklama:
Diplomatic instruments can be classified as bilateral diplomacy, multilateral diplomacy and summit diplomacy.
Soru 3
When do the origins of modern diplomacy date back to?
Seçenekler
A
5th century
B
14th century
C
1961
D
1945
E
1648
Açıklama:
Origins of modern diplomacy date back to Italian city states in the 14th century. The basic reason for the need to establish diplomatic relations between Italian city states was the limited amount of lands to rule. Therefore, they had to solve their problems peacefully in such an environment prone to warfare.
Soru 4
What is the name of the system established in Europe with the Vienna Congress on the basis of balance of power strategy to protect status quo after Napoleonic Wars between 1800 and 1815.
Seçenekler
A
NGO
B
United Nations
C
Westphalia Treaty
D
League of Nations
E
Concert of Europe
Açıklama:
It is a system established in Europe with the Vienna Congress on the basis of balance of power strategy to protect status quo after Napoleonic Wars between 1800 and 1815.
Soru 5
Which country was not one of the main actors of League of Nations?
Seçenekler
A
The Great Britain
B
France
C
Italy
D
Germany
E
The United States
Açıklama:
The Great Britain, France, Italy and the United States were the main actors in this system.
Soru 6
What is the name of diplomatic practice consisting of two states meeting to solve their problems?
Seçenekler
A
Bilateral Diplomacy
B
Non-Governmental Diplomacy
C
Mono Diplomacy
D
Summit Diplomacy
E
Multilateral Diplomacy
Açıklama:
Bilateral diplomacy is the oldest form of diplomatic practice consisting of two states meeting to solve their problems.
Soru 7
Where the origins of bilateral diplomacy date back to?
Seçenekler
A
Greece
B
Italy
C
China
D
US
E
UK
Açıklama:
Its origins date back to ancient Greece.
Soru 8
Which country is not one of the main actors of UN?
Seçenekler
A
United States
B
Russia
C
France
D
China
E
Italy
Açıklama:
Main actors in the UN are the United States, Russia (formerly the Soviet Union), the Great Britain, France and China.
Soru 9
Besides its main bodies, UN has subsidiary organs. Which of the below items is not one of them?
Seçenekler
A
UNICEF
B
FAO
C
NGO
D
WHO
E
UNESCO
Açıklama:
Besides its main bodies, UN has subsidiary organs such as United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), World Health Organization (WHO), Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO, United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund (UNICEF) and United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR).
Soru 10
What are the non-governmental and non-profit organizations interested in global problems such as global warming, pollution, human rights, children’s rights, health problems, refugees and so on?
Seçenekler
A
EFTAs
B
NGOs
C
NAFTAs
D
OECDs
E
CENTOs
Açıklama:
NGOs are non-governmental and non-profit organizations interested in global problems such as global warming, pollution, human rights, children’s rights, health problems, refugees and so on.
Soru 11
Evolution of diplomatic instruments and institutions was triggered after _______ with the formation of nation states in today’s understanding.
Seçenekler
A
the French Revolution
B
the Westphalia Treaty
C
the Congress of Vienna
D
the Peace of Lodi
E
Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations
Açıklama:
Evolution of diplomatic instruments and institutions triggered after the French Revolution with the formation of nation states in today’s understanding. As time passed, forms of these tools have changed. The last turning point in this process can be regarded as the globalization era after 1980s.
Soru 12
However, professionalization of diplomatic institutions started with ________ in 1648 after which modern and secular states began to be established.
Seçenekler
A
the Congress of Vienna
B
the Westphalia Treaty
C
the Peace of Lodi
D
Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations
E
the French Revolution
Açıklama:
However, professionalization of diplomatic institutions started with the Westphalia Treaty in 1648 after which modern and secular states began to be established.
Soru 13
Which of the following is not a main actor of League of Nations?
Seçenekler
A
France
B
Great Britain
C
Japan
D
Italy
E
United States
Açıklama:
League of Nations
This institution was the predecessor of the United Nations which was established by the victorious states of WWI on January 10, 1920. The Great Britain, France, Italy and the United States were the main actors in this system. It was established to protect world peace and solve problems among states. However, due to its internal problems like strategies and policies of its main actors towards the losers of WWI, it became futile less than two decades. With its inability to prevent Italian invasion of Abyssinia, Japanese invasion of Manchuria and Nazi invasion of Austria and Czechoslovakia, the prestige of the institution dramatically decreased and these developments resulted in the eruption of WWII.
This institution was the predecessor of the United Nations which was established by the victorious states of WWI on January 10, 1920. The Great Britain, France, Italy and the United States were the main actors in this system. It was established to protect world peace and solve problems among states. However, due to its internal problems like strategies and policies of its main actors towards the losers of WWI, it became futile less than two decades. With its inability to prevent Italian invasion of Abyssinia, Japanese invasion of Manchuria and Nazi invasion of Austria and Czechoslovakia, the prestige of the institution dramatically decreased and these developments resulted in the eruption of WWII.
Soru 14
Which of the following is a characteristics of bilateral diplomacy?
Seçenekler
A
These two states do not have to recognize each other
B
Recognition grants that just internationally it has to be independent from any other state
C
Membership to the UN is not a criterion for recognition
D
Bilateral diplomacy is conducted between two states
E
UN membership is an indicator of regional recognition
Açıklama:
Bilateral diplomacy is conducted between two states, but, initially, these two states have to recognize each other to establish diplomatic missions and carry out diplomatic practice. Recognition means the acceptance of the existence of a state as an independent and sovereign entity in the international arena. Recognition consists two rights of a state: domestically it has to enjoy full sovereignty over its territories, internationally it has to be independent from any other state. Moreover, membership to the 0 (UN) is another criterion for recognition. UN membership is an indicator of global recognition and today almost all states with full sovereignty and independence are members of UN.
Soru 15
Which of the following is not a characteristics of multilateral diplomacy?
Seçenekler
A
It is a diplomatic relation between more than two states
B
It is also known as “conference diplomacy”
C
It develops closer relations between states
D
Powerful states use multilateral conferences for propaganda
E
states not joining multilateral conferences don’t lose the right to have a say
Açıklama:
Multilateral diplomacy is literally defined as diplomatic relations between more than two states. It is also known as “conference diplomacy” or “parliamentary diplomacy” because multilateral diplomatic relations are mainly conducted through conferences and face-to-face interaction between leaders or missions of states. Its origins go back to Vienna Congress convened in 1815 after Napoleonic Wars when European powers came up with the idea of balance of power strategy which sustained peace in Europe until WWI. Multilateral diplomacy became popular in the 20th century because problems between states turned into global problems such as peace and security, environment, health, migration, etc. and international actors understood that such problems had to be negotiated and solved through multilateral diplomacy. The rise of democracy and its ideals after WWII resulted in the democratization of diplomacy and diplomatic practices. More importantly, the accountability of states to their domestic public opinion as well as world public opinion necessitated the establishment of the instruments and institutions of multilateral diplomacy. As a result, multilateral conferences or organizations aim to provide the support of all parties in the solution of global problems which require support and initiative of all sides. There are many advantages of multilateral conferences like focusing on specific issues and motivating the parties to find a solution or reach an agreement in a limited period of time. As a result of collaboration among participants, it develops closer relations between states. Finding a solution or reaching an agreement is beneficial for all parties because it increases their prestige and popularity. Due to the limited period of time, multilateral conferences force parties to focus on specific issues and come up with solutions. (İskit, 307-308) On the other hand, multilateral conferences are used by powerful states to make their propaganda as dominant states in the international arena as well as drawing the attention of all states to global problems such as environmental and economic issues. Joining such conferences and organizations increase the prestige of participants. On the contrary, states not joining these multilateral entities may lose their prestige and the right to have a say in ultimate decisions.
Soru 16
Which of the following is not one of six main bodies of UN?
Seçenekler
A
World Health Organization
B
Secretary General
C
Security Council
D
Economic and Social Council
E
Trusteeship Council
Açıklama:
UN consists of six main bodies: General Assembly, Security Council, Economic and Social Council, Trusteeship Council, International Court of Justice and Secretariat. Except International Court of Justice in Hague, other bodies of UN are in New York. Major functional bodies of the UN are General Assembly and Security Council. General Assembly comprises of all UN members and each state has one vote for the decisions. General Assembly focuses on issues such as “considering and approving the United Nations budget and establishing the financial assessments of Member States; electing the non-permanent members of the Security Council and the members of other United Nations councils and organs, on the recommendation of the Security Council appointing the Secretary-General.
Soru 17
Which of the following was a turning point in the rise of summit diplomacy?
Seçenekler
A
European Union
B
WWI
C
League of Nations
D
WWII
E
United Nations
Açıklama:
WWI was a turning point in the rise of summit diplomacy as a result the decrease in trust to professional diplomats due to their inability to prevent such a global war and summit diplomacy became widespread.
Soru 18
Which of the following is not true about NGOs?
Seçenekler
A
These are voluntary citizens’ organizations
B
They act on national, regional or international levels
C
These are profit based organizations
D
They monitor the implementation of decisions
E
They monitor treaties on various issues
Açıklama:
Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs). These are non-profit, voluntary citizens’ organizations acting on national, regional or international levels out of the jurisdiction of states. They provide monitoring for the implementation of decisions and treaties on various issues ranging from environment to human rights.
Soru 19
Where was the first ministry of foreign affairs in today’s understanding was established in the 1620s?
Seçenekler
A
In Great Britain
B
In Austria
C
In Poland
D
In France
E
In Hungary
Açıklama:
The first ministry of foreign affairs in today’s understanding was established in France in the 1620s by Cardinal Richelieu after three centuries from the establishment of modern diplomatic missions.
Soru 20
Which of the following Articles of Vienna Convention regulate immunities of diplomatic missions?
Seçenekler
A
Articles 22nd to 28th
B
Articles 23rd to 28th
C
Articles 24th to 28th
D
Articles 25th to 28th
E
Articles 26th to 28th
Açıklama:
Diplomatic missions and diplomats act under the protection of immunities granted by the Vienna Convention. There are two types of immunities: immunities of missions and immunities of diplomats. Articles 22nd to 28th regulate immunities of diplomatic missions.
Soru 21
Which of the following started professionalization of diplomatic institutions?
Seçenekler
A
Westphalia Treaty
B
French Revolution
C
Concert of Europe
D
Vienna Congress
E
League of Nations
Açıklama:
However, professionalization of diplomatic institutions started with the Westphalia Treaty in 1648 after which modern and secular states began to be established. This treaty is regarded as the beginning of modern and secular state formation in diplomatic history. Westphalia Treaty can be considered as the first international conference of the European states which ended Thirty Years War between Habsburgs and Bourbons in 1648. With this treaty, division of Holy Roman Empire into more than three hundred principalities was recognized and the position of France in the European continent strengthened. After Westphalia Treaty, formation of independent states in Europe accelerated.
Soru 22
Which of the following is a contribution of the Reformation in the formation modern diplomacy?
Seçenekler
A
It slowed down the formation of modern states
B
It accelerated the secularization of regimes
C
It accelerated the formation of non-govermental organizations in Europe
D
It accelerated the temporary missions
E
It triggered the evaluation of diplomatic institutions
Açıklama:
Besides Renaissance in the 14th century, Reformation which spread Europe from Germany after the 15th century played an important role in the formation of modern diplomacy because it accelerated the secularization of regimes and the formation of modern states in today’s understanding.
Soru 23
Which of the following is a characteristics of Concert of Europe?
Seçenekler
A
It was the predecessor of the United Nations
B
It was established to protect world peace
C
It was based on balance of power
D
It worked until the Second World War
E
It worked until the Cold War
Açıklama:
After the Napoleonic wars, which shook Europe thoroughly, European states established the Concert of Europe system based on balance of power in 1815 which protected status quo, despite some regional wars, in Europe until WWI.
Concert of Europe
It is a system established in Europe with the Vienna Congress on the basis of balance of power strategy to protect status quo after Napoleonic Wars between 1800 and 1815. In the early 1800s, France under the leadership of Napoleon Bonaparte, who had declared his empire with the fall of Republican regime in France, was fighting with certain European states in order to expand its territories especially eastwards. With the defeat of Napoleon in Russia and Great Britain, European states decided to establish such a system in order to prevent the birth and rule of Napoleon-like figures and states. Concert of Europe system worked until the First World War (WWI) despite some regional conflicts and wars. However, with the polarization in the early 1900s, this system was replaced by alliances and divisions that paved the way for WWI.
Concert of Europe
It is a system established in Europe with the Vienna Congress on the basis of balance of power strategy to protect status quo after Napoleonic Wars between 1800 and 1815. In the early 1800s, France under the leadership of Napoleon Bonaparte, who had declared his empire with the fall of Republican regime in France, was fighting with certain European states in order to expand its territories especially eastwards. With the defeat of Napoleon in Russia and Great Britain, European states decided to establish such a system in order to prevent the birth and rule of Napoleon-like figures and states. Concert of Europe system worked until the First World War (WWI) despite some regional conflicts and wars. However, with the polarization in the early 1900s, this system was replaced by alliances and divisions that paved the way for WWI.
Soru 24
Which of the following is not a contribution of the Cold War in the evaluation of modern diplomacy?
Seçenekler
A
Diplomacy became an integral part of Cold War politics in the form summit diplomacy
B
Diplomatic institutions and instruments have been professionalized as of Cold War
C
Bilateral negotiations and summits have jointly become the platform of inter-state relations
D
NGOs and MNCs have become avoidable parts of diplomacy in the global age
E
Multilateral negotiations and summits have jointly become the platform of inter-state relations
Açıklama:
The Cold War was another turning point in the evolution of modern diplomacy. Despite the existence of nuclear threat stemmed from proliferation of nuclear weapons and the feeling of insecurity throughout the world, diplomacy became an integral part of Cold War politics especially in the form of summit diplomacy between two superpowers. Therefore, diplomatic institutions and instruments have been professionalized since the beginning of the Cold War with the unprecedented development of globalization. Bilateral and multilateral negotiations and summits have jointly become the platform of inter-state relations. Institutionally, ministries of Foreign Affairs and diplomatic missions are still basic institutions of diplomacy. Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) and Multi-National Companies (MNCs) have become essential parts of diplomacy in the global age.
Soru 25
Which of the following is a characteristics of bilateral diplomacy?
Seçenekler
A
It is conducted between two states
B
These two states have to recognize each other
C
Membership to the UN is another criterion for recognition
D
Recognition is a part of “mutual consent
E
Recognition and diplomacy always go hand-in-hand
Açıklama:
Bilateral diplomacy is conducted between two states, but, initially, these two states have to recognize each other to establish diplomatic missions and carry out diplomatic practice. Recognition means the acceptance of the existence of a state as an independent and sovereign entity in the international arena. Recognition consists two rights of a state: domestically it has to enjoy full sovereignty over its territories, internationally it has to be independent from any other state. Moreover, membership to the 0 (UN) is another criterion for recognition. UN membership is an indicator of global recognition and today almost all states with full sovereignty and independence are members of UN. On the other hand, according to the second article of the Vienna Convention, which was accepted in 1961 and determines the rules, instruments and institutions of diplomacy, diplomatic relations between states have to be based on “mutual consent.” Recognition is a part of “mutual consent”, but recognition and diplomacy do not always go hand-in-hand. More clearly, states may recognize each other, but not carry out diplomatic relations.
Soru 26
What is the other name of multilateral diplomacy?
Seçenekler
A
Conference diplomacy
B
Bilateral diplomacy
C
Ad hoc diplomacy
D
Permanent diplomacy
E
Temporary diplomacy
Açıklama:
Multilateral diplomacy is literally defined as diplomatic relations between more than two states. It is also known as “conference diplomacy” or “parliamentary diplomacy” because multilateral diplomatic relations are mainly conducted through conferences and face-to-face interaction between leaders or missions of states.
Soru 27
Which of the following is not an advantages of multilateral diplomacy?
Seçenekler
A
It focuses on specific issues to reach an agreement
B
It forces parties to come up with solutions
C
It motivates the parties to find a solution
D
It develops closer relations between states
E
It is used by powerful states to make their propaganda
Açıklama:
There are many advantages of multilateral conferences like focusing on specific issues and motivating the parties to find a solution or reach an agreement in a limited period of time. As a result of collaboration among participants, it develops closer relations between states. Finding a solution or reaching an agreement is beneficial for all parties because it increases their prestige and popularity. Due to the limited period of time, multilateral conferences force parties to focus on specific issues and come up with solutions. (İskit, 307-308) On the other hand, multilateral conferences are used by powerful states to make their propaganda as dominant states in the international arena as well as drawing the attention of all states to global problems such as environmental and economic issues. Joining such conferences and organizations increase the prestige of participants. On the contrary, states not joining these multilateral entities may lose their prestige and the right to have a say in ultimate decisions. Non-participating states may suffer from the decisions made against them in these conferences. Therefore, all the states having an interest in such meetings push hard for participation. Furthermore, multilateral diplomacy provides a medium for the development of bilateral relations because through bilateral meetings or social events during multilateral conferences such as NATO and EU meetings, heads or missions of states may develop their contacts and relations. Lastly, multilateral conferences may ensure compliance with agreements or decisions made by the states better than bilateral ones due to the pressure of other states and world public opinion.
Soru 28
Which of the following is a characteristic of regular summits?
Seçenekler
A
They provide basis for negotiations
B
They allow leaders to prepare before sessions
C
Their success is based on frequency and duration
D
The summits are regularly convened
E
Leaders learn the details of issues discussed
Açıklama:
Regular summits provide basis for negotiations, but their success is based on the frequency and duration. Frequently organized and long meetings enable the participants to reach some conclusions and solve problems. Moreover, due to the length of such meetings, there is room for re-negotiation unless parties don’t reach a conclusion in the first trial. In time, as these summits are regularly convened, their principles are specified and their efficiency increases. More importantly, regular meetings allow leaders to prepare before sessions and learn details of issues discussed in these meetings as well as characteristics and tendencies of their counterparts. Summits are effective tools to conclude negotiations discussed in international forums successfully. In order to reach conclusions satisfactory for both sides, leaders push hard for succeed in these summits, so the “diplomatic momentum” between two summits continues. Regular meetings of European Union (EU) leaders are important examples of these meetings.
Soru 29
Which of the following is not a characteristics of the Ad hoc summits?
Seçenekler
A
They are convened to solve specific problems
B
They are convened to create diplomatic momentum
C
They are convened to discuss specific issues
D
Only the leaders meet and discuss in funeral ceremonies of leaders
E
They aim to create a symbolic milestone for solution
Açıklama:
Ad hoc summits, on the other hand, are convened to solve specific problems or discuss specific issues as well as to create diplomatic momentum. Camp David meetings in 1978 led by Jimmy Carter to discuss peace settlement between Egypt and Israel with the participation of Egyptian leader Anwar Sadat and Israeli prime minister Menachem Begin can be regarded as an example of ad hoc summit. After twelve days of negotiations, both sides agreed on signing a peace agreement. Main objective of an ad hoc summit is to create a symbolic milestone for solution of a specific problem between states. Another example of ad hoc summits is funeral ceremonies of leaders. In these summits, leaders and their missions meet and discuss certain issues as well as develop their relations.
Soru 30
Which of the following is not a true statement about high-level meetings?
Seçenekler
A
It can be defined as meetings of leaders during their official visits
B
It can provide information about policies of their counterparts
C
It can help leaders develop friendly and economic relations with the host country
D
It is an important instrument of modern diplomacy
E
It cannot be used as a part of bilateral or multilateral diplomacy
Açıklama:
Lastly, high-level meetings can be defined as meetings of leaders within the context of their official visits. Especially, newly elected leaders visit foreign countries and meet their counterparts. Such visits provide information about policies and characteristics and opinions of their counterparts. In addition, leaders aim at developing friendly relations and economic relations with the host country. To sum up, like bilateral and multilateral diplomacy, summit diplomacy is an important instrument of modern diplomacy. However, it needs to be underlined that these instruments are not mutually-exclusive. In other words, summit diplomacy can be used as a part of bilateral or multilateral diplomacy. Like bilateral and multilateral diplomacy, summit diplomacy has some advantages and disadvantages. The efficiency of these diplomatic instruments depend on the power and capabilities of states as well as the institutions using these instruments. Diplomatic missions, ministries of foreign affairs and non-state actors such as non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and multi-national companies (MNCs) are basic institutions of modern diplomacy.
Soru 31
Which treaty is regarded as the beginning of modern and secular state formation in diplomatic history?
Seçenekler
A
Westphalia Treaty
B
League of Nations
C
Concert of Europe
D
United Nations
E
Summit Diplomacy
Açıklama:
Westphalia Treaty This treaty is regarded as the beginning of modern and secular state formation in diplomatic history. Westphalia Treaty can be considered as the first international conference of the European states which ended Thirty Years War between Habsburgs and Bourbons in 1648. With this treaty, division of Holy Roman Empire into more than three hundred principalities was recognized and the position of France in the European continent strengthened. After Westphalia Treaty, formation of independent states in Europe accelerated.
Soru 32
Which institution was the predecessor of the United Nations which was established by the victorious states of WWI on January 10, 1920?
Seçenekler
A
Concert of Europe
B
League of Nations
C
Westphalia Treaty
D
United Nations
E
NATO
Açıklama:
League of Nations was the predecessor of the United Nations which was established by the victorious states of WWI on January 10, 1920. The Great Britain, France, Italy and the United States were the main actors in this system. It was established to protect world peace and solve problems among states. However, due to its internal problems like strategies and policies of its main actors towards the losers of WWI, it became futile less than two decades. With its inability to prevent Italian invasion of Abyssinia, Japanese invasion of Manchuria and Nazi invasion of Austria and Czechoslovakia, the prestige of the institution dramatically decreased and these developments resulted in the eruption of WWII.
Soru 33
What is the a system established in Europe with the Vienna Congress on the basis of balance of power strategy to protect status quo after Napoleonic Wars between 1800 and 1815?
Seçenekler
A
League of Nations
B
United Nations
C
NATO
D
Concert of Europe
E
CENTO
Açıklama:
Concert of Europe is a system established in Europe with the Vienna Congress on the basis of balance of power strategy to protect status quo after Napoleonic Wars between 1800 and 1815. In the early 1800s, France under the leadership of Napoleon Bonaparte, who had declared his empire with the fall of Republican regime in France, was fighting with certain European states in order to expand its territories especially eastwards. With the defeat of Napoleon in Russia and Great Britain, European states decided to establish such a system in order to prevent the birth and rule of Napoleon-like figures and states. Concert of Europe system worked until the First World War (WWI) despite some regional conflicts and wars. However, with the polarization in the early 1900s, this system was replaced by alliances and divisions that paved the way for WWI.
Soru 34
- It is the oldest form of diplomatic practice consisting of two states meeting to solve their problems.
- Until the end of WWI, this kind of diplomacy kept its hegemony in the international relations.
- This type of diplomacy is conducted between two states, but, initially, these two states have to recognize each other to establish diplomatic missions and carry out diplomatic practice.
What kind of diplomacy is defined above?
Seçenekler
A
Summit
B
Bilateral
C
Multilateral
D
Ad hoc
E
Non-profit organization
Açıklama:
Bilateral diplomacy is the oldest form of diplomatic practice consisting of two states meeting to solve their problems. Bilateral diplomacy is conducted between two states, but, initially, these two states have to recognize each other to establish diplomatic missions and carry out diplomatic practice. Until the end of WWI, bilateral diplomacy kept its hegemony in the international relations.
Soru 35
- This kind of diplomacy is literally defined as diplomatic relations between more than two states.
- It is also known as “conference diplomacy” or “parliamentary diplomacy”.
What kind of diplomacy is defined above?
Seçenekler
A
Bilateral
B
Summit
C
Multilateral
D
Non-Profit Organization
E
Ad hoc
Açıklama:
Multilateral diplomacy is literally defined as diplomatic relations between more than two states. It is also known as “conference diplomacy” or “parliamentary diplomacy” because multilateral diplomatic relations are mainly conducted through conferences and face-to-face interaction between leaders or missions of states.
Soru 36
After World War I which organization was established to protect world peace and collective security as a part of multilateral diplomacy in 1920?
Seçenekler
A
League of Nations
B
NATO
C
NAFTA
D
EU
E
UN
Açıklama:
After WWI, the Allies which defeated Entente powers agreed on the establishment of a multilateral organization to protect world peace and collective security. In addition, they sought for creating a basis for solution of problems via discussion among states. As a result, League of Nations (LoN) was established in 1920 to provide such a basis for multilateralism.
Soru 37
- This institution was created by the victorious states of WWII which defeated Fascism and its expansionist policies.
- Main actors in this institution are the United States, Russia (formerly the Soviet Union), the Great Britain, France and China.
- The basic objective of this institution is to protect sovereignty of its member states and world peace.
Which international organization is defined above?
Seçenekler
A
UN
B
NATO
C
League of Nations
D
NAFTA
E
UNICEF
Açıklama:
United Nations This institution was created by the victorious states of WWII which defeated Fascism and its expansionist policies. Main actors in the UN are the United States, Russia (formerly the Soviet Union), the Great Britain, France and China. The basic objective of the UN is to protect sovereignty of its member states and world peace. However, when the crises and regional wars in the world since its establishment are taken into consideration, it can be securely argued that the UN has reached its aims far from ideally. This stems from its internal problems like the veto rights of the permanent members of the Security Council. (five states stated above) Especially during the Cold War, it became a leverage between superpowers to legitimize their actions and put pressure on each other. Today, the UN has about two hundred members and it has various branches like UNICEF (UN Children’s Fund), UNESCO (UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization), WFP (World Food Programme), etc. dealing with certain world problems
Soru 38
In which country was the first professional ministry of foreign affairs set up?
Seçenekler
A
Turkey
B
France
C
Spain
D
Canada
E
Germany
Açıklama:
First professional ministry was established in France in the early 17th century.
Soru 39
What was the commonly-used form of diplomacy before World War I?
Seçenekler
A
Modern diplomacy
B
Summit diplomacy
C
Multilateral diplomacy
D
Bilateral diplomacy
E
State diplomacy
Açıklama:
Until the end of WWI, bilateral diplomacy kept its hegemony in the international relations.
Soru 40
What historical event was the corner stone in the development of multilateral diplomacy?
Seçenekler
A
Berlin Congress
B
Vienna Congress
C
Paris Peace Conference
D
San Francisco Peace Conference
E
Westphalia Treaty
Açıklama:
Multilateral diplomacy is literally defined as diplomatic relations between more than two states. It is also known as “conference diplomacy” or “parliamentary diplomacy” because multilateral diplomatic relations are mainly conducted through conferences and face-to-face interaction between leaders or missions of states. Its origins go back to Vienna Congress convened in 1815 after Napoleonic Wars when European powers came up with the idea of balance of power strategy which sustained peace in Europe until WWI
Soru 41
Where was the first professional ministry established in the early 17th century?
Seçenekler
A
Italy
B
France
C
Britain
D
Germany
E
Spain
Açıklama:
Diplomatic institutions can be broadly divided into three categories: ministry of foreign affairs, diplomatic missions and non-state actors. First professional ministry was established in France in the early 17th century.
Soru 42
What was the basic reason for Italian city-states to establish diplomatic relations and create modern diplomacy?
Seçenekler
A
Their war-ridden nature
B
Outside forces that always forced them to fight
C
Limited amount of lands to rule.
D
Religious disagreements
E
Their wish to be free
Açıklama:
Origins of modern diplomacy date back to Italian city states in the 14th century. The basic reason for the need to establish diplomatic relations between Italian city states was the limited amount of lands to rule. Therefore, they had to solve their problems peacefully in such an environment prone to warfare. As armies became more professional and the impact of war on these states got more severe, they had to find alternative ways to solve their problems without going into war.
Soru 43
What was the event which ended religious wars in Europe became a turning point in the formation of modern states and the evolution of modern diplomacy?
Seçenekler
A
Renaissance in the 14th century.
B
Reformation which spread Europe from Germany after the 15th century.
C
Napoleonic wars
D
Westphalia Treaty in 1648.
E
World War I
Açıklama:
Besides Renaissance in the 14th century, Reformation which spread Europe from Germany after the 15th century played an important role in the formation of modern diplomacy because it accelerated the secularization of regimes and the formation of modern states in today’s understanding. Similarly, Westphalia Treaty in 1648 which ended religious wars in Europe became a turning point in the formation of modern states and the evolution of modern diplomacy. After the Napoleonic wars, which shook Europe thoroughly, European states established the Concert of Europe system based on balance of power in 1815 which protected status quo, despite some regional wars, in Europe until WWI.
Soru 44
Which diplomacy type is the oldest form of diplomatic practice consisting of two states meeting to solve their problems?
Seçenekler
A
Multilateral diplomacy
B
Summit diplomacy
C
Public diplomacy
D
Economic diplomacy
E
Bilateral diplomacy
Açıklama:
Bilateral diplomacy is the oldest form of diplomatic practice consisting of two states meeting to solve their problems. Its origins date back to ancient Greece, but after the 14th century, it was professionalized by the Italian city states.
Soru 45
Which option gives correct information about multilateral diplomacy?
Seçenekler
A
Its origins go back to Vienna Congress.
B
It's the oldest form of diplomatic practice.
C
It traces back to Middle Ages.
D
The French Revolution was a turning point in the evolution of it.
E
Until the end of WWI, it kept its hegemony in the international relations.
Açıklama:
Multilateral diplomacy is literally defined as diplomatic relations between more than two states. It is also known as “conference diplomacy” or “parliamentary diplomacy” because multilateral diplomatic relations are mainly conducted through conferences and face-to-face interaction between leaders or missions of states. Its origins go back to Vienna Congress convened in 1815 after Napoleonic Wars when European powers came up with the idea of balance of power strategy which sustained peace in Europe until WWI.
Soru 46
Which option is true about regular summits?
Seçenekler
A
They are convened to solve specific problems or discuss specific issues as well as to create diplomatic momentum.
B
Their main objective is to create a symbolic milestone for solution of a specific problem between states.
C
They can be defined as meetings of leaders within the context of their official visits.
D
They provide basis for negotiations and their success is based on the frequency and duration.
E
An example of these summits is funeral ceremonies of leaders.
Açıklama:
Regular summits provide basis for negotiations, but their success is based on the frequency and duration. Frequently organized and long meetings enable the participants to reach some conclusions and solve problems. Moreover, due to the length of such meetings, there is room for re- negotiation unless parties don’t reach a conclusion in the first trial.
Soru 47
What does NGO stand for in diplomatic terms?
Seçenekler
A
Next Generation Office
B
Non-Governmental Organizations
C
National Gas Outlet
D
New Galactic Order
E
National Grid Office
Açıklama:
Globalization resulted in the diversification of diplomatic institutions and changed functions and roles of ministries of foreign affairs and diplomatic missions. Non-state actors like non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and multinational companies (MNCs) were involved in diplomatic practices. Although the state and its institutions are at the center of diplomatic activities, the influence of non-state actors in international relations and diplomacy is indisputable.
Soru 48
Which institution is the main body in the state apparatus responsible for the formulation and implementation of foreign policy?
Seçenekler
A
The Directorate for Internal Control
B
Ministry of Commerce
C
Ministry of Internal Affairs
D
Ministry of Tourism
E
Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Açıklama:
Ministry of foreign affairs is the main body in the state apparatus responsible for the formulation and implementation of foreign policy. It consists of the ministerial structure and diplomatic missions.
Soru 49
What does the 2nd Article of the Vienna convention state?
Seçenekler
A
Diplomatic relations between two states are established by mutual consent.
B
The receiving state is not obliged to make an explanation in case of the refusal of agrément.
C
The receiving state has the right to declare the head of mission or a member of diplomatic staff as persona non grata (unwanted person) in any time and without an obligation to make an explanation.
D
It states the functions of diplomatic missions.
E
It states and regulates immunities of diplomatic missions.
Açıklama:
According to the 2nd Article of the convention, diplomatic relations between two states are established by mutual consent. In other words, two states have to be willing to conduct diplomatic relations.
The receiving state is not obliged to make an explanation in case of the refusal of agrément. (Vienna Convention, 4th Article)
The receiving state has the right to declare the head of mission or a member of diplomatic staff as persona non grata (unwanted person) in any time and without an obligation to make an explanation. In such cases, the sending state has to recall this person or terminate his functions in the mission. (Vienna Convention, 9th Article)
Functions of diplomatic missions are defined in the 3rd article of Vienna Convention. Accordingly, diplomatic missions are responsible for “representing the sending State in the receiving State; protecting the interests of the sending State and its nationals in the receiving State within the limits of the international law; negotiating with the Government of the receiving State on behalf of his government; ascertaining by all lawful means conditions and developments in the receiving State, and reporting to his government; promoting friendly relations between the sending State and the receiving State, and developing their economic, cultural and scientific relations.”
Articles 22nd to 28th regulate immunities of diplomatic missions. In accordance with these articles, “the premises of the mission shall be inviolable. The agents of the receiving State may not enter them, except with the consent of the head of the mission”.
The receiving state is not obliged to make an explanation in case of the refusal of agrément. (Vienna Convention, 4th Article)
The receiving state has the right to declare the head of mission or a member of diplomatic staff as persona non grata (unwanted person) in any time and without an obligation to make an explanation. In such cases, the sending state has to recall this person or terminate his functions in the mission. (Vienna Convention, 9th Article)
Functions of diplomatic missions are defined in the 3rd article of Vienna Convention. Accordingly, diplomatic missions are responsible for “representing the sending State in the receiving State; protecting the interests of the sending State and its nationals in the receiving State within the limits of the international law; negotiating with the Government of the receiving State on behalf of his government; ascertaining by all lawful means conditions and developments in the receiving State, and reporting to his government; promoting friendly relations between the sending State and the receiving State, and developing their economic, cultural and scientific relations.”
Articles 22nd to 28th regulate immunities of diplomatic missions. In accordance with these articles, “the premises of the mission shall be inviolable. The agents of the receiving State may not enter them, except with the consent of the head of the mission”.
Soru 50
Which option gives wrong information about non-governmental organizations?
Seçenekler
A
NGOs are interested in global problems such as global warming.
B
These entities are organizing campaigns in these issues and aiming to consolidate and influence world public opinion.
C
As global problems get more complex, NGOs become more influential.
D
They are independent from governments.
E
They collect donations from states.
Açıklama:
NGOs are non-governmental and non-profit organizations interested in global problems such as global warming, pollution, human rights, children’s rights, health problems, refugees and so on. These entities are organizing campaigns in these issues and aiming to consolidate and influence world public opinion. As global problems get more complex, NGOs become more influential. They are independent from governments and donated by individuals rather than states.
Soru 51
Which of the following is regarded as the beginning of modern and secular state formation in diplomatic history?
Seçenekler
A
Westphalia Treaty
B
Thirty Years War
C
The Cold War
D
The French Revolution
E
League of Nations
Açıklama:
Westphalia Treaty is regarded as the beginning of modern and secular state formation in diplomatic history.
Soru 52
Which of the following was established to protect status quo after Napoleonic Wars?
Seçenekler
A
League of Nations
B
United Nations
C
NATO
D
The French Revolution
E
Concert of Europe
Açıklama:
Concert of Europe
Soru 53
Which of the following is not one of the international developments shaping the institutions and instruments of modern diplomacy?
Seçenekler
A
Westphalia Treaty
B
World War I
C
Napoleonic Wars
D
Renaissance
E
Reformation
Açıklama:
Napoleonic Wars is not one of the international developments shaping the institutions and instruments of modern diplomacy.
Soru 54
Which of the following is an example of defacto recognitionof two countries?
Seçenekler
A
Israel- Palestine
B
England- Turkish Republilc of Northern Cyprus
C
Turkey- Turkish Republilc of Northern Cyprus
D
Turkey-Armenia
E
America-Canada
Açıklama:
Turkish Republic recognized Armenia, but they don’t conduct diplomatic relations.
Soru 55
Which of the following was the starting point for Multilateral diplomacy?
Seçenekler
A
League of Nations
B
Vienna Congress
C
The French Revolution
D
Berlin Congress
E
WWI
Açıklama:
Vienna Congress was the starting point for Multilateral diplomacy.
Soru 56
Which of the following is not one of the advantages of multilateral conferences?
Seçenekler
A
Focusing on specific issues
B
Motivating the parties to find a solution
C
Increasing the prestige of participants
D
Providing a medium for the development of bilateral relations
E
Increasing trade between countries
Açıklama:
Increasing trade between countries is not one of the advantages of multilateral conferences
Soru 57
Which one was a turning point in the development of multilateral organizations ?
Seçenekler
A
WWII
B
The French Revolution
C
Berlin Congress
D
WWI
E
Vienna Congress
Açıklama:
WWI was a turning point in the development of multilateral organizations.
Soru 58
Which one of the following is an example of ad hoc summit?
Seçenekler
A
Regular European Union meetings
B
SALT
C
Camp David meetings
D
START
E
Security council
Açıklama:
Camp David meetings is an example of ad hoc summit
Soru 59
Which of the following is not one of the main duties of ministry of foreign affairs?
Seçenekler
A
Coordination of foreign policy
B
Formulation of foreign policy
C
Establishment of diplomatic missions in foreign countries
D
Recruitment diplomatic personnel
E
Training of diplomatic personnel
Açıklama:
Formulation of foreign policy is not one of the main duties of ministry of foreign affairs
Soru 60
With which of the following NGO is not interested in?
Seçenekler
A
International trade
B
Global warming
C
Pollution
D
Human rights
E
Children’s rights
Açıklama:
NGO is not interested in international trade
Soru 61
Origins of the modern diplomacy can be traced back to______?
Seçenekler
A
City States of Venice
B
City States of France
C
City States of Italy
D
City States of Germany
E
City States of England
Açıklama:
Origins of modern diplomacy date back to Italian city states in the 14th century.
Soru 62
Which of the following can be considered as the first international conference of the European states?
Seçenekler
A
Berlin Congress
B
Vienna Congress
C
Paris Peace Conference
D
San Francisco Conference
E
Westphalia Treaty
Açıklama:
This treaty is regarded as the beginning of modern and secular state formation in diplomatic history. Westphalia Treaty can be considered as the first international conference of the European states which ended Thirty Years War between Habsburgs and Bourbons in 1648.
Soru 63
Which of the following is the predecessor of the United Nations?
Seçenekler
A
NATO
B
European Union
C
WHO
D
League of Nations
E
WWO
Açıklama:
This institution was the predecessor of the United Nations which was established by the victorious states of WWI on January 10, 1920.
Soru 64
Which of the following is one of the main actors of UN?
Seçenekler
A
Russia
B
Japan
C
Korea
D
Turkey
E
Iran
Açıklama:
Main actors in the UN are the United States, Russia (formerly the Soviet Union), the Great Britain, France and China.
Soru 65
Which of the following is the correct abbreviation for non-profit, voluntary citizens’ organizations acting on national, regional or international levels out of the jurisdiction of states.
Seçenekler
A
MNC
B
NGO
C
SALT
D
EU
E
ASEAN
Açıklama:
NGOs are non-profit, voluntary citizens’ organizations acting on national, regional or international levels out of the jurisdiction of states. They provide monitoring for the implementation of decisions and treaties on various issues ranging from environment to human rights.
Soru 66
Which department conducts foreign relations for the USA?
Seçenekler
A
State Department
B
Ministry of Foreign Affairs
C
Foreign Ministry
D
Foreign Office
E
Office of Foreign Relations
Açıklama:
Ministry of foreign affairs have different names in different countries like Foreign Office in the UK and State Department in the US.
Soru 67
Which of the following had the first professional ministry of foreign affairs established?
Seçenekler
A
Sweden
B
The United States
C
Germany
D
England
E
France
Açıklama:
The first ministry of foreign affairs in today’s understanding was established in France in the 1620s by Cardinal Richelieu after three centuries from the establishment of modern diplomatic missions.
Soru 68
Until the end of WWI, what was the main instrument of diplomacy?
Seçenekler
A
Conference Diplomacy
B
Bilateral Diplomacy
C
Multilateral Diplomacy
D
Summit Diplomacy
E
Cyber Diplomacy
Açıklama:
Until the end of WWI, bilateral diplomacy kept its hegemony in the international relations.
Soru 69
Which of the following is established after WWII to provide peace in the world?
Seçenekler
A
NATO
B
Warsaw Pact
C
League of Nations
D
European Union
E
United Nations
Açıklama:
The basic objective of the UN is to protect sovereignty of its member states and world peace.
Soru 70
What was the turning point in the formation of multilateral diplomacy?
Seçenekler
A
Vienna Congress
B
Westphalia Treaty
C
Paris Peace Conference
D
Berlin Congress
E
San Francisco Conference
Açıklama:
Multilateral diplomacy became popular after WWII although it was originated from the Vienna Congress in 1815 due to the diversification of problems in this period.
Soru 71
"Globalization resulted in the diversification of diplomatic institutions and changed functions and roles of ministries of foreign affairs and diplomatic missions. Non-state actors like non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and multinational companies (MNCs) were involved in diplomatic practices. Although the state and its institutions are at the center of diplomatic activities, the influence of non-state actors in international relations and diplomacy is indisputable".
Which factor significantly impacted diplomatic practices according to the above mentioned-text?
Which factor significantly impacted diplomatic practices according to the above mentioned-text?
Seçenekler
A
Globalization
B
Political instability
C
Cultural exchange
D
Technological advancements
E
Economic fluctuations
Açıklama:
Globalization resulted in the diversification of diplomatic institutions and changed functions and roles of ministries of foreign affairs and diplomatic missions. So, the globalisation is a factor significantly impacting diplomatic practices.
Ünite 6
Soru 1
Which one is not one of the structural factors that have produced long-term impact on Turkish diplomacy?
Seçenekler
A
Ottoman Legacy
B
Westernization
C
Ataturk’s Legacy
D
Geography is the Destiny
E
International System
Açıklama:
International System is one of the Temporal and Conjectural Factors.
Soru 2
What is 'the state is the main diplomatic and security actor' related to?
Seçenekler
A
Westernization
B
Ottoman Legacy
C
Ataturk’s Legacy
D
Geography is the Destiny
E
Political Ideologies
Açıklama:
The first legacy that the rulers of the Turkish republic inherited from the Ottoman past is that the state is the main diplomatic and security actor.
Soru 3
When did Turkey become the member of NATO?
Seçenekler
A
1923
B
1940
C
1952
D
1961
E
1982
Açıklama:
Turkey’s been the member of NATO since 1952.
Soru 4
When was Hatay incorporated into Turkey?
Seçenekler
A
1939
B
1921
C
1923
D
1938
E
1926
Açıklama:
Hatay was incorporated into Turkey in 1939.
Soru 5
Which time period of Turkey corresponds to a bipolar international structure and a high level confrontation between the US- led Western liberal democratic countries and the communist countries of the Soviet block?
Seçenekler
A
1923-1939
B
1945-1960
C
1980-1991
D
1921-1938
E
1938-1961
Açıklama:
The time period between 1945 and 1960 corresponds to a bipolar international structure and a high level confrontation between the US- led Western liberal democratic countries and the communist countries of the Soviet block.
Soru 6
When did Turkey have to discover the importance of the strategic relations with the Western world once again as the change of regime Iran and the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan increased the tension between the two blocks?
Seçenekler
A
1940s
B
1950s
C
1960s
D
1970s
E
1980s
Açıklama:
Turkey had to discover the importance of the strategic relations with the Western world once again as the change of regime Iran and the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan increased the tension between the two blocks in 1980s.
Soru 7
When did Turkey try to strike a balance between pursuing a more independent/multidirectional foreign policy stance on the one hand and increasing its efforts to solidify its presence in the Western international community on the other?
Seçenekler
A
1950s
B
1960s
C
1980s
D
1990s
E
2000s
Açıklama:
Turkey tried to strike a balance between pursuing a more independent/multidirectional foreign policy stance on the one hand and increasing its efforts to solidify its presence in the Western international community on the other in 1990s.
Soru 8
When did Turkey shift to a more multi-directional and multi-dimensional foreign policy stance as the so-called détente caused a softening of the bipolar confrontation between Western and eastern blocks?
Seçenekler
A
between 1923 and 1945
B
between 1960 and 1980
C
between 1950 and 1960
D
between 1980 and 1990
E
between 1990 and 2000
Açıklama:
For about twenty years between 1960 and 1980, Turkey shifted to a more multi-directional and multi-dimensional foreign policy stance as the so-called détente caused a softening of the bipolar confrontation between Western and eastern blocks.
Soru 9
Which one is not one of the Ottoman Legacy?
Seçenekler
A
The state is the main diplomatic and security actor.
B
Turkey is defined as the crown jewel in geopolitical power struggles among external actors.
C
Diplomatic and foreign policy issues need to be dealt with secretly and behind closed doors
D
Imperial mentality that Turkey has long been seen as the continuation of the Empire.
E
Maximalist and irredentist claims
Açıklama:
Maximalist and irredentist claims have never shaped Turkey’s republican era diplomatic initiatives.
Soru 10
Which factor did not motivate Turkey to join NATO?
Seçenekler
A
Security oriented reasons
B
United States attributed a tremendous importance to Turkey’s geopolitical position and military capacity in the context of Cold War’s security dynamics.
C
To be a milestone in Turkey’s decades-old Westernization/ Europeanization/modernization process
D
Turkey’s internalization of Western values and norms to be much easier
E
The quality of Turkey’s relations with European allies have begun to be much more dependent on the pace of Turkey’s accession process with the European Union.
Açıklama:
Another factor that has proved to be effective in shaping Turkey’s attitude towards NATO in the post-Cold War era is that the quality of Turkey’s relations with European allies have begun to be much more dependent on the pace of Turkey’s accession process with the European Union. As Turkey’s contribution to Europe’s security within NATO has gradually become less-emphasized, absent the common Soviet threat, the quality of Turkey’s relations with European states has become very much a function of Turkey’s EU membership process. In an environment in which the number of people who argued that NATO would remain either ‘out of area’ or ‘out of business’ increased and Turkey’s security began to be increasingly affected by the developments taking place in non-European geographies, it has become more difficult to build Turkey’s foreign and security policies primarily on the Western axis, of which NATO has been the most important component.
Soru 11
Which of the following is the first legacy that the rulers of the Turkish republic inherited from the Ottoman past?
Seçenekler
A
The state is the main diplomatic and security actor
B
State is the main actor that provides security
C
State elites define issues to be considered as security issues
D
Security interests are defined in reference to the survival of the state
E
Security interests are defined in reference to well-being of the state
Açıklama:
The first legacy that the rulers of the Turkish republic inherited from the Ottoman past is that the state is the main diplomatic and security actor. National security and foreign policy interests have long been defined from the perspective of the state. There is a strong state tradition in Turkey (Heper, 1985). State is the main actor that provides security; state elites define which issues should be considered as security issues; security interests are defined in reference to the survival and well-being of the state. For a long time, the prevailing understanding was that issues of diplomacy, foreign policy and national security were so much existential and vital that they should not be left to the discretion of the politicians who only think how they can win upcoming elections and remain in power. State elites would, on the other hand, put national interests at the center of their behaviors and approach vitally important issues from the perspective of state.
Soru 12
Which of the following is an aspect of the Ottoman legacy in terms of diplomacy and foreign policy?
Seçenekler
A
Open discussion of such issues before the public is generally seen as safe
B
Policy issues need to be dealt with secretly and behind closed doors
C
Diplomatic issues require politicians as well as state elites
D
The participation of civil society in foreign policy has been quite limitless
E
Diplomacy has always been the privilege civil society and non-state actors in Turkey
Açıklama:
Another aspect of the Ottoman legacy is that diplomatic and foreign policy issues need to be dealt with secretly and behind closed doors. Open discussion of such issues before the public is generally seen as risky. Diplomatic issues require expertise. For a long time, only the state elites nested in bureaucracy were assumed to have possessed this expertise. The participation of civil society and non-state actors in the formulation of Turkey’s foreign policy interests has been quite limited compared to liberal democratic countries in the West. Diplomacy has always been the privilege of state elites in Turkey. It is during the process of Europeanization and democratization that civil society has finally begun to acquire an important role in Turkish diplomacy. It is now the case that both elected politicians are more knowledgeable than before about foreign policy and diplomatic issues and think tanks have mushroomed as institutional platforms offering expert-help to decision makers.
Soru 13
In terms of diplomacy and foreign policy which of the following is not an imperial mentality that the Turkish Republic inherited from the Ottomans?
Seçenekler
A
Turkey has long been seen as the continuation of the Empire
B
Civil society has begun to acquire an important role in diplomacy
C
Diplomacy has always been the privilege of state elites
D
Politicians are more knowledgeable about foreign policy and diplomatic issues
E
Europeanization and democratization has given civil society an important role in diplomacy
Açıklama:
Diplomacy has always been the privilege of state elites in Turkey. It is during the process of Europeanization and democratization that civil society has finally begun to acquire an important role in Turkish diplomacy. It is now the case that both elected politicians are more knowledgeable than before about foreign policy and diplomatic issues and think tanks have mushroomed as institutional platforms offering expert-help to decision makers. Turkish rulers have also inherited an imperial mentality from the Ottoman era in that Turkey has long been seen as the continuation of the Empire. The imperial mentality also manifests itself in the way how Turkish rulers interact with their counterparts in other countries. Turkish rulers tend to speak with foreigners as if today’s Turkey is the Ottoman Empire of the sixteenth century. Longing for respect, equality and status very much shapes Turkey’s relations with much powerful countries. Imperial mentality also suggests that Turkey holds itself responsible for the well-being of people living in the post-Ottoman geography. The practice of defining Turkey as a responsible diplomatic actor that should contribute to the solution of regional and global humanitarian, developmental and security problems has strengthened during the reign of Justice and Development Party governments since 2002. The imperial mentality seems to have made itself appear in the foreign policy discourse of the AKP era politicians. For example, former Prime Minster Ahmet Davutoglu quite often said that the scope of Turkish diplomacy is global and Turkey should act as an order-creator country in its environment. The circles that see Turkey through imperial eyes find it difficult to understand that the Republic of Turkey constitutes a break with the Ottoman past.
Soru 14
Since when has balance of powers politics shaped Turkish diplomacy?
Seçenekler
A
Since the early 1920s
B
Since the early 1930s
C
Since the early 1940s
D
Since the early 1950s
E
Since the early 1960s
Açıklama:
Balance of powers politics has shaped Turkish diplomacy since the early 1920s. Signing strategic cooperation agreements with Britain and France on the eve of the World War II and joining NATO in 1952 should be understood as Turkey’s efforts to achieve its security interests through alliance politics.
Soru 15
Since when have Turkey’s efforts to join the key Western/European international organizations gone hand in hand transformation process at home in line with the constitutive norms and values of Western international community?
Seçenekler
A
Since the second half of the eighteenth century
B
Since the first half of the nineteenth century
C
Since the second half of the nineteenth century
D
Since the first half of the twentieth century
E
Since the second half of the twentieth century
Açıklama:
Since the second half of the nineteenth century Turkey’s efforts to join the key Western/ European international organizations, viz. external Westernization, has gone hand in hand with the transformation process at home in line with the constitutive norms and values of Western international community, viz. internal Westernization.
Soru 16
Which of the following is a true statement in the foreign policy and diplomacy of Turkey in terms of Westernization?
Seçenekler
A
Westernization is accepted as a security strategy
B
Westerners would recognize Turkey as European
C
Westernization has just negative connotations
D
Europeans seem enthusiastic to admit Turkey to EU
E
Turks love and hate Westerners simultaneously
Açıklama:
Westernization is also thought of a security strategy in that Turkey would feel itself safe and secure if it came closer to the West/Europe and its Western/European identity were recognized as such by Westerners/Europeans (Oğuzlu, 2003, 285- 299). Given that the Ottoman Empire came to an end at the hands of the Western European nations, the founding fathers of the Republic assumed that Turkey’s security would improve, if Europeans saw Turkey as a member of the Western/European family of nations.
This process has both negative and positive connotations in the context of Turkish diplomatic history. Turks love and hate Westerners simultaneously. The negative experiences of the Ottoman past would assumingly be left behind if Turkey completed its Westernization process. However, whenever Westerners/Europeans questioned the credentials of Turkey’s Western identity, the dominant view on the part of the majority of Turks happened to be that Westerners did never and would never recognize Turkey as Western/European. For example, the reluctance of Europeans to admit Turkey to EU membership has generally been interpreted as the continuation of the traditional European attitude towards Turkey, according to which Turks have been among the constitutive others of Europeans.
This process has both negative and positive connotations in the context of Turkish diplomatic history. Turks love and hate Westerners simultaneously. The negative experiences of the Ottoman past would assumingly be left behind if Turkey completed its Westernization process. However, whenever Westerners/Europeans questioned the credentials of Turkey’s Western identity, the dominant view on the part of the majority of Turks happened to be that Westerners did never and would never recognize Turkey as Western/European. For example, the reluctance of Europeans to admit Turkey to EU membership has generally been interpreted as the continuation of the traditional European attitude towards Turkey, according to which Turks have been among the constitutive others of Europeans.
Soru 17
Which of the following is not a characteristics of Ataturk’s diplomatic legacy?
Seçenekler
A
This required the pursuit of a pragmatic foreign policy
B
This required the pursuit of a prudent foreign policy
C
This required the pursuit of a realist foreign policy
D
This required involvement in the internal affairs of other states
E
It is based on the idea that states are independent
Açıklama:
Ataturk’s Legacy
To Mustafa Kemal Ataturk, the founder of the Republic, and his comrades in arms, Turkey’s number one national interest during the 1920s and 1930s was to protect the newly gained independence and sovereignty as well as successfully completing the radical transformation process at home (Hale, 2013, 31055). This required the pursuit of a pragmatic, prudent and realist foreign policy, enshrining the principle of ‘peace at home peace in the world’. Turkish rulers tried to help bring into existence a stable and cooperative regional environment so that developments outside the borders would never have negative consequences on the ongoing modernization and development processes at home. In this sense, there seems to exist a strong degree of continuity between Turkey’s efforts to support regional cooperation during the interwar years through the Balkan Entente and Saadabad Pact and the attempts of the Justice and Development Party governments at encouraging regional cooperation initiatives over the last fifteen years.
Pragmatism also suggested that Turkey would do well to construct friendly relations with former enemies. Involvement in the internal affairs of other states and pursuit of expansionist and irredentist foreign policies do not hold any place in Ataturk’s diplomatic legacy. This is the main reason why any attempt at regime change abroad is very much criticized at home. Traditional Turkish diplomacy is based on the idea that states are independent in their internal affairs and Turkey should not be involved in the business of regime change or value promotion. Trying to solve national security problems through diplomacy and international law is another legacy of Ataturk. The revision of the Lausanne regulations on the status of Turkish Straits through the Montreux Convention in 1936, the incorporation of Hatay region into Turkey in 1939, and the settlement of the Mousul question and the border dispute with Iraq in 1926 are all examples to the use of international law and diplomacy in Turkish foreign policy. Diplomacy backed by hard power capability and diplomatic initiatives conferring legitimacy on military victories constitute the backbone of Ataturk’s diplomatic legacy.
To Mustafa Kemal Ataturk, the founder of the Republic, and his comrades in arms, Turkey’s number one national interest during the 1920s and 1930s was to protect the newly gained independence and sovereignty as well as successfully completing the radical transformation process at home (Hale, 2013, 31055). This required the pursuit of a pragmatic, prudent and realist foreign policy, enshrining the principle of ‘peace at home peace in the world’. Turkish rulers tried to help bring into existence a stable and cooperative regional environment so that developments outside the borders would never have negative consequences on the ongoing modernization and development processes at home. In this sense, there seems to exist a strong degree of continuity between Turkey’s efforts to support regional cooperation during the interwar years through the Balkan Entente and Saadabad Pact and the attempts of the Justice and Development Party governments at encouraging regional cooperation initiatives over the last fifteen years.
Pragmatism also suggested that Turkey would do well to construct friendly relations with former enemies. Involvement in the internal affairs of other states and pursuit of expansionist and irredentist foreign policies do not hold any place in Ataturk’s diplomatic legacy. This is the main reason why any attempt at regime change abroad is very much criticized at home. Traditional Turkish diplomacy is based on the idea that states are independent in their internal affairs and Turkey should not be involved in the business of regime change or value promotion. Trying to solve national security problems through diplomacy and international law is another legacy of Ataturk. The revision of the Lausanne regulations on the status of Turkish Straits through the Montreux Convention in 1936, the incorporation of Hatay region into Turkey in 1939, and the settlement of the Mousul question and the border dispute with Iraq in 1926 are all examples to the use of international law and diplomacy in Turkish foreign policy. Diplomacy backed by hard power capability and diplomatic initiatives conferring legitimacy on military victories constitute the backbone of Ataturk’s diplomatic legacy.
Soru 18
Which of the following is a true statement in Turkish foreign policy and diplomacy when Turkey’s geographical location is considered?
Seçenekler
A
Turkey joined NATO in 1952 to deal with the Iran challenge
B
Turkey’s geography has been both an asset and liability
C
Its geography has always come to the agenda in the context of the migration crisis
D
Turkey is not characterized as a buffer-zone and insulator country by Europeans
E
Depiction of Turkey as a ‘bridge’ by Westerners does not relate to Turkey’s geographical location
Açıklama:
Geography is the Destiny
Turkey’s geographical location has always been the most important leverage in Turkey’s relations with other countries. Despite the danger of exaggerating ‘geographical determinism’, it would not be wrong to argue that Turkey’s diplomatic relations and foreign policy record during much of the Republican era have been deeply informed by Turkey’s geography (Aydin, 2003, 163-184). Turkey’s geography has been both an asset and liability. Turkey’s decision to join NATO as well as being in the crosshairs of global powers can be convincingly attributed to its geographical location. Being located at the intersection point of three continents, Turkey has continuously attracted the attention of other countries, notably the great powers which have had vital security interests in Turkey’s regional environment.
The United States defined Turkey as the unsinkable aircraft carrier during the Cold War. The Soviet Union wanted to get control of the straits and eastern part of Anatolia in the immediate aftermath of the World War II and this prompted Turkey to seek security cooperation with the United States. Turkey joined NATO in 1952 to deal with the Soviet challenge much better. Turkey’s efforts to become an energy hub during the post-Cold War era are noticeable. In its effort to convince the Europeans to the idea of Turkey’s membership in the European Union, Turkish rulers have continuously instrumentalized Turkey’s geographical location as a bargaining chip. Turkey’s geography has recently come to the agenda in the context of the migration crisis engulfing European countries. The migration deal that Turkey signed with the European Union in the spring of 2016 is very much the function of Turkey’s peculiar geography in the context of European efforts to stem the refugee flow emanating from the Greater Middle Eastern region. The main reason why the island of Cyprus occupies a very important place in Turkish foreign policy is Cyprus’s geographical proximity to Anatolian peninsula as well as the recent discovery of rich natural gas resources in Eastern Mediterranean.
The reason why Europeans could not easily give up on Turkey can also be boiled down to Turkey’s potential contribution to European security. Hence, Turkey is mainly characterized as a buffer-zone and insulator country by Europeans. Underlining Turkey’s potential contribution to the protection of the Kantian security environment inside the EU against the security challenges emanating from the Hobbesian security environment in the Middle East has decisively colored Turkey’s discourse with Western/European countries. Depiction of Turkey as a ‘bridge’ and ‘role model’ by Westerners does also relate to Turkey’s geographical location.
Turkey’s geography does also suggest that Turkey should always be alerted to potential threats posed to its security as well as maintaining strong and credible armed forces. Of all the reasons of military’s key role in Turkish diplomacy, the need to have a powerful army in this fragile and delicate geographical location proves to be decisive.
Turkey’s geographical location has always been the most important leverage in Turkey’s relations with other countries. Despite the danger of exaggerating ‘geographical determinism’, it would not be wrong to argue that Turkey’s diplomatic relations and foreign policy record during much of the Republican era have been deeply informed by Turkey’s geography (Aydin, 2003, 163-184). Turkey’s geography has been both an asset and liability. Turkey’s decision to join NATO as well as being in the crosshairs of global powers can be convincingly attributed to its geographical location. Being located at the intersection point of three continents, Turkey has continuously attracted the attention of other countries, notably the great powers which have had vital security interests in Turkey’s regional environment.
The United States defined Turkey as the unsinkable aircraft carrier during the Cold War. The Soviet Union wanted to get control of the straits and eastern part of Anatolia in the immediate aftermath of the World War II and this prompted Turkey to seek security cooperation with the United States. Turkey joined NATO in 1952 to deal with the Soviet challenge much better. Turkey’s efforts to become an energy hub during the post-Cold War era are noticeable. In its effort to convince the Europeans to the idea of Turkey’s membership in the European Union, Turkish rulers have continuously instrumentalized Turkey’s geographical location as a bargaining chip. Turkey’s geography has recently come to the agenda in the context of the migration crisis engulfing European countries. The migration deal that Turkey signed with the European Union in the spring of 2016 is very much the function of Turkey’s peculiar geography in the context of European efforts to stem the refugee flow emanating from the Greater Middle Eastern region. The main reason why the island of Cyprus occupies a very important place in Turkish foreign policy is Cyprus’s geographical proximity to Anatolian peninsula as well as the recent discovery of rich natural gas resources in Eastern Mediterranean.
The reason why Europeans could not easily give up on Turkey can also be boiled down to Turkey’s potential contribution to European security. Hence, Turkey is mainly characterized as a buffer-zone and insulator country by Europeans. Underlining Turkey’s potential contribution to the protection of the Kantian security environment inside the EU against the security challenges emanating from the Hobbesian security environment in the Middle East has decisively colored Turkey’s discourse with Western/European countries. Depiction of Turkey as a ‘bridge’ and ‘role model’ by Westerners does also relate to Turkey’s geographical location.
Turkey’s geography does also suggest that Turkey should always be alerted to potential threats posed to its security as well as maintaining strong and credible armed forces. Of all the reasons of military’s key role in Turkish diplomacy, the need to have a powerful army in this fragile and delicate geographical location proves to be decisive.
Soru 19
Which of the following is a characteristics Turkish foreign policy and diplomacy over the last decade particularly following the global financial crisis in 2008?
Seçenekler
A
Turkey has to pursue a predominantly pro-Western foreign policy course
B
Rulers concluded that the pursuit of pro-Western foreign policy stance did not yield expected benefits
C
Turkey has predominantly followed a pro-Western foreign policy stance
D
Turkey has followed a more multi-directional and multi-dimensional foreign policy stance
E
Turkey tried to strike a balance between a more independent/multidirectional foreign policy stance
Açıklama:
During the Second World War, Turkey continued the multi-directional foreign policy stance of the interwar period and pursued the so-called active neutrality foreign policy (Vanderlippe, 2003, 63-80). Rather than siding with one side of the warring parties, Turkey tried to benefit from the geopolitical rivalries between the axis powers on the one hand and the allied countries on the other.
The time period between 1945 and 1960 corresponds to a bipolar international structure and a high level confrontation between the US-led Western liberal democratic countries and the communist countries of the Soviet block. Turkey felt itself under Soviet threat and wanted to join the Western international community in such a way to counterbalance the existential threat to the north. Following its admission to NATO and given the increasing tension between the two power blocks, Turkey had to pursue a predominantly pro-Western foreign policy course. The rigid atmosphere of the early Cold War years did not offer Turkey the ability to adopt neutrality and pursue an independent/non-aligned foreign policy course. Turkey’s maneuvering capability was extremely limited during this era.
For about twenty years between 1960 and 1980, Turkey shifted to a more multi-directional and multi-dimensional foreign policy stance as the so-called détente caused a softening of the bipolar confrontation between Western and eastern blocks (Hale, 2013, 104-134). Turkish rulers came to the conclusion that the pursuit of extremely pro- Western foreign policy stance of the previous era did not yield expected benefits. As the United States and the Soviet Union began to search for ways to live in peaceful co-existence, Turkey felt more capable of charting its own ways through regional activism.
During the 1980s, Turkey had to discover the importance of the strategic relations with the Western world once again as the change of regime Iran and the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan increased the tension between the two blocks. The second arrival of the Cold War era confrontation helped increase Turkey’s geopolitical significance in Western eyes. During the 1980s, Turkey predominantly followed a pro-Western foreign policy stance despite the emergence of some problems in relations with Western countries. Turkey’s maneuvering capability in its foreign policy radically improved with the dissolution of the Soviet Union and the end of the Cold War. No longer feeling the pressure to the north, Turkey could pursue active and assertive policies in the Balkans, Caucasus, Central Asia and Middle East. Even though the evaporation of the Soviet threat contributed to the erosion of the strategic bond between Turkey and its Western allies, membership in NATO and the prospective membership in European Union preserved their primacy in Turkey’s strategic thinking. The pro-Western stance in Turkish foreign policy was also enabled by the US-led unipolar structure of the international system, the growing appeal of the constitutive norms of the Western international community as well as the perception of Turkey in the West as a successful role model for the countries that regained their independence in the post-Soviet geography. The 1990s could be seen as a period in which Turkey tried to strike a balance between pursuing a more independent/multidirectional foreign policy stance on the one hand and increasing its efforts to solidify its presence in the Western international community on the other. While the end of the Cold War seems to have increased Turkey’s maneuvering capability, the gradual erosion of Turkey’s strategic value in the eyes of Western/European allies absent the common communism threat pushed Turkish leaders to help reassert Turkey’s Western/European identity through NATO and the European Union.
The shift to a more multipolar system over the last decade, particularly following the global financial crisis in 2008, and the spectacular increase in Turkey’s material power capabilities seem to have encouraged Turkish rulers to follow a more multi-directional and multi-dimensional foreign policy stance. During this era, Turkey has been in search for more strategic autonomy (Öniş and Yılmaz, 2009, 7-24). The relative decline of Western powers, the questioning of the Western model across the globe, the concomitant rise of non-Western powers in global politics and the onset of the Arab Spring seem to have all caused a shift of axis in Turkish foreign policy away from the West to the East. Turkey acting as a ‘central country’ and pursuing a ‘Eurasianist’ foreign policy stance became quite visible during this era.
The time period between 1945 and 1960 corresponds to a bipolar international structure and a high level confrontation between the US-led Western liberal democratic countries and the communist countries of the Soviet block. Turkey felt itself under Soviet threat and wanted to join the Western international community in such a way to counterbalance the existential threat to the north. Following its admission to NATO and given the increasing tension between the two power blocks, Turkey had to pursue a predominantly pro-Western foreign policy course. The rigid atmosphere of the early Cold War years did not offer Turkey the ability to adopt neutrality and pursue an independent/non-aligned foreign policy course. Turkey’s maneuvering capability was extremely limited during this era.
For about twenty years between 1960 and 1980, Turkey shifted to a more multi-directional and multi-dimensional foreign policy stance as the so-called détente caused a softening of the bipolar confrontation between Western and eastern blocks (Hale, 2013, 104-134). Turkish rulers came to the conclusion that the pursuit of extremely pro- Western foreign policy stance of the previous era did not yield expected benefits. As the United States and the Soviet Union began to search for ways to live in peaceful co-existence, Turkey felt more capable of charting its own ways through regional activism.
During the 1980s, Turkey had to discover the importance of the strategic relations with the Western world once again as the change of regime Iran and the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan increased the tension between the two blocks. The second arrival of the Cold War era confrontation helped increase Turkey’s geopolitical significance in Western eyes. During the 1980s, Turkey predominantly followed a pro-Western foreign policy stance despite the emergence of some problems in relations with Western countries. Turkey’s maneuvering capability in its foreign policy radically improved with the dissolution of the Soviet Union and the end of the Cold War. No longer feeling the pressure to the north, Turkey could pursue active and assertive policies in the Balkans, Caucasus, Central Asia and Middle East. Even though the evaporation of the Soviet threat contributed to the erosion of the strategic bond between Turkey and its Western allies, membership in NATO and the prospective membership in European Union preserved their primacy in Turkey’s strategic thinking. The pro-Western stance in Turkish foreign policy was also enabled by the US-led unipolar structure of the international system, the growing appeal of the constitutive norms of the Western international community as well as the perception of Turkey in the West as a successful role model for the countries that regained their independence in the post-Soviet geography. The 1990s could be seen as a period in which Turkey tried to strike a balance between pursuing a more independent/multidirectional foreign policy stance on the one hand and increasing its efforts to solidify its presence in the Western international community on the other. While the end of the Cold War seems to have increased Turkey’s maneuvering capability, the gradual erosion of Turkey’s strategic value in the eyes of Western/European allies absent the common communism threat pushed Turkish leaders to help reassert Turkey’s Western/European identity through NATO and the European Union.
The shift to a more multipolar system over the last decade, particularly following the global financial crisis in 2008, and the spectacular increase in Turkey’s material power capabilities seem to have encouraged Turkish rulers to follow a more multi-directional and multi-dimensional foreign policy stance. During this era, Turkey has been in search for more strategic autonomy (Öniş and Yılmaz, 2009, 7-24). The relative decline of Western powers, the questioning of the Western model across the globe, the concomitant rise of non-Western powers in global politics and the onset of the Arab Spring seem to have all caused a shift of axis in Turkish foreign policy away from the West to the East. Turkey acting as a ‘central country’ and pursuing a ‘Eurasianist’ foreign policy stance became quite visible during this era.
Soru 20
Which of the following played a role in Türkiye (Turkey) changing its attitude towards the NATO Alliance for the first time?
Seçenekler
A
Turkey’s EU membership process
B
Arab Spring process
C
Developments in Syria
D
Developments in Iraq
E
End of Cold War
Açıklama:
After the Cold War ended and the threat stemming from the Soviet Union disappeared, Turkey’s attitude towards the Alliance has begun to change. In order to understand the dynamics of Turkey’s changing attitude towards the Alliance better, it would be useful to shed light on how Turkey’s security and identity definitions evolved. This situation has weakened NATO’s special and privileged position in the definition of Turkey’s foreign and security policies, for the need to rely on NATO’s nuclear security umbrella has dwindled. Besides, as Turkey’s maneuvering capability increased and its capacity to help shape regional developments became stronger, it has gradually become a necessity that Turkey adopts different methods and tools in its diplomacy.
Soru 21
In which year did Turkey become a member of NATO?
Seçenekler
A
1923
B
1931
C
1944
D
1952
E
1960
Açıklama:
Turkey’s membership in NATO since 1952 and the ongoing accession negotiations with the European Union are now the most important dimensions of Turkish foreign policy.
Soru 22
In which year was Hatay region incorporated into Turkey?
Seçenekler
A
1909
B
1919
C
1929
D
1939
E
1949
Açıklama:
The revision of the Lasuanne regulations on the status of Turkish Straits through the Montreaux Convention in 1936, the incorporation of Hatay region into Turkey in 1939, and the settlement of the Mousul question and the border dispute with Iraq in 1926 are all examples to the use of international law and diplomacy in Turkish foreign policy.
Soru 23
ın which of the following countries did the missile crisis take place in 1962?
Seçenekler
A
Turkey
B
Greece
C
Mexico
D
Cuba
E
Iraq
Açıklama:
Despite the Cuban missile crisis in 1962, the Johnson Letter crisis in 1964, the arms embargo crisis in 1975, and the anti-U.S. sentiments running high in the country from time to time; NATO preserved its privileged position in Turkish diplomacy during much of the Cold War period.
Soru 24
Turkey has been at odds with Russia over the developments in which of the following countries?
Seçenekler
A
Iran
B
Greece
C
Iraq
D
Moldova
E
Syria
Açıklama:
Turkey’s relations with Russia and Iran have dramatically improved as Turkey has gradually left the NATO-centered foreign and security policy mentality behind. This remains so despite the fact that Turkey has been at odds with Russia over the course of developments in Syria and Ukraine.
Soru 25
Soviet occupation of which country increased the tension between the two blocks again in 1980s?
Seçenekler
A
Iraq
B
Iran
C
Syria
D
Moldova
E
Afghanistan
Açıklama:
During the 1980s, Turkey had to discover the importance of the strategic relations with the Western world once again as the change of regime Iran and the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan increased the tension between the two blocks.
Soru 26
Which of the following time periods had a multipolar international and regional environment?
Seçenekler
A
1909-1919
B
1923-1939
C
1945-1960
D
1964-1976
E
1978-1988
Açıklama:
The time period between 1923 and 1939 had a multipolar international and regional environment with none of the great powers having the ability to set the course of international developments, let alone imposing its will on to others through unilateral and coercive means.
Soru 27
In which of the following years did the cartoon crisis against Muslims happen?
Seçenekler
A
1985
B
1995
C
2000
D
2005
E
2010
Açıklama:
Turkey initially opposed to the appointment of Denmark’s then-Prime Minister Rasmussen as NATO Secretary-General. The offensive attitude adopted by Rasmussen in the cartoon crisis against Muslims in 2005 was effective in Turkey’s opposition.
Soru 28
Which of the following was one of the countries that launched Libya operation?
Seçenekler
A
Britain
B
Italy
C
Spain
D
Turkey
E
Russia
Açıklama:
Turkey has at the same time paid an utmost care not to veto any particular decision should all other allies agree on. Turkey has not wanted to be seen as the maverick within the Alliance. The best example of this attitude took place on the occasion of NATO’s military operation in Libya. Turkey initially opposed to NATO’s intervention in Libya. This operation was at the beginning launched by Britain and France outside NATO framework and then taken over by the Alliance.
Soru 29
Which of the following is an area where Turkey wants to play an active role in NATO's efforts?
Seçenekler
A
Middle East
B
North America
C
Southern Europe
D
South Pacific
E
Northern Europe
Açıklama:
Turkey also wants to play an active role in NATO’s efforts to reach out to the Middle East, Eastern Mediterranean and Persian Gulf regions.
Soru 30
Turkey supported NATO’s expansion toward which of the following countries?
Seçenekler
A
Poland
B
Greece
C
Syria
D
Moldova
E
Russia
Açıklama:
Turkey supported NATO’s expansion toward Poland, Czech Republic and Hungary; Turkey participated in and led the multinational NATO forces in Afghanistan; Turkey took part in NATO’s limited involvement in Libya in 2011; Turkey let NATO install radar facilities of the missile defense system in its territories; and Turkey encouraged the Alliance in its efforts to help radiate NATO’s values to the countries, which are not to be NATO members, within the framework of NATO’s Partnership for Peace Program.
Soru 31
In Turkey, whose perspective have national security and foreign policy interests been defined from?
Seçenekler
A
State
B
Politicians
C
Military
D
The people
E
Minorities
Açıklama:
National security and foreign policy interests have long been defined from the perspective of the state. There is a strong state tradition in Turkey.
Issues of diplomacy, foreign policy and national security were so much existential and vital that they should not be left to the discretion of the politicians who only think how they can win upcoming elections and remain in power. State elites would, on the other hand, put national interests at the center of their behaviors and approach vitally important issues from the perspective of state.
Issues of diplomacy, foreign policy and national security were so much existential and vital that they should not be left to the discretion of the politicians who only think how they can win upcoming elections and remain in power. State elites would, on the other hand, put national interests at the center of their behaviors and approach vitally important issues from the perspective of state.
Soru 32
Which one is true for Turkey's view on its neighbors?
Seçenekler
A
They are all independent sovereigns.
B
Turkey is surrounded by allies.
C
Turkey defines itself as the crown jewel geopolitically.
D
Turkey's view is different than the Ottoman Empire's.
E
Turkey trusts its neighbors in terms of diplomacy.
Açıklama:
Turkey is defined as the crown jewel in geopolitical power struggles among external actors. Turkey is surrounded by enemies that would never hesitate to make use of any opportunity to dictate their terms on Turkey as well as to dismember this county. A strong dose of siege mentality exists among Turkish people. Turkish decision makers tend to perceive Turkey’s neighbors to all directions as the pawns in the hands of great powers, which would likely use them as leverage in their relations with Turkey. The facts that many neighbors of Turkey gained their independence from the Ottoman Empire and they were very much assisted by external great powers in their efforts seem to have led Turkish decision makers feel suspicious of Turkey’s neighbors.
Soru 33
Which one of the following is true for Turkish diplomacy?
Seçenekler
A
Foreign policy issues are dealt with publicly.
B
Anyone can be a part of diplomacy.
C
Civil society has a major role in the formulation of foreign policy.
D
Diplomacy has always been the privilege of state elites.
E
Elected politicians ignore foreign policy.
Açıklama:
Diplomatic and foreign policy issues need to be dealt with secretly and behind closed doors. Open discussion of such issues before the public is generally seen as risky. Diplomatic issues require expertise. For a long time, only the state elites nested in bureaucracy were assumed to have possessed this expertise. The participation of civil society and nonstate actors in the formulation of Turkey’s foreign policy interests has been quite limited compared to liberal democratic countries in the West. Diplomacy has always been the privilege of state elites in Turkey. It is during the process of Europeanization and democratization that civil society has finally begun to acquire an important role in Turkish diplomacy. It is now the case that both elected politicians are more knowledgeable than before about foreign policy and diplomatic issues.
Soru 34
Which of the following is NOT a legacy of the Ottoman Empire to the Republic of Turkey?
Seçenekler
A
Turkey is the continuation of the Empire and thus has the imperial mentality.
B
Securing military victories on battlefield ensures benefits for the country.
C
Pan-Turkism is still influential.
D
Pan-Ottomanism is effective even today.
E
Pan-Islamism can be considered present.
Açıklama:
Turkey would not be able to achieve its national interests if the gains of the wars won
on battlefields were not legitimized through diplomatic negotiations. Securing military victories on battlefields would not accrue benefits to Turkey, should they not be entrenched through diplomacy.
Turkish rulers have also inherited an imperial mentality from the Ottoman era in that Turkey has long been seen as the continuation of the Empire. The imperial mentality also manifests itself in the way how Turkish rulers interact with their counterparts in other countries.
Pan-Turkism, pan-Ottomanism and panIslamisim - have continued to influence Turkey’s diplomatic practices during the Republican era. Despite the fact that the founding rulers of the Turkish Republic discarded all adventurist strategies from the lexicon of state and heavily invested in Turkish nationalism, all the ‘isms’ mentioned have continued to be influential in coming decades.
on battlefields were not legitimized through diplomatic negotiations. Securing military victories on battlefields would not accrue benefits to Turkey, should they not be entrenched through diplomacy.
Turkish rulers have also inherited an imperial mentality from the Ottoman era in that Turkey has long been seen as the continuation of the Empire. The imperial mentality also manifests itself in the way how Turkish rulers interact with their counterparts in other countries.
Pan-Turkism, pan-Ottomanism and panIslamisim - have continued to influence Turkey’s diplomatic practices during the Republican era. Despite the fact that the founding rulers of the Turkish Republic discarded all adventurist strategies from the lexicon of state and heavily invested in Turkish nationalism, all the ‘isms’ mentioned have continued to be influential in coming decades.
Soru 35
What was Mustafa Kemal Ataturk's priority when the Republic of Turkey was newly founded?
Seçenekler
A
Stabilize economy
B
Allying with the neighboring countries
C
Expanding borders
D
Protecting independence
E
Improving military
Açıklama:
To Mustafa Kemal Ataturk, the founder of the Republic, and his comrades in arms, Turkey’s number one national interest during the 1920s and 1930s was to protect the newly gained independence and sovereignty as well as successfully completing the radical transformation process at home. Turkish rulers tried to help bring into existence a stable and cooperative regional environment so that developments outside the borders would never have negative consequences on the ongoing modernization and development processes at home.
Soru 36
What have Turkish rulers instrumentalized to convince the Europeans to the idea of Turkey’s membership in the European Union?
Seçenekler
A
Ataturk's principles
B
Natural gas resources in Turkey
C
Its geographical location
D
It being a mainly "Muslim" country
E
Workforce
Açıklama:
In its effort to convince the Europeans to the idea of Turkey’s membership in the European Union, Turkish rulers have continuously instrumentalized Turkey’s geographical location as a bargaining chip. Turkey’s geography has recently come to the agenda in the context of the migration crisis engulfing European countries.
The main reason why the island of Cyprus occupies a very important place in Turkish foreign policy is Cyprus’s geographical proximity to Anatolian peninsula as well as the recent discovery of rich natural gas resources in Eastern Mediterranean.
The main reason why the island of Cyprus occupies a very important place in Turkish foreign policy is Cyprus’s geographical proximity to Anatolian peninsula as well as the recent discovery of rich natural gas resources in Eastern Mediterranean.
Soru 37
Between 1923 and 1939, what kind of foreign policy did Turkey adopt?
Seçenekler
A
Remained neutral
B
Sided with the Soviet block
C
Sought to be the dominant power
D
Sided with the US-led countries
E
Followed a multi-directional foreign policy
Açıklama:
The time period between 1923 and 1939 had a multipolar international and regional environment with none of the great powers having the ability to set the course of international developments, let alone imposing its will on to others through unilateral and coercive means. During this period, Turkey’s maneuvering capability was high and Turkey pursued a multidirectional foreign policy.
Soru 38
Which of the following is not a reason why the axis of Turkish policy shifted away from the West to the East in the last couple of decades?
Seçenekler
A
Decline of Western powers
B
The questioning of the Western model around the world
C
The rise of non-Western powers in global politics
D
The onset of the Arab Spring
E
Secularism's losing its importance
Açıklama:
In the last few decades, Turkey has been in search for more strategic autonomy. The relative decline of Western powers, the questioning of the Western model across the globe, the concomitant rise of non-Western powers in global politics and the onset of the Arab Spring seem to have all caused a shift of axis in Turkish foreign policy away from the West to the East.
Soru 39
Which of the following is not a reason why Turkey's diplomatic practices have been improving in the last few decades?
Seçenekler
A
Changing the regime
B
Founding TRT-World
C
Making Turkish Airlines a global industry giant
D
Turkey’s strong military power capability
E
Intensifying the social and cultural exchanges with other countries
Açıklama:
Turkey’s strong military power capability constitutes the most important source of Turkish diplomacy.
Desecuritization of bilateral relations with neighboring countries, particularly with the ones located in the Middle East; helping bring into existence EU-like regional integration mechanisms in its region; investing in multilateral problems in its effort to find solutions to regional problems; taking ‘mediatory and facilitation initiatives’ in the solution of disputes between other countries’ and intensifying the social and cultural exchanges with other countries in social, cultural, tourism and educational levels all now shape Turkish diplomatic practices decisively.
Investing in public diplomacy initiatives, transforming the Turkish Airlines into one of the largest air-carriers all over the world, founding the English language TRT-World, redesigning the TRT as a multi-lingual broadcasting company, increasing humanitarian and development aids to poor and needy countries (Çelik and İşeri,
2016, 429-448), and establishing particular state institutions in charge of dealing with the problems of Turkish-origin people in the countries which host sizable Turkish communities can all be considered as important soft power initiatives.
Desecuritization of bilateral relations with neighboring countries, particularly with the ones located in the Middle East; helping bring into existence EU-like regional integration mechanisms in its region; investing in multilateral problems in its effort to find solutions to regional problems; taking ‘mediatory and facilitation initiatives’ in the solution of disputes between other countries’ and intensifying the social and cultural exchanges with other countries in social, cultural, tourism and educational levels all now shape Turkish diplomatic practices decisively.
Investing in public diplomacy initiatives, transforming the Turkish Airlines into one of the largest air-carriers all over the world, founding the English language TRT-World, redesigning the TRT as a multi-lingual broadcasting company, increasing humanitarian and development aids to poor and needy countries (Çelik and İşeri,
2016, 429-448), and establishing particular state institutions in charge of dealing with the problems of Turkish-origin people in the countries which host sizable Turkish communities can all be considered as important soft power initiatives.
Soru 40
Which of the following is an example of Turkey's new attitude towards NATO?
Seçenekler
A
Turkey opposed NATO’s expansion toward Poland, Czech Republic and Hungary
B
Turkey let NATO install radar facilities of the missile defense system in its territories
C
Turkey condemned the multinational NATO forces in Afghanistan
D
Turkey stood against NATO’s limited involvement in Libya in 2011
E
Turkey did not aid peacekeeping operations carried out by NATO in the Balkans
Açıklama:
Some examples of Turkey’s new attitude towards NATO as described above are as follows: Turkey provided military support to the peacekeeping operations carried out by NATO in the Balkans (especially in Bosnia and Kosovo); Turkey supported NATO’s expansion toward Poland, Czech Republic and Hungary; Turkey participated in and led the multinational NATO forces in Afghanistan; Turkey took part in NATO’s limited involvement in Libya in 2011; Turkey let NATO install radar facilities of the missile defense system in its territories; and Turkey encouraged the Alliance in its efforts to help radiate NATO’s values to the countries, which are not to be NATO members, within the framework of NATO’s Partnership for Peace Program.
Soru 41
Which one of the following factors that have shaped Turkey’s diplomatic and foreign policy asserts that the state is the main diplomatic and security actor?
Seçenekler
A
Ottoman Legacy
B
Westernization
C
Ataturk’s Legacy
D
Geography is the Destiny
E
International System
Açıklama:
The first legacy that the rulers of the Turkish
republic inherited from the Ottoman past is that
the state is the main diplomatic and security actor.
National security and foreign policy interests have
long been defined from the perspective of the
state.
republic inherited from the Ottoman past is that
the state is the main diplomatic and security actor.
National security and foreign policy interests have
long been defined from the perspective of the
state.
Soru 42
I. Pan-Turkism
II. Pan-Islamism
III. Pan-Westernism
Which one(s) of these is/are among the ideologies that continued to influence Turkey’s diplomatic practices during the Republican era?
II. Pan-Islamism
III. Pan-Westernism
Which one(s) of these is/are among the ideologies that continued to influence Turkey’s diplomatic practices during the Republican era?
Seçenekler
A
Only I
B
Only II
C
Only III
D
I-II
E
II-III
Açıklama:
Another legacy of the Ottoman years is that the
alternative ideologies and strategies that had once
come to the agenda in late 19th century with a view to ensuring the survival of the Ottoman Empire - namely pan-Turkism, pan-Ottomanism and panIslamisim - have continued to influence Turkey’s diplomatic practices during the Republican era.
alternative ideologies and strategies that had once
come to the agenda in late 19th century with a view to ensuring the survival of the Ottoman Empire - namely pan-Turkism, pan-Ottomanism and panIslamisim - have continued to influence Turkey’s diplomatic practices during the Republican era.
Soru 43
Which one of the following foreign policy factors is also thought of a security
strategy in that Turkey would feel itself safe and secure?
strategy in that Turkey would feel itself safe and secure?
Seçenekler
A
Ottoman Legacy
B
Westernization
C
Ataturk’s Legacy
D
Geography is the Destiny
E
International System
Açıklama:
Westernization is also thought of a security
strategy in that Turkey would feel itself safe and
secure if it came closer to the West/Europe and its
Western/European identity were recognized as such
by Westerners/Europeans
strategy in that Turkey would feel itself safe and
secure if it came closer to the West/Europe and its
Western/European identity were recognized as such
by Westerners/Europeans
Soru 44
When was Hatay region incorporated into Turkey?
Seçenekler
A
1937
B
1938
C
1939
D
1940
E
1941
Açıklama:
The revision of
the Lasuanne regulations on the status of Turkish
Straits through the Montreaux Convention in
1936, the incorporation of Hatay region into
Turkey in 1939, and the settlement of the Mousul
question and the border dispute with Iraq in 1926
are all examples to the use of international law and
diplomacy in Turkish foreign policy
the Lasuanne regulations on the status of Turkish
Straits through the Montreaux Convention in
1936, the incorporation of Hatay region into
Turkey in 1939, and the settlement of the Mousul
question and the border dispute with Iraq in 1926
are all examples to the use of international law and
diplomacy in Turkish foreign policy
Soru 45
Which one of the following foreign policy factors has been influential on Turkey's coming to the agends in terms of the migration crisis engulfing European countries?
Seçenekler
A
International System
B
Geography is the Destiny
C
Ataturk’s Legacy
D
Westernization
E
Ottoman Legacy
Açıklama:
Turkey’s geography has recently
come to the agenda in the context of the migration
crisis engulfing European countries. The migration
deal that Turkey signed with the European Union
in the spring of 2016 is very much the function
of Turkey’s peculiar geography in the context of
European efforts to stem the refugee flow emanating
from the Greater Middle Eastern region.
come to the agenda in the context of the migration
crisis engulfing European countries. The migration
deal that Turkey signed with the European Union
in the spring of 2016 is very much the function
of Turkey’s peculiar geography in the context of
European efforts to stem the refugee flow emanating
from the Greater Middle Eastern region.
Soru 46
Which one of the following is not among the structural factors of foreign policy?
Seçenekler
A
Ottoman Legacy
B
Westernization
C
Ataturk’s Legacy
D
Geography is the Destiny
E
International System
Açıklama:
International system is among the Temporal and Conjectural Factors
Soru 47
Which one of the following is not among the alternative political ideologies that stand out most in Turkish politics?
Seçenekler
A
Westernism
B
Center-of-right
C
Center-of-left
D
Turkish nationalism
E
Political Islam
Açıklama:
Despite the fact that structural factors
have to a significant extent curtailed their ability
to set the course of Turkish foreign policy in line
with their distinctive political ideology, they have
nevertheless had the opportunity to reflect their
ideologies on Turkey’s diplomatic choices. Of all
the alternative political ideologies, center-of-right,
center-of-left, Turkish nationalism and political
Islam stand out most.
have to a significant extent curtailed their ability
to set the course of Turkish foreign policy in line
with their distinctive political ideology, they have
nevertheless had the opportunity to reflect their
ideologies on Turkey’s diplomatic choices. Of all
the alternative political ideologies, center-of-right,
center-of-left, Turkish nationalism and political
Islam stand out most.
Soru 48
Which one of the following may not be considered as a soft power initiative in with regard to foreign policy?
Seçenekler
A
Transforming the Turkish Airlines into one of the largest air-carriers all over the world
B
Founding the English language TRT-World
C
Increased investment in the development of national defense-industry
D
Increasing humanitarian and development aids to poor and needy countries
E
Establishing particular state institutions in charge of dealing with the problems of Turkish-origin people in other countries
Açıklama:
Improving Turkey’s positive image in the eyes of
other countries does also constitute an important
part of Turkish diplomatic efforts in recent
years. Investing in public diplomacy initiatives,
transforming the Turkish Airlines into one of the
largest air-carriers all over the world, founding
the English language TRT-World, redesigning the
TRT as a multi-lingual broadcasting company,
increasing humanitarian and development aids
to poor and needy countries (Çelik and İşeri,
2016, 429-448), and establishing particular state
institutions in charge of dealing with the problems
of Turkish-origin people in the countries which
host sizable Turkish communities can all be
considered as important soft power initiatives
other countries does also constitute an important
part of Turkish diplomatic efforts in recent
years. Investing in public diplomacy initiatives,
transforming the Turkish Airlines into one of the
largest air-carriers all over the world, founding
the English language TRT-World, redesigning the
TRT as a multi-lingual broadcasting company,
increasing humanitarian and development aids
to poor and needy countries (Çelik and İşeri,
2016, 429-448), and establishing particular state
institutions in charge of dealing with the problems
of Turkish-origin people in the countries which
host sizable Turkish communities can all be
considered as important soft power initiatives
Soru 49
When did Turkey join to NATO?
Seçenekler
A
1950
B
1951
C
1952
D
1953
E
1954
Açıklama:
Turkey has been one of the most important
members of NATO since its accession to the
Alliance in 1952. Having defined for many years
its foreign, defense and security policies on the
basis of NATO membership, Turkey began to
adopt a more questioning and critical perspective
towards the Alliance with the end of the Cold
War
members of NATO since its accession to the
Alliance in 1952. Having defined for many years
its foreign, defense and security policies on the
basis of NATO membership, Turkey began to
adopt a more questioning and critical perspective
towards the Alliance with the end of the Cold
War
Soru 50
Which one of the following stands for the major reason why Turkey wanted to be a member of NATO after The Second World War?
Seçenekler
A
Security oriented perspective
B
Economic perspective
C
Humanitarian perspective
D
Euroasianism perspective
E
Human rights
Açıklama:
After the Second World War ended, Turkey
wanted to join NATO mainly from a security
oriented perspective. Not possessing the means
to cope with the threats stemming from the
Soviet Union on its own (for instance, Moscow’s
territorial demands on the Straits and the provinces
of Kars and Ardahan in eastern Anatolia) Turkey
wanted to secure Western help by joining the
multilateral security organization NATO.
wanted to join NATO mainly from a security
oriented perspective. Not possessing the means
to cope with the threats stemming from the
Soviet Union on its own (for instance, Moscow’s
territorial demands on the Straits and the provinces
of Kars and Ardahan in eastern Anatolia) Turkey
wanted to secure Western help by joining the
multilateral security organization NATO.
Soru 51
Which of the following is TRUE?
I.Turkey is defined as the crown jewel in geopolitical power struggles among external actors.
II.Open discussion of diplomatic and foreign policy issues before the public is generally seen as risky in Turkish diplomacy.
III.Turkey totally distanced itself away from Ottoman legacy.
IV. Joining NATO should be understood as an effort of Turkey to achieve its security interests through alliance politics.
I.Turkey is defined as the crown jewel in geopolitical power struggles among external actors.
II.Open discussion of diplomatic and foreign policy issues before the public is generally seen as risky in Turkish diplomacy.
III.Turkey totally distanced itself away from Ottoman legacy.
IV. Joining NATO should be understood as an effort of Turkey to achieve its security interests through alliance politics.
Seçenekler
A
I and II
B
II and III
C
I, II, IV
D
I, II, III
E
II, III, IV
Açıklama:
Turkish rulers tend to speak with foreigners as if today’s Turkey is the Ottoman Empire of the sixteenth century.
Soru 52
Which of the following is NOT TRUE about the westernization process of Turkey?
Seçenekler
A
Westernization is a very important structural variable of Turkish foreign policy.
B
Membership in NATO is seen vital to the fulfillment of Turkey’s national security interests
C
Particularly during the post-Cold war era, Turkey’s Westernization process is still on.
D
This process has never had negative connotations in the context of Turkish diplomatic history
E
At times of tension in Turkey’s relations with the European Union, the idea of Eurasianism tends to become popular among Turkey’s strategic elites.
Açıklama:
This process has both negative and positive connotations in the context of Turkish diplomatic history. Turks love and hate Westerners simultaneously.
Soru 53
When did Turkey join NATO?
Seçenekler
A
1947
B
1949
C
1950
D
1951
E
1952
Açıklama:
Turkey became a NATO member in 1952.
Soru 54
Which of the following is TRUE?
Seçenekler
A
Russia defined Turkey as the unsinkable aircraft carrier during the Cold War.
B
Turkey’s geographical location has always been off the table in Turkish diplomacy.
C
It tries to become an energy hub during the post-Cold War era.
D
Turkish rulers have continuously disregarded Turkey’s geographical location.
E
During the Second World War, Turkey remained neutral.
Açıklama:
The only option including correct information is C.
Soru 55
Which of the following became possible through Turkish diplomatic efforts in 1934?
Seçenekler
A
The formation of Balkan Entente
B
The Saadabad Pact
C
The foundation of NATO
D
The foundation of the United Nations
E
The end of bipolar international system
Açıklama:
The formation of Balkan Entente in 1934 and the Saadabad Pact in 1937 became possible through Turkish diplomatic efforts. Despite the fact that Turkey had just left behind its war of independence and its material power capabilities were not match of key regional and global powers, the multipolar character of the international system presented Ankara with opportunities to muddle through its way
Soru 56
Which of the below posed a threat to Turkey and caused it to try to to secure Western help by joining NATO?
Seçenekler
A
Germany
B
China
C
Japan
D
Italy
E
The Soviet Union
Açıklama:
After the Second World War ended, Turkey wanted to join NATO mainly from a security
oriented perspective. Not possessing the means to cope with the threats stemming from the Soviet Union on its own (for instance, Moscow’s territorial demands on the Straits and the provinces of Kars and Ardahan in eastern Anatolia) Turkey wanted to secure Western help by joining the multilateral security organization NATO.
oriented perspective. Not possessing the means to cope with the threats stemming from the Soviet Union on its own (for instance, Moscow’s territorial demands on the Straits and the provinces of Kars and Ardahan in eastern Anatolia) Turkey wanted to secure Western help by joining the multilateral security organization NATO.
Soru 57
Which of the following is NOT an instance in which NATO suspended its privileged position in Turkish diplomacy during much of the Cold War period?
Seçenekler
A
The anti-U.S. sentiments running high in Turkey
B
The invasion of Normandy in 1944
C
The Cuban missile crisis in 1962
D
The Johnson Letter crisis in 1964
E
The arms embargo crisis in 1975
Açıklama:
Despite the Cuban missile crisis in 1962, the Johnson Letter crisis in 1964, the arms embargo crisis in 1975, and the anti-U.S. sentiments running high in the country from time to time; NATO preserved its privileged position in Turkish diplomacy during much of the Cold War period.
Soru 58
Which of the following is TRUE regarding NATO's losing some of its appeal in Turkish diplomacy after the threat stemming from the Soviet Union disappeared?
I.The quality of Turkey’s relations with European allies have begun to be much more dependent on the pace of Turkey’s accession process with the European Union.
II. The collapse of the Soviet Union and the gradual amelioration in European security feeling helped dilute NATO’s primacy as a European security organization.
III. The Middle East, Balkans and Caucasus have started to become less important in the context of Turkey’s security.
IV.Turkey’s security began to be increasingly affected by the developments taking place in non-European geographies.
I.The quality of Turkey’s relations with European allies have begun to be much more dependent on the pace of Turkey’s accession process with the European Union.
II. The collapse of the Soviet Union and the gradual amelioration in European security feeling helped dilute NATO’s primacy as a European security organization.
III. The Middle East, Balkans and Caucasus have started to become less important in the context of Turkey’s security.
IV.Turkey’s security began to be increasingly affected by the developments taking place in non-European geographies.
Seçenekler
A
I and III
B
I, III, IV
C
I, II, IV
D
II and IV
E
III and IV
Açıklama:
While the end of Cold War reduced the threats stemming from the Soviet Union and positively affected Turkish-Russian relations, developments in the Middle East, Balkans and Caucasus have started to become more important in the context of Turkey’s security.
Soru 59
Which of the following is TRUE?
I.Turkey’s relations with Russia have dramatically improved as Turkey has gradually left the NATO-centered.
II.Turkey and Iran are supporting different constituencies in Iraq and Syria, as a reslt of which their cooperation terminated in other areas in their interests.
III.To AKP governments, Turkey should be defined as a central country, suggesting that Turkish rulers adopt a Turkey-centric worldview in defining national interests and policies.
IV.Turkey’s main objective has been to prevent the transformation process of NATO from negatively affecting its relations with its neighbors as well as the positive perception of Turkey in the Islamic world.
I.Turkey’s relations with Russia have dramatically improved as Turkey has gradually left the NATO-centered.
II.Turkey and Iran are supporting different constituencies in Iraq and Syria, as a reslt of which their cooperation terminated in other areas in their interests.
III.To AKP governments, Turkey should be defined as a central country, suggesting that Turkish rulers adopt a Turkey-centric worldview in defining national interests and policies.
IV.Turkey’s main objective has been to prevent the transformation process of NATO from negatively affecting its relations with its neighbors as well as the positive perception of Turkey in the Islamic world.
Seçenekler
A
I, II, III
B
I and III
C
II and IV
D
I, III, IV
E
II and III
Açıklama:
Turkish-Iranian rivalry in the post-American Middle East has not put the bilateral relations in jeopardy either. Turkey and Iran are supporting different constituencies in Iraq and Syria, yet they still see cooperation in other areas in their interests.
Soru 60
Which of the following is TRUE?
Seçenekler
A
Turkey thinks that Russia’s concerns should have been given more attention while developing NATO’s policies concerning enlargement and the missile defense system.
B
Turkey has abandoned a more questioning and critical stance throughout NATO’s transformation process.
C
Turkey’s contribution to Europe’s security within NATO has gradually become more and more emphasized, absent the common Soviet threat.
D
Because of the developments taking place in non-European geographies, it has become easier to build Turkey’s foreign and security policies primarily on the Western axis.
E
Had Turkey continued to follow a primarily NATO-oriented foreign and security policy, particularly prior to the so-called Arab Spring process, it would have achieved its goals.
Açıklama:
Options B, C, D and E are incorrect. The only correct option is A.
Soru 61
Which Turkish politician quite often said that the scope of Turkish diplomacy is global and Turkey should act as an order-creator country in its environment?
Seçenekler
A
Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu
B
Ahmet Davutoğlu
C
Deniz Baykal
D
Berat Albayrak
E
Ahmet Demircan
Açıklama:
The practice of defining Turkey as a responsible diplomatic actor that should contribute to the solution of regional and global humanitarian, developmental and security problems has strengthened during the reign of Justice and Development Party governments since 2002. The imperial mentality seems to have made itself appear in the foreign policy discourse of the AKP era politicians. For example, former Prime Minster Ahmet Davutoglu quite often said that the scope of Turkish diplomacy is global and Turkey should act as an order-creator country in its environment. The circles that see Turkey through imperial eyes find it difficult to understand that the Republic of Turkey constitutes a break with the Ottoman past.
Soru 62
Which of the following is NOT one of the legacies that the rulers of the Turkish republic inherited from the Ottoman past?
Seçenekler
A
The state is the main diplomatic and security actor.
B
Turkey would not be able to achieve its national interests if the gains of the wars won on battlefields were not legitimized through diplomatic negotiations.
C
Diplomatic and foreign policy issues need to be dealt with secretly and behind closed doors.
D
Turkey is the continuation of the Empire.
E
Ideologies such as pan-Turkism, pan-Ottomanism, and pan- Islamism should not be discarded.
Açıklama:
Another legacy of the Ottoman years is that the alternative ideologies and strategies that had once come to the agenda in late 19th century with a view to ensuring the survival of the Ottoman Empire - namely pan-Turkism, pan-Ottomanism and pan- Islamisim - have continued to influence Turkey’s diplomatic practices during the Republican era. Despite the fact that the founding rulers of the Turkish Republic discarded all adventurist strategies from the lexicon of state and heavily invested in Turkish nationalism, all the ‘isms’ mentioned have continued to be influential in coming decades.
Soru 63
What has the number one national security interest of Turkey been?
Seçenekler
A
To westernize the country.
B
To create an enormous economy.
C
To preserve Turkey’s gains and ensure that Turkey survives as an independent sovereign country.
D
To unite the nations with Turkish origin.
E
To sever ties with the west and create ones with the east.
Açıklama:
Since the beginning of the Republic, Turkey’s diplomatic efforts have aimed at protecting Turkey’s territorial integrity, national sovereignty and societal cohesion. The number one national security interest has been to preserve Turkey’s gains and ensure that Turkey survives as an independent sovereign country. Maximalistandirredentistclaimshavenevershaped Turkey’s republican era diplomatic initiatives. As a middle power, Turkish diplomatic and security initiatives aim at reading the external developments right and taking the most appropriate measures in responding to them.
Soru 64
What was Turkey's immediate reaction when the Soviet Union wanted to get control of the straits and eastern part of Anatolia in the immediate aftermath of the World War II?
Seçenekler
A
To seek help from the east.
B
To threaten to declare war.
C
To accept to go under the mandate of the Soviet Union
D
To seek security cooperation with the United States.
E
To join Nato to secure its borders.
Açıklama:
The United States defined Turkey as the unsinkable aircraft carrier during the Cold War. The Soviet Union wanted to get control of the straits and eastern part of Anatolia in the immediate aftermath of the World War II and this prompted Turkey to seek security cooperation with the United States. Turkey joined NATO in 1952 to deal with the Soviet challenge much better. Turkey’s efforts to become an energy hub during the post-Cold War era are noticeable. In its effort to convince the Europeans to the idea of Turkey’s membership in the European Union, Turkish rulers have continuously instrumentalized Turkey’s geographical location as a bargaining chip.
Soru 65
What was Turkey's foreign policy on managing the great powers of the world between 1923 and 1939?
Seçenekler
A
To build ties with only England
B
To build ties with only the Soviet Union
C
To build ties with only the USA
D
To keep away from all powers and develop alone.
E
To pursue a multi-directional foreign policy and build a balance depending on the situation
Açıklama:
The time period between 1923 and 1939 had a multipolar international and regional environment with none of the great powers having the ability to set the course of international developments, let alone imposing its will on to others through unilateral and coercive means. During this period, Turkey’s maneuvering capability was high and Turkey pursued a multi-directional foreign policy.
Soru 66
What constitutes the most important source of Turkish diplomacy in the international area?
Seçenekler
A
Turkey's democracy
B
Turkey’s strong military power capability
C
Turkey's hospitality
D
Turkey's respected leaders
E
Turkey's multicultural society
Açıklama:
Turkey’s strong military power capability constitutes the most important source of Turkish diplomacy. Unless buttressed by military power capability in the background, diplomatic initiatives might not yield positive results in the anarchical environment of international relations. Deployment of Turkish military units outside Turkish boundaries has in recent years improved Turkey’s ability to score diplomatic gains against its contenders.
Soru 67
When did Turkey become a member of NATO?
Seçenekler
A
1945
B
1947
C
1952
D
1958
E
1960
Açıklama:
Turkey has been one of the most important members of NATO since its accession to the Alliance in 1952. Having defined for many years its foreign, defense and security policies on the basis of NATO membership, Turkey began to adopt a more questioning and critical perspective towards the Alliance with the end of the Cold War.
Soru 68
What was the most important factor that facilitated Turkey's accession to NATO alliance?
Seçenekler
A
The United States which attributed tremendous importance to Turkey’s geopolitical position.
B
Turkey's willingness to be in a western alliance.
C
Economic benefits that would stem from Turkey's participation in NATO.
D
Trade agreements that would be possible with Turkey's participation in NATO.
E
NATO's pursuit of finding new members to the alliance.
Açıklama:
The most important factor that facilitated Turkey’s accession to the Alliance was that the United States, as being the most important NATO member, attributed tremendous importance to Turkey’s geopolitical position and military capacity in the context of Cold War’s security dynamics. The assumption on the part of the US strategists was that the task of fulfilling NATO’s containment and deterrence strategies vis-à-vis the Soviet Union would be much easier if Turkey joined the Alliance and prevented the Soviet penetration into the eastern Mediterranean and Middle Eastern regions.
Soru 69
Which of the following gives wrong information about the events after the cold war?
Seçenekler
A
Turkey’s attitude towards the Alliance has begun to change.
B
Turkey’s efforts to reach out to non-Western geographies and actors have increased.
C
Threats leveled against Turkey’s national security have changed during this process.
D
NATO’s special and privileged position in the definition of Turkey’s foreign and security policies has weakened.
E
Turkish-Russian relations tightened which resulted in precautions taken by Turkey.
Açıklama:
Threats leveled against Turkey’s national security have changed during this process. While the end of Cold War reduced the threats stemming from the Soviet Union and positively affected Turkish-Russian relations, developments in the Middle East, Balkans and Caucasus have started to become more important in the context of Turkey’s security.
Soru 70
Which option gives wrong information about the views of AKP governments about Turkey?
Seçenekler
A
Turkish foreign policy should be conducted in a single-dimensional fashion.
B
Turkey should be defined as a central country.
C
Turkish rulers adopt a Turkey-centric worldview in defining national interests and policies.
D
Turkey should be in a position to feel itself as part of each and every geographical location.
E
The main foreign policy objective of Turkey should be to help shape regional developments decisively.
Açıklama:
To AKP governments, Turkey should be defined as a central country, suggesting that Turkish rulers adopt a Turkey-centric worldview in defining national interests and policies. In addition, Turkey should be in a position to feel itself as part of each and every geographical location. The main foreign policy objective of Turkey should be to help shape regional developments decisively and to forge interests-based pragmatic relationships with key global actors. Turkish foreign policy should be defined and conducted in a multi-lateral and multi-dimensional fashion so as to make sure that regional and global developments do not negatively affect the liberal democratic transformation and economic development processes at home.
Soru 71
When did Turkey become a NATO member?
Seçenekler
A
1942
B
1949
C
1950
D
1952
E
1957
Açıklama:
Turkey has been one of the most important members of NATO since its accession to the Alliance in 1952. The correct answer is D.
Soru 72
Which of the following statements is TRUE about Turkey's approach towards NATO after the end of the Cold War?
Seçenekler
A
Turkey decided to leave NATO.
B
Turkey adopted a more questioning perspective.
C
Turkey started to be more supportive of the alliance.
D
Turkey started to see NATO as a harmful.
E
Turkey's perspective remained the same.
Açıklama:
Turkey has been one of the most important members of NATO since its accession to the Alliance in 1952. Having defined for many years its foreign, defense and security policies on the basis of NATO membership, Turkey began to adopt a more questioning and critical perspective towards the Alliance with the end of the Cold War. Although NATO continues to maintain its importance in Turkish foreign and security policy thinking, it would be wrong to suggest that this is at the same level as it was during the Cold War era. The correct answer is B.
Soru 73
I. Turkey wanted to join NATO mainly from a security oriented perspective.
II. Turkey's main expectation from NATO was economic gains.
III. NATO membership was considered as an important milestone in Turkey’s decades-old Westernization/ Europeanization/modernization process.
Which of the statements above are TRUE about Turkey's intentions to join NATO?
II. Turkey's main expectation from NATO was economic gains.
III. NATO membership was considered as an important milestone in Turkey’s decades-old Westernization/ Europeanization/modernization process.
Which of the statements above are TRUE about Turkey's intentions to join NATO?
Seçenekler
A
I.
B
II.
C
III.
D
II. and III.
E
I. and III.
Açıklama:
After the Second World War ended, Turkey wanted to join NATO mainly from a security oriented perspective. Not possessing the means to cope with the threats stemming from the Soviet Union on its own (for instance, Moscow’s territorial demands on the Straits and the provinces of Kars and Ardahan in eastern Anatolia) Turkey wanted to secure Western help by joining the multilateral security organization NATO.
Another factor that initially pushed Turkey to seek membership in NATO and later on proved to be one of the main reasons for its justification in the eyes of Turkish people was that NATO membership was considered as an important milestone in Turkey’s decades-old Westernization/ Europeanization/modernization process. Thanks to NATO membership, Turkey could argue for many years that it was a Western/European state. The. correct answer is E.
Another factor that initially pushed Turkey to seek membership in NATO and later on proved to be one of the main reasons for its justification in the eyes of Turkish people was that NATO membership was considered as an important milestone in Turkey’s decades-old Westernization/ Europeanization/modernization process. Thanks to NATO membership, Turkey could argue for many years that it was a Western/European state. The. correct answer is E.
Soru 74
Which country wanted to get control of the straits and eastern part of Anatolia in the immediate aftermath of the World War II?
Seçenekler
A
The Soviet Union
B
Germany
C
The United States
D
France
E
The United Kingdom
Açıklama:
The United States defined Turkey as the unsinkable aircraft carrier during the Cold War. The Soviet Union wanted to get control of the straits and eastern part of Anatolia in the immediate aftermath of the World War II and this prompted Turkey to seek security cooperation with the United States. The correct answer is A.
Soru 75
Which two countries launch the operation in Libya?
Seçenekler
A
Britain and Spain
B
France and Germany
C
France and Britain
D
Spain and Italy
E
Germany and Italy
Açıklama:
Turkey initially opposed to NATO’s intervention in Libya. This operation was at the beginning launched by Britain and France outside NATO framework and then taken over by the Alliance. Turkey was extremely sensitive on the possibility of this NATO operation causing severe human losses in Libya and negatively affecting Turkey’s image across the Islamic world. The correct answer is C.
Soru 76
US-led Western international community was against which country during the Cold War era?
Seçenekler
A
The Soviet Union
B
Iran
C
Greece
D
The United Kindom
E
Germany
Açıklama:
US-led Western international community against the Soviet Union during the Cold War era. The correct answer is A.
Soru 77
When did Hatay become a part of Turkey?
Seçenekler
A
1936
B
1937
C
1938
D
1939
E
1940
Açıklama:
The revision of the Lasuanne regulations on the status of Turkish Straits through the Montreaux Convention in 1936, the incorporation of Hatay region into Turkey in 1939, and the settlement of the Mousul question and the border dispute with Iraq in 1926 are all examples to the use of international law and diplomacy in Turkish foreign policy. The correct answer is D.
Soru 78
When was the Mousul question and the border dispute with Iraq settled?
Seçenekler
A
1922
B
1923
C
1924
D
1925
E
1926
Açıklama:
The revision of the Lasuanne regulations on the status of Turkish Straits through the Montreaux Convention in 1936, the incorporation of Hatay region into Turkey in 1939, and the settlement of the Mousul question and the border dispute with Iraq in 1926 are all examples to the use of international law and diplomacy in Turkish foreign policy. Diplomacy backed by hard power capability and diplomatic initiatives conferring legitimacy on military victories constitute the backbone of Ataturk’s diplomatic legacy. The correct answer is E.
Soru 79
Which of the following statements is in FALSE about Libya Operation?
Seçenekler
A
Turkey initially opposed to NATO’s intervention in Libya.
B
This operation was at the beginning launched by NATO.
C
Turkey was sensitive on the possibility of this NATO operation causing severe human losses.
D
Turkey played an important role in setting the limits and operational mandate of the operation to be carried out.
E
Turkey was highly sensitive that ground troops were avoided from being used during the operation.
Açıklama:
Turkey initially opposed to NATO’s intervention in Libya. This operation was at the beginning launched by Britain and France outside NATO framework and then taken over by the Alliance. Turkey was extremely sensitive on the possibility of this NATO operation causing severe human losses in Libya and negatively affecting Turkey’s image across the Islamic world. However, once the allies sorted out their disagreements and decided that NATO should take over the operational responsibility, Turkey became a part of this consensus. However, Turkey played an important role in setting the limits and operational mandate of the operation to be carried out in Libya. Turkey was highly sensitive that ground troops not be used during the operation and the primary mission to be controlling the embargo imposed on Gaddafi forces from the sea and air. The correct answer is B.
Soru 80
Turkey increased its efforts to ensure that NATO’s new security document adopted in Lisbon in November 2010 does not mention which country as a threat?
Seçenekler
A
Afghanistan
B
Libya
C
Iran
D
Iraq
E
Syria
Açıklama:
Moreover, Turkey has evaluated NATO‘s missile defense shield system in the context of its relations with Iran. The assumption held by the security circles in Turkey was that in case some parts of this system were installed in Turkish territories, Iran might have considered it as a threat against itself and adopted a more hostile attitude towards Turkey. This very much explains why Turkey increased its efforts to ensure that NATO’s new security document adopted in Lisbon in November 2010 does not mention Iran as a threat and emphasize that the radar component of the system to be deployed in Turkey is for purely defensive purposes. The correct answer is C.
Soru 81
What recent developments have influenced the role of civil society in Turkish diplomacy?
Seçenekler
A
Economic reforms
B
Military interventions
C
Cultural exchanges
D
Technological advancements
E
Europeanization and democratization
Açıklama:
Diplomacy has always been the privilege of state elites in Türkiye. It is during the process of Europeanization and democratization that civil society has finally begun to acquire an important role in Turkish diplomacy. It is now the case that both elected politicians are more knowledgeable than before about foreign policy and diplomatic issues and think tanks have mushroomed as institutional platforms offering expert-help to decision makers.
Soru 82
Under what strategy does Türkiye seek safety and recognition by aligning itself with the West/Europe?
Seçenekler
A
Easternization
B
Neutralization
C
Globalization
D
Westernization
E
Isolationism
Açıklama:
Westernization is also thought of a security strategy in that Turkey would feel itself safe and secure if it came closer to the West/Europe and its Western/European identity were recognized as such
by Westerners/Europeans (Oğuzlu, 2003, 285-299). Given that the Ottoman Empire came to an end at the hands of the Western European nations, the founding fathers of the Republic assumed that
Turkey’s security would improve, if Europeans saw Turkey as a member of the Western/European family of nations.
by Westerners/Europeans (Oğuzlu, 2003, 285-299). Given that the Ottoman Empire came to an end at the hands of the Western European nations, the founding fathers of the Republic assumed that
Turkey’s security would improve, if Europeans saw Turkey as a member of the Western/European family of nations.
Soru 83
Which ideologies from the late 19th century still have an impact on Turkiye's diplomatic practices?
Seçenekler
A
Pan-Turkism, pan-Ottomanism, pan-Islamism
B
Nationalism, liberalism, conservatism
C
Secularism, democracy, pluralism
D
Capitalism, socialism, communism
E
Fascism, authoritarianism, militarism
Açıklama:
Another legacy of the Ottoman years is that the alternative ideologies and strategies that had once come to the agenda in late 19th century with a view to ensuring the survival of the Ottoman Empire - namely pan-Turkism, pan-Ottomanism and pan Islamisim - have continued to influence Turkey’s diplomatic practices during the Republican era. Despite the fact that the founding rulers of the Turkish Republic discarded all adventurist strategies from the lexicon of state and heavily invested in Turkish nationalism, all the ‘isms’ mentioned have continued to be influential in coming decades.
Ünite 7
Soru 1
Which of the following is NOT about the factors affecting the foreign policy behaviors?
Seçenekler
A
Material power capabilities
B
Geographical locations
C
External developments
D
Belief systems
E
Personal priorities
Açıklama:
Whereas one group of scholars argues that foreign policy behaviors are mainly a function of intangible factors of material power capabilities, geographical locations, and external developments, another group contends that intangible factors of personality traits, belief systems, world views, ideologies and cultures play more decisive roles.
Soru 2
Which of the following is TRUE about many middle and small-sized powers?
Seçenekler
A
They are more preoccupied with their survival.
B
Their room of maneuvering is flexible.
C
Their main focus is to invest in their own material capabilities.
D
They primarily aim to stay away from global powers.
E
They do anything to pursue their value-oriented normative foreign policies.
Açıklama:
Many middle and small-sized powers are much more preoccupied with their survival. Compared to global powers, their room of maneuvering is limited. Their success in ensuring survival hinges on their ability to play global powers off against each other, viz. external balancing, rather than solely investing in their own material capabilities, viz. internal balancing. Their foreign policy behaviors aim primarily at mitigating the negative consequences of global power competitions on their internal stability and external sovereignty. Compared to global powers, middle and small-sized powers find it difficult to pursue value-oriented normative foreign policies mainly because their material power capabilities are limited.
Soru 3
* Making use of the existing power balances to maximize their power capabilities
* Changing a particular external environment to their liking
Which of the following power(s) can aim and is able to do the above mentioned targets?
* Changing a particular external environment to their liking
Which of the following power(s) can aim and is able to do the above mentioned targets?
Seçenekler
A
Middle powers
B
Smallsized powers
C
Global powers
D
Middle and smallsized powers
E
Global and small sized powers
Açıklama:
Unlike some middle powers and many smallsized powers, global powers have the luxury of helping bring into existence a particular external environment to their liking, as well as making use of the existing power balances within the system to maximize their material power capabilities. Stated somewhat differently, global powers do not only aim at maximizing their power capabilities at the expense of their rivals but also endeavor to midwife a particular external environment that reflects their values and norms.
Soru 4
Which of the following paved the way for strengthening American primacy across the globe?
Seçenekler
A
The start of Cold War era
B
The election of Donald Trump
C
The election of Barack Obama
D
The end of Cold War era
E
9/11 Terrorist Attack
Açıklama:
The end of the Cold War era paved the way for strengthening American primacy across the globe, as no other power was in a position to shake up the foundations of this uni-polar era for about fifteen years. The 1990s and much of the 2000s demonstrated that the U.S. was the indispensable power on earth.
Soru 5
Which of the following states a similarity between Obama and Trump in terms of their foreign policy strategy?
Seçenekler
A
They were both multilateralist.
B
They were both unilateralist.
C
They both accepted nation-building exercised in foreign countries.
D
They both preferred a liberal approach in foreign policy.
E
They both adopted a more pragmatic foreign policy approach.
Açıklama:
The election of Barack Obama to presidency in late 2008 can be read not only as the demonstration of the frustration of the American electorate with the policies of the Bush administration but also the growing need to adjust to the emerging dynamics of the post-American world order. Despite Donald Trump’s strong criticisms of Obama administrations’ foreign policy practices, the former appears to continue with the basic foreign policy strategy of the latter with some nuances. Both rejected nation-building exercises in foreign countries and adopted a more realist and pragmatic foreign policy approach than a liberal one. However, whereas Obama was of more ‘multilateralist’, Trump seems to be more ‘bilateralist’ and ‘unilateralist’.
Soru 6
European allies should spend more on their security and defense.
European allies should speed up their integration process within EU.
European allies should contribute more strategic and military capabilities to NATO.
Relying on the above-mentioned information, the U.S government implies that _____ .
European allies should speed up their integration process within EU.
European allies should contribute more strategic and military capabilities to NATO.
Relying on the above-mentioned information, the U.S government implies that _____ .
Seçenekler
A
they want to channel its attention to these countries
B
they do not want to play the role of benign hegemon any longer
C
the problems are growing in number in Europe
D
NATO and EU are two important organizations in Europe
E
middlepower countries may turn into global powers
Açıklama:
Both Obama and Trump recognized that the U.S. should no longer play the role of global hegemon in maintaining peace and security. Contrary to the ‘hegemonic stability theory’, the US does not want to play the role of benign hegemon any longer. As for the relations with traditional allies, the key message the United States is now sending is that those allies should spend more on their security and defense. They should not take the American commitment to their security for granted. European allies should both speed up their integration process within EU and contribute more strategic and military capabilities to NATO (Haas, 2017, 2-9). Dealing with the challenges arising from the resurgent Russia, instability in the Balkans and the growing anarchy in the Middle East and North Africa is first and foremost the responsibility of European allies. What happens in these locations affect Europe more than the U.S. It is now abundantly clear that that the U.S. does not want to channel too much of its attention and capabilities to European and Middle Eastern security challenges. Rather, it would like to see its European allies pay much of the bill in such theatres. With Obama and Trump, the focus on great power relations came back. Dealing with China and Russia now appears to be more important than focusing on humanitarian interventions, counter-terrorism and democracy promotion exercises.
Soru 7
Which of the following is FALSE about the economic crisis in 2008?
Seçenekler
A
It weakened the specter of the EU to become a global power.
B
It made it clear that the United States is today the most indebted country on earth.
C
It showed that Russia was the number one creditor country.
D
China started to be on the rise as the aspiring hegemon.
E
The United States started to lose its power.
Açıklama:
The financial crisis that hit western economies in 2008 severely seems to have turned all such western assumptions upside down. The economic crisis in 2008 has not only weakened the specter of the EU to become a global power, both in economic and normative senses, but also made it abundantly clear that the success of the American economic model has been to a significant extent tied to the interdependent economic relations developed with the non-western world, most notably China. The crisis and its aftermath have made it unavoidably clear that the United States is today the most indebted country on earth whereas China the number one creditor country. Besides, majorities across the globe seem to believe that China, the aspiring hegemon, is on the rise whereas the United States, the incumbent hegemon, in terminal decline.
Soru 8
Which of the following establishments susggests that Russia is offering an alternative world order to the one shaped by western powers?
Seçenekler
A
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development
Active Russian agency in the establishment of the Eurasian Economic Union, the Shanghai Cooperation Organization and BRICSs should be read as Russia’s growing determination to offer an alternative world order to the one shaped by western powers. In Russian strategic thinking, the road to global primacy passes through the entrenchment of Russia’s geopolitical influence in Europe and Eurasia. It is where Russia finds itself in strategic competition with the West.
Active Russian agency in the establishment of the Eurasian Economic Union, the Shanghai Cooperation Organization and BRICSs should be read as Russia’s growing determination to offer an alternative world order to the one shaped by western powers. In Russian strategic thinking, the road to global primacy passes through the entrenchment of Russia’s geopolitical influence in Europe and Eurasia. It is where Russia finds itself in strategic competition with the West.
B
Eurasian Economic Union
C
International Labor Organization
D
International Monetary Fund
E
European Central Bank
Açıklama:
Active Russian agency in the establishment of the Eurasian Economic Union, the Shanghai Cooperation Organization and BRICSs should be read as Russia’s growing determination to offer an alternative world order to the one shaped by western powers. In Russian strategic thinking, the road to global primacy passes through the entrenchment of Russia’s geopolitical influence in Europe and Eurasia. It is where Russia finds itself in strategic competition with the West.
Soru 9
Which of the following is FALSE about Russia?
Seçenekler
A
Russian security elites put a lot of stress on Russia’s territorial integrity.
B
In Russia, many economic activities are closely regulated and monitored by the state.
C
Russian economy relies highly on the export of commodities in a semi-close economy.
D
In Russia, the state is extremely involved in economics, social and political life like China.
E
Russia is a multi-lingual, multi-ethic and multicultural state, which puts national sovereignty above other concerns.
Açıklama:
Russia is a multi-lingual, multi-ethic and multicultural state and this pushes Russian security elites to put an overwhelming stress on Russia’s territorial integrity and national sovereignty over all other concerns.
Russia’s objections to the primacy of the liberal western order also emanate from its peculiar political and cultural values. Unlike the developed western economies which are built on the capitalist values, Russian economy very much relies on the export of commodities in a semi-close economy, such as gas and oil. Unlike the Chinese model in which capitalist modernization process could go hand in hand with authoritarian state policies, Russia offers a particular example of illiberal societies in which the state is extremely involved in economics, social and political life.
Russia’s objections to the primacy of the liberal western order also emanate from its peculiar political and cultural values. Unlike the developed western economies which are built on the capitalist values, Russian economy very much relies on the export of commodities in a semi-close economy, such as gas and oil. Unlike the Chinese model in which capitalist modernization process could go hand in hand with authoritarian state policies, Russia offers a particular example of illiberal societies in which the state is extremely involved in economics, social and political life.
Soru 10
According to Eurasianism, Russia __________ .
Which of the following best completes the sentence above?
Which of the following best completes the sentence above?
Seçenekler
A
is both a European and Asian country at the same time
B
has to compromise with the global hegemon, the U.S.
C
could give little help to European communities
D
should lessen his power over the Eurasion region
E
can only survive with the support or European allies
Açıklama:
According to Eurasianism, Russia is both a European and Asian country at the same time and Russia’s historical mission is to unite the diverse communities in the Eurasian region under Russia’s moral and political leadership. Russia is the geopolitical hegemon of the Eurasian region and without strong Russian leadership neither Russia nor other Eurasian communities would be in a position to restrain western and eastern encroachments. Given Russia’s foreign and security polices over the last decade, one could confidently argue that Eurasianism has now become the dominant school of thought in Russia.
Soru 11
If states are mainly motivated in their external relations by the concern of maximizing their material power capabilities as well as ensuring their long-term survival, which of the following dominate their foreign policy choices?
Seçenekler
A
Interests
B
Values
C
Ideas
D
Norms
E
Internal characteristics
Açıklama:
If states are mainly motivated in their external relations by the concern of maximizing their material power capabilities as well as ensuring their long-term survival, interests dominate their foreign policy choices.
Soru 12
The end of the Cold War era paved the way for strengthening ... primacy across the globe, as no other power was in a position to shake up the foundations of this unipolar era for about fifteen years.
Which of the following options correctly completes the sentence above?
Which of the following options correctly completes the sentence above?
Seçenekler
A
British
B
American
C
Russian
D
French
E
German
Açıklama:
The end of the Cold War era paved the way for strengthening American primacy across the globe, as no other power was in a position to shake up the foundations of this unipolar era for about fifteen years.
Soru 13
Which of the following international organizations did not embody the American principles and preferences?
Seçenekler
A
The United Nations
B
The World Bank
C
The Warsaw Pact
D
The World Bank
E
The NATO
Açıklama:
The key international organizations, such as the United Nations, International Monetary Fund, World Bank and NATO all embody the American principles and preferences. However, the Warsaw Pact was established by the Soviet Union.
Soru 14
Which of the following is by far the most successful example of international institutions aiming at transcending traditional/modern interstate relations through the formation of collective identities and supranational institutions?
Seçenekler
A
The UN
B
The NATO
C
The IMF
D
The EU
E
The World Bank
Açıklama:
The EU is by far the most successful example of international institutions aiming at transcending traditional/modern interstate relations through the formation of collective identities and supranational institutions.
Soru 15
Which of the following is in charge of the European External Action Service that can be considered as the ministry of foreign affairs of the European Union?
Seçenekler
A
The President of the European Council
B
The Head of the European Commission
C
Member states
D
European Parliament
E
The EU High Representative for security and foreign policy
Açıklama:
The EU High Representative for security and foreign policy is in charge of the European External Action Service that can be considered as the ministry of foreign affairs of the European Union.
Soru 16
Which of the following is the strategy that Chinese rulers have been pursuing in their neighborhood since the late 1970s?
Seçenekler
A
Peaceful development
B
Strategy of engagement
C
Strategy of containment
D
Sustainable development
E
Peaceful coexistence
Açıklama:
Peaceful rise/peaceful development is the strategy that Chinese rulers have been pursuing in their neighborhood since the late 1970s.
Soru 17
Which of the following is an alternative institutional platform whose establishment is masterminded by China under its guidance?
Seçenekler
A
The Asia Infrastructure and Investment Bank
B
The World Bank
C
The World Trade Organization
D
The International Monetary Fund
E
The NATO
Açıklama:
The Asia Infrastructure and Investment Bank is an alternative institutional platform whose establishment is masterminded by China under its guidance?
Soru 18
Which of the following can be read as Russia’s growing determination to offer an alternative world order to the one shaped by western powers?
Seçenekler
A
The Eurasian Economic Union
B
The European Union
C
The NATO
D
The World Bank
E
The International Monetary Fund
Açıklama:
Active Russian agency in the establishment of the Eurasian Economic Union, the Shanghai Cooperation Organization and BRICSs should be read as Russia’s growing determination to offer an alternative world order to the one shaped by western powers.
Soru 19
The notion of ... occupies an important place in the Russian geopolitical thinking.
Which options correctly completes the sentence above?
Which options correctly completes the sentence above?
Seçenekler
A
Balance of power
B
Peaceful rise
C
Sphere of influence
D
Peaceful coexistence
E
Expansioanism
Açıklama:
The notion of sphere of influence occupies an important place in the Russian geopolitical thinking.
Soru 20
Which of the following approaches can be interpreted as a scholarly attempt at successfully merging the tangible and intangible motivations of states’ foreign policy behaviors?
Seçenekler
A
Neo-classical realist approach
B
Feminist approach
C
Constructivist approach
D
Marxist approach
E
Idealist approach
Açıklama:
Neo-classical realist approach can be interpreted as a scholarly attempt at successfully merging the tangible and intangible motivations of states’ foreign policy behaviors.
Soru 21
Which of the following is an issue for interests dominate foreign policy choices?
Seçenekler
A
how much benefit one could extract from others
B
state leaders bother to ask how others are ruled
C
state leaders bother to ask which values they embrace
D
the question of ‘who states are’ significantly shapes the questions of ‘what states want
E
the question of ‘who states are’ significantly shapes how states behave
Açıklama:
This discussion can also be boiled down to the debate whether foreign policy is a function of interests or values (Oguzlu, 2013, 39-51). In case interests dominate foreign policy choices and behaviors of actors, states are mainly motivated in their external relations by the concern of maximizing their material power capabilities as well as ensuring their long-term survival. Here, neither internal characteristics at home nor the way how other states are ruled in their domestic affairs has a role in shaping foreign policy. Engaging others and responding to external stimuli is basically a function of the instrumental calculation of how much benefit one could extract from such exercises.
Soru 22
Which of the following is an issue for values norms foreign policy choices?
Seçenekler
A
States are mainly motivated in their external relations
B
State leaders bothers to ask which values they embrace domestically
C
States maximize their material power capabilities
D
States ensure their long-term survival
E
Domestic affairs has a role in shaping foreign policy
Açıklama:
On the other hand, in case values and norms shape foreign policy, the question of ‘who states are’ significantly shapes the questions of ‘what states want and how states behave. Looking at foreign policy from this perspective, state leaders bother to ask how others are ruled in their internal affairs and which values they embrace domestically. Foreign policy mainly targets the internal transformation of other states in the image of the values and norms that one holds at home.
Soru 23
Which of the following is an issue for a group of scholars who combines the insights of interests and value and norms foreign policy choices in the real world?
Seçenekler
A
State leaders bother to ask how others are ruled
B
State leaders bother to ask which values they embrace
C
They claim singling out one set of variables at the negligence of others will not bring us anywhere
D
States are mainly motivated in their external relations
E
States maximize their material power capabilities
Açıklama:
A third group of scholars combines the insights of these two approaches and claims that singling out one set of variables at the negligence of others will not bring us anywhere close to understanding the complexity of the real world. They suggest that scholars had better adopt a more holistic approach in this process. The so-called neo-classical realist approach in International Relations can for example be interpreted as a scholarly attempt at successfully merging the tangible and intangible motivations of states’ foreign policy behaviors (Lobell, Ripsman and Taliaferro, 2009). Put simply, neoclassical realism posits that making sense of the tangible factors out there is made through the intangible factors that constitute states’ identities and values.
Soru 24
Which of the following is a true statement for middle and small-sized powers?
Seçenekler
A
Their room of maneuvering is unlimited
B
Their success in ensuring survival hinges on internal balancing
C
Their success in ensuring survival hinges on investing in their own material capabilities
D
They are more preoccupied with their survival
E
Their material power capabilities are unlimited
Açıklama:
Many middle and small-sized powers are much more preoccupied with their survival. Compared to global powers, their room of maneuvering is limited. Their success in ensuring survival hinges on their ability to play global powers off against each other, viz. external balancing, rather than solely investing in their own material capabilities, viz. internal balancing (Goodby, 2014, 31-39). Their foreign policy behaviors aim primarily at mitigating the negative consequences of global power competitions on their internal stability and external sovereignty. Compared to global powers, middle and small-sized powers find it difficult to pursue value-oriented normative foreign policies mainly because their material power capabilities are limited.
Soru 25
When global powers and small-sized powers to ground their foreign policies on the basis of both tangible interests and intangible values are considered, which of the following is a true statement?
Seçenekler
A
They merely responding to external stimuli in a reactionary manner
B
Global powers do feel secure in terms of their territorial integrity
C
They find it hard to immense material power capabilities to value-oriented policies abroad
D
Global powers do not aim at maximizing their power capabilities at the expense of their rivals
E
The material power capabilities empower them in their attempts at shaping the external milieu
Açıklama:
On the other hand, global powers are in a much better position than middle and small-sized powers to ground their foreign policies on the basis of both tangible interests and intangible values. The immense material power capabilities at their disposal empower them in their attempts at shaping the external milieu, rather than merely responding to external stimuli in a reactionary manner. That is also to say that adopting a soft-power oriented foreign policy approach is likely to be the prerogative of strong global powers. Investing in value projection abroad and relying on ‘power of attraction’ in dealing with others indirectly require a good deal of hard power capability. Global powers do not only feel secure in terms of their territorial integrity but also find it easy to parley their immense material power capabilities to value-oriented transformative policies abroad.
Unlike some middle powers and many small-sized powers, global powers have the luxury of helping bring into existence a particular external environment to their liking, as well as making use of the existing power balances within the system to maximize their material power capabilities. Stated somewhat differently, global powers do not only aim at maximizing their power capabilities at the expense of their rivals but also endeavor to midwife a particular external environment that reflects their values and norms (Mearsheimer, 2003).
Unlike some middle powers and many small-sized powers, global powers have the luxury of helping bring into existence a particular external environment to their liking, as well as making use of the existing power balances within the system to maximize their material power capabilities. Stated somewhat differently, global powers do not only aim at maximizing their power capabilities at the expense of their rivals but also endeavor to midwife a particular external environment that reflects their values and norms (Mearsheimer, 2003).
Soru 26
At its foundation, which of the following is not a characteristics of American society that proves the U.S. to be different from traditional powers in Europe and other continents?
Seçenekler
A
They build their country on the basis of authoritarian norms
B
They build their country on the basis of liberal norms
C
They build their country on the basis of democratic norms
D
They build their country on the basis of pluralist norms
E
They enshrine the principles of individual freedom
Açıklama:
The immigrant nature of the American society led the founders of the republic to build their country on the basis of liberal, democratic and pluralist norms, further enshrining the principles of individual freedom, free entrepreneur-ship, limited government and checks and balances in the Constitution.
Soru 27
In terms of material power capabilities and the ability to help shape the world in its own image, which of the following could be considered the major event for the U.S. to become the most powerful global actor ever seen?
Seçenekler
A
WW1
B
WW2
C
Cold War Era
D
Foundation of NATO
E
Foundation of European Union
Açıklama:
By the time the WW2 came to the end, the U.S. had already become the most powerful global actor ever seen in terms of material power capabilities and the ability to help shape the world in its own image.
Soru 28
From which does EU foreign policy take its legitimacy?
Seçenekler
A
from the common ‘I’ feeling among members
B
from the common ‘you’ feeling among members
C
from the common ‘we’ feeling among members
D
from the common ’they feeling among members
E
from the common ‘us’ feeling among members
Açıklama:
Rather than subscribing to the modern understanding of forging international relations on the basis of clear-cut inside-outside distinctions, the success of the EU emanates from its ability to have brought into existence a new understanding thereby its foreign policy takes it legitimacy from the common ‘we’ feeling among members. While the intensity and depth of this feeling is much higher among member states, external actors also feel themselves identified with the EU to different degrees.
Soru 29
Which of the following is true when the U.S. and China is contrasted?
Seçenekler
A
China is today the most indebted country on earth
B
China, the aspiring hegemon, is in decline
C
The United States, the incumbent hegemon, is on the rise
D
The United States is today the most indebted country on earth
E
The United States is the number one creditor country
Açıklama:
The financial crisis that hit western economies in 2008 severely seems to have turned all such western assumptions upside down. The economic crisis in 2008 has not only weakened the specter of the EU to become a global power, both in economic and normative senses, but also made it abundantly clear that the success of the American economic model has been to a significant extent tied to the interdependent economic relations developed with the non-western world, most notably China. The crisis and its aftermath have made it unavoidably clear that the United States is today the most indebted country on earth whereas China the number one creditor country. Besides, majorities across the globe seem to believe that China, the aspiring hegemon, is on the rise whereas the United States, the incumbent hegemon, in terminal decline.
Whereas China deems its phenomenal rise as part of its normalization process, the United States finds in China a strong contender for its global hegemony. While Chinese see their country’s efforts to leave behind the ‘centuries of humiliation’ for good as China’s rightful return to its glorious days, the majority of westerners tend to feel skeptical about the end results of this process. To many Chinese, China had been the cradle of global politics for ages by the time the western European nations eclipsed China in terms of economic output, technological innovations and military capabilities. By the middle of the 19th century, nearly half of global economic production had originated from China. Therefore, the Chinese believe that their country’s rise in recent decades should not be interpreted as the success story of an ordinary country climbing up the ladder of power. Instead, Chinese share the view that China’s recent successes are manifestations of China’s normalization and returning to world history as a major power (Xiang, 2016, 53-62).
Whereas China deems its phenomenal rise as part of its normalization process, the United States finds in China a strong contender for its global hegemony. While Chinese see their country’s efforts to leave behind the ‘centuries of humiliation’ for good as China’s rightful return to its glorious days, the majority of westerners tend to feel skeptical about the end results of this process. To many Chinese, China had been the cradle of global politics for ages by the time the western European nations eclipsed China in terms of economic output, technological innovations and military capabilities. By the middle of the 19th century, nearly half of global economic production had originated from China. Therefore, the Chinese believe that their country’s rise in recent decades should not be interpreted as the success story of an ordinary country climbing up the ladder of power. Instead, Chinese share the view that China’s recent successes are manifestations of China’s normalization and returning to world history as a major power (Xiang, 2016, 53-62).
Soru 30
Which of the following is not a criticism directed to Russia by western circles?
Seçenekler
A
its annexation of Crimea into its territory
B
its military involvement in Syria on the side of Assad regime
C
its pursuing neo-imperial policies in its near-abroad
D
its use of brute military force
E
its being on the side of Syrian democratic forces
Açıklama:
Since President Putin came to power in late 1990s, Russia has witnessed a national revival. Having an imperial legacy in the background and acting as one of the two superpowers of the Cold War era, it is quite natural and understandable that Russia wants to leave the troubled years of the 1990s behind and put a serious claim to global power status in the emerging century. Recently, Russia has come under international limelight once again following its annexation of Crimea into its territory, the support that it gives to the separatist groups in the eastern part of Ukraine and its military involvement in Syria on the side of Assad regime. Hardly a day passes without Russia being criticized by western circles of pursuing aggressive, assertive and neo-imperial policies in its near-abroad. The major criticism directed to Russia is that unlike the post-modern powers of the European Union and the liberal power the United States, Russia acts as a typical realpolitik power which deeply believes in the primacy of material power capabilities, the use of brute military force and commanding spheres of influence in global power politics. Russia is believed to have been acting as a nineteenth century power in the twenty-first century.
Soru 31
Which below cannot be said to have a direct influence on the foreign policy of states?
Seçenekler
A
Geographical location
B
Religion
C
External developments
D
Internal affairs
E
Cultures
Açıklama:
Analyzing foreign policy behaviors of states requires an in-depth examination of the motivations that influence state leaders in their external actions (Smith, Hadfield and Dunne, 2012).
Whereas one group of scholars argues that foreign policy behaviors are mainly a function of intangible factors of material power capabilities, geographical locations, and external developments, another group contends that intangible factors of personality traits, belief systems, world views, ideologies and cultures play more decisive roles (Neack, 2014).
Whereas one group of scholars argues that foreign policy behaviors are mainly a function of intangible factors of material power capabilities, geographical locations, and external developments, another group contends that intangible factors of personality traits, belief systems, world views, ideologies and cultures play more decisive roles (Neack, 2014).
Soru 32
Which below can be the main reason for middle and small-sized powers to find it difficult to pursue value-orientated normative foreign policies?
Seçenekler
A
They are more focused on their own problems.
B
They have less able leaders.
C
Their material power capabilities are limited.
D
Their cultural structures are more diverse.
E
They are suppressed by super powers.
Açıklama:
Their foreign policy behaviors aim primarily at mitigating the negative consequences of global power competitions on their internal stability and external sovereignty.
Compared to global powers, middle and small-sized powers find it difficult to pursue value-oriented normative foreign policies mainly because their material power capabilities are limited.
Compared to global powers, middle and small-sized powers find it difficult to pursue value-oriented normative foreign policies mainly because their material power capabilities are limited.
Soru 33
Global powers do not only aim at maximizing their power capabilities at the expense of their rivals but also endeavor to midwife a particular external environment that reflects their values and norms. Which of the below cannot be considered to be a global power?
Seçenekler
A
Russia
B
The United States
C
England
D
China
E
Iran
Açıklama:
Unlike some middle powers and many small-sized powers, global powers have the luxury of helping bring into existence a particular external environment to their liking, as well as making use of the existing power balances within the system to maximize their material power capabilities.
Understanding the diplomatic practices of such global powers as the United States (U.S.), European Union (EU), Russia and China help us better comprehend the dynamics of international politics and the future direction of global order.
Understanding the diplomatic practices of such global powers as the United States (U.S.), European Union (EU), Russia and China help us better comprehend the dynamics of international politics and the future direction of global order.
Soru 34
Which of the below can be seen as an indispensable tool for the United States in its diplomatic practices in the Middle-East?
Seçenekler
A
Its cultural dominance
B
The promotion of democracy
C
The power of U.S. currency
D
Its material power
E
Neo-liberal world order
Açıklama:
The U.S. is also motivated by the materialist/interest-related logic of furthering regional stability in its diplomatic practices in the Middle-East.
Making sense of foreign policy and diplomatic practices of the U.S. in the Middle East cannot be properly accomplished without taking into account the ideational/value-oriented logic of democracy promotion.
Making sense of foreign policy and diplomatic practices of the U.S. in the Middle East cannot be properly accomplished without taking into account the ideational/value-oriented logic of democracy promotion.
Soru 35
Which of the below cannot be said to be a goal of Russian diplomatic activities in Eastern Europe, wider Black Sea and wider Middle Eastern regions?
Seçenekler
A
To defend sovereign democracy
B
To ensure inviolability of territorial borders
C
To prevent interference in internal affairs of other states
D
To demonstrate great power primacy
E
To establish Pax-Sinica
Açıklama:
Many Russian diplomatic activities target both maximizing Russia’s sphere of influence in such locations and convincing other actors that the values of ‘sovereign democracy’, ‘inviolability of territorial borders’, ‘non-interference in internal affairs of other states’ and ‘great power primacy’ are seen legitimate.
Pax-Sinica can be said to be a goal China pursues.
Pax-Sinica can be said to be a goal China pursues.
Soru 36
What enabled the early generations in the United States to focus more on economic development and political cohesion at home?
Seçenekler
A
Geographical location
B
Religion
C
Cultural values
D
Lack of material power
E
Lack of political power
Açıklama:
In the realm of diplomacy and foreign policy, the rulers of the country long shunned the practices of getting involved in other states’ internal affairs and becoming part of geo-political competitions in other continents.
The geographical location of the country, being walled from other places through two oceans to the east and west, enabled the early generations to focus their attention solely on economic development and political cohesion at home.
The geographical location of the country, being walled from other places through two oceans to the east and west, enabled the early generations to focus their attention solely on economic development and political cohesion at home.
Soru 37
What does the U.S.A place at the center of its foreign and security policy engagements across the globe?
Seçenekler
A
Christian practices
B
Humanist views
C
Interventionist attitudes
D
Liberal democratic norms
E
Capitalist financial system
Açıklama:
Realist and pragmatic tendencies in American foreign policy have almost always been in sync with the liberal democratic nature of U.S. polity at home.
Since the early years of the Cold War era, the U.S. has mainly adopted an ‘internationalist’ mentality and acted as a liberal power putting its liberal democratic norms at the center of its foreign and security policy engagements across the globe (Johnstone, 2011, 13-17).
Since the early years of the Cold War era, the U.S. has mainly adopted an ‘internationalist’ mentality and acted as a liberal power putting its liberal democratic norms at the center of its foreign and security policy engagements across the globe (Johnstone, 2011, 13-17).
Soru 38
Why did the U.S play a facilitative role in the foundation of the European Union?
Seçenekler
A
To promote democracy in Europe
B
To prove to be a friend to Europe
C
To prevent communism from spreading through Europe
D
To be closer to Middle-East
E
To promote peace in Europe
Açıklama:
In addition to the multilateral NATO in Europe, the U.S. also masterminded the so-called ‘hub and spokes’ alliance structure in the Asia- Pacific theater, through which forming bilateral strategic alliances with the liberal democratic states in this region became possible.
The assumption was that economic, social and political integration among western European liberal democratic states would not only bring into existence a strong market for American goods and capital but also help the U.S. contain the existential threat emanating from the Soviet Union more cost-effectively.
The assumption was that economic, social and political integration among western European liberal democratic states would not only bring into existence a strong market for American goods and capital but also help the U.S. contain the existential threat emanating from the Soviet Union more cost-effectively.
Soru 39
What can be said to be the source of legitimacy of E.U. foreign policy?
Seçenekler
A
The economic power of the Union
B
All members' acting as one
C
The ideals that underlie its foundation
D
Its cultural influence on non-member states
E
Its geopolitical importance
Açıklama:
While the intensity and depth of this feeling is much higher among member states, external actors also feel themselves identified with the EU to different degrees.
The success of the EU emanates from its ability to have brought into existence a new understanding thereby its foreign policy takes it legitimacy from the common ‘we’ feeling among members.
The success of the EU emanates from its ability to have brought into existence a new understanding thereby its foreign policy takes it legitimacy from the common ‘we’ feeling among members.
Soru 40
Which of the below cannot said about China?
Seçenekler
A
China’s foreign policy is made by the Chinese Communist Party organs.
B
All state bureaucracy dealing with foreign policy is structured in a hierarchic and centralized way.
C
The participation of civil society organizations and other non-state actors in the formulation of China’s foreign policy interests is extremely limited.
D
It is an authoritarian state.
E
It constructs its foreign relations on the basis of a normative understating in that it is China’s historical and civilizational mission to project its values abroad.
Açıklama:
China is against the idea of a universal civilization as well as the practices of setting global standards of human rights. No country whatsoever should have the claim to universal truths or values. Therefore, from China’s perspective, the promotion of liberal democracy, or any other political ideology, should be immediately discarded from the vocabulary of foreign policy.
It does not construct its foreign relations on the basis of a normative understating in that it is China’s historical and civilizational mission to project its values abroad.
It does not construct its foreign relations on the basis of a normative understating in that it is China’s historical and civilizational mission to project its values abroad.
Soru 41
Which of the following is true?
Seçenekler
A
The European Parliament is more privileged than The European Council and the European Commission
B
The President of the European Council and the EU High Representative for security and foreign policy are the most powerful bureaucrats to represent the EU.
C
The EU speaks with one voice in the realm of foreign policy.
D
The well-established regional initiatives of the EU have been revised in the process of adaptation to the changing dynamics in the so-called greater Middle Eastern region.
E
The EU’s dealings with the countries in the so-called MENA region have contributed to the formation of a ‘we’ feeling between the northern and southern shores of the Mediterranean.
Açıklama:
All the other options have wrong information regarding the diplomacy of the European Union except for B.
Soru 42
EU’s over-dependence on the United States has resulted in;
Seçenekler
A
impediment over the EU’s ability to forge a distinctive European approach to global security problems
B
the EU members to invest in security and common foreign policy.
C
Pressure over EU members
D
Spending EU’S scarce resources on security and defense
E
A fatal blow to EU’s credibility.
Açıklama:
Too much dependence on American security commitment has not only militated against the EU’s ability to forge a distinctive European approach to global security problems but also led the EU members to underinvest in security and common foreign policy.
Soru 43
Which of the following countries seem to be the country that has the most potential to help re-structure the dynamics of the liberal world order in the years to come?
Seçenekler
A
America
B
China
C
Russia
D
Germany
E
France
Açıklama:
China now seems to be the country that has the most potential to help re-structure the dynamics of the liberal world order in the years to come.
Soru 44
What are the advantages of China having connections to the non-western worlds?
Seçenekler
A
China could import many of the raw materials from countries that it needs for its production capacity to continue
B
As a resource-rich country, China could export commodities abroad.
C
The slowing down economy of China could accelerate again.
D
China could stop protecting its internal market behind trade walls.
E
China could export materials to non-western countries for higher prices.
Açıklama:
Such connections to the non-western world seem to offer China an advantage like importing many of the raw materials from these countries that it needs for its production capacity to continue.
Soru 45
Which of the following is NOT among the principles that China values much?
Seçenekler
A
a father-like status of the state in the eyes of people
B
primacy of family bonds over individuality
C
primacy of state sovereignty over popular sovereignty
D
primacy of guilt culture over shame culture
E
unitary state identity
Açıklama:
Among its principles, there is primacy of shame culture over guilt culture not the other way round
Soru 46
Which of the following is true about what sets China apart from western powers?
Seçenekler
A
Its commitment to state-led capitalism
B
Its commitment to state-based morality
C
Its commitment to society-based capitalism
D
Its ignorance on hierarchical organization of social relations
E
Its commitment to decentralized administrative system
Açıklama:
What seem to set apart China from western powers are its commitment to state-led capitalism, society-based morality, hierarchical organization of societal relations, centralized administrative system, a defensive realpolitik security culture and a Confucian understanding of the Chinese state as a civilization.
Soru 47
Which of the following is NOT among international organizations that reflect China’s interests and priorities?
Seçenekler
A
BRICS
B
One Belt One Road Initiative
C
The Asian Infrastructure and Investment Bank
D
New Development Bank
E
OECD
Açıklama:
China has also been trying to bring into existence rival international organizations that reflect China’s interests and priorities much better than the existing global institutions. The formation of Shanghai Cooperation Organization, BRICS, New Development Bank, the Asian Infrastructure and Investment Bank, the One Belt One Road Initiative all attest to China’s determination to help create alternative institutional structures that could offer China-friendly solutions to global public good problems.
Soru 48
Which of the following is among major criticism directed to Russia?
Seçenekler
A
Russia acts similar to European Union
B
Russia acts similar to the United States
C
Russia acts as a new and novel realpolitik power
D
Russia believes in the primacy of material capabilities
E
Russia doesn’t believe in the use of brute military force
Açıklama:
The major criticism directed to Russia is that unlike the post-modern powers of the European Union and the liberal power the United States, Russia acts as a typical realpolitik power which deeply believes in the primacy of material power capabilities, the use of brute military force and commanding spheres of influence in global power politics.
Soru 49
Which of the following is the correct reading of Eurasian Union Initiative?
Seçenekler
A
A step-back in Russia’s reign in its near-abroad
B
A counter measure to limit the reach of European Union
C
A precaution against global terror attacks
D
A strategic planning to stop the spread of United States’ influence over Afghanistan
E
A forward move to re-unite against China’s economic influence in the Eastern Europe area
Açıklama:
This thinking seems also to be the main reason why Russia fought against Georgia in August 2008 and strongly opposed Ukraine’s incorporation into the West through the signing of an Association agreement between Ukraine and the European Union in late 2013, as well as Ukraine’s eventual accession to NATO. This also explains why the Eurasian Union initiative should be read as a counter measure by Russia in order to limit the reach of the European Union into its neighborhood.
Soru 50
Which of the following best completes the following sentence ? “A completely secular culture in which people of different sex, faith, ethnicity, sexual preferences, and languages are completely equal before the law and the primary role of state is to ensure this heterogeneity is something _____________________ in Putin’s Russia”
Seçenekler
A
valuable
B
predictable
C
secured
D
unacceptable
E
admirable
Açıklama:
The meaning of life of an ordinary Russian emanates from his/her belonging to the larger Russian community in which common societal values take priority over individual quest for happiness and well-being. This perspective in Russian thinking seems to lay behind the objections to western notions of tolerance and heterogeneity. A completely secular culture in which people of different sex, faith, ethnicity, sexual preferences, and and languages are completely equal before the law and the primary role of state is to ensure this heterogeneity is something unacceptable in Putin’s Russia
Soru 51
Which of the following is TRUE?
Seçenekler
A
The United States assumed that economic, European Union economic, social and political integration would endanger a strong market for American goods and capital.
B
The organizations such as the United Nations, International Monetary Fund, World Bank and NATO all embody the common international principles and preferences.
C
The United States assumed that European Union would help the U.S. contain the existential threat emanating from the Soviet Union more cost-effectively.
D
Since the early years of the Cold War era, the U.S. has mainly avoided an ‘internationalist’ mentality
E
The 1990s and much of the 2000s demonstrated that the U.S. was a shattered power on earth.
Açıklama:
The key international organizations, such as the United Nations, International Monetary Fund, World Bank and NATO all embody the American principles and preferences. The U.S. also played a facilitative role in the foundation of the European Union. The assumption was that economic, social and political integration among western European liberal democratic states would not only bring into existence a strong market for American goods and capital but also help the U.S. contain the existential threat emanating from the Soviet Union more costeffectively.
Soru 52
Which of the following started a global war on terror?
Seçenekler
A
The Second World War
B
The First World War
C
The ethnic wars in the Balkans
D
September 11
E
The collapse of the Soviet Union
Açıklama:
The ominous terrorist attacks on U.S. territories on Sep. 11, 2001, did not only awaken the American rulers to the rise of a new world order that might not be as hospitable as the one before, but also urged them to engage in a global war on terror, during which American troops set foot in Afghanistan to topple Taliban and in Iraq to overthrow Saddam’s regime.
Soru 53
What is more important for American foreign policy nowadays?
Seçenekler
A
Middle Eastern security
B
Humanitarian interventions
C
Counter-terrorism
D
Dealing with China
E
Democracy promotion exercise
Açıklama:
It is now abundantly clear that that the U.S. does not want to channel too much of its attention and capabilities to European and Middle Eastern security challenges. Rather, it would like to see its European allies pay much of the bill in such theatres. With Obama and Trump, the focus on great power relations came back. Dealing with China and Russia now appears to be more important than focusing on humanitarian interventions, counter-terrorism and democracy promotion exercises.
Soru 54
Which of the following is TRUE?
I. Americans are now more an Indo-Pacific and East Asian nation.
II. Geopolitical, demographic, economic and security developments in East Asia will lose its attractiveness to the U.S soon.
III.According to many American foreign and security policy experts, the ideology of Putinism is clearly multilateral.
I. Americans are now more an Indo-Pacific and East Asian nation.
II. Geopolitical, demographic, economic and security developments in East Asia will lose its attractiveness to the U.S soon.
III.According to many American foreign and security policy experts, the ideology of Putinism is clearly multilateral.
Seçenekler
A
I and II
B
II and III
C
I and III
D
Only III
E
Only I
Açıklama:
According to many American foreign and security policy experts, the ideology of Putinism is clearly anti-American, revivalist, nationalistic and unilateral. Besides, Geopolitical, demographic, economic and security developments in East Asia will become more and more important for the the U.S .
Soru 55
What is TRUE about the European Union?
Seçenekler
A
The EU speaks with one voice in the realm of foreign policy.
B
It succeeded in institutionalizing post-modern logic in interstate relations.
C
The head of the European Commission is not very much influential.
D
Member states want to give up their veto right.
E
It was founded in the aftermath of the First World War.
Açıklama:
The contribution of the EU to international peace and cooperation mainly stems from its success in institutionalizing the post-modern logic in interstate relations that increasingly casts doubts on the legitimacy of ‘self-other’ dichotomies. The postmodern values of cosmopolitanism, multiculturalism, secular universalism, multiple interdependencies and soft-power oriented policies abroad have gradually transcended the modern practices of balance of power politics, realpolitik security strategies, selfother distinctions and the prioritization of hard power instruments in interstate relations.
Soru 56
Which country has NOT followed the strategy of protecting its internal market behind trade walls?
Seçenekler
A
Taiwan
B
South Korea
C
Singapore
D
Hong Kong
E
China
Açıklama:
China, unlike other Asian tigers, namely Taiwan, South Korea, Singapore and Hong Kong, has not followed the strategy of protecting its internal market behind trade walls and singling out key sectors where the state would invest overwhelmingly.
Soru 57
Which of the following is TRUE?
I. A novel characteristic of China’s economic development is the strong economic relations that China has established with many countries located in the non-western world.
II.China has the largest reserves in US dollars and its access to American market, technology and foreign direct investment is still important for years to come.
III. China cannot risk its internal transformation process at home by confronting its neighbors and key global actors, such as the United States
I. A novel characteristic of China’s economic development is the strong economic relations that China has established with many countries located in the non-western world.
II.China has the largest reserves in US dollars and its access to American market, technology and foreign direct investment is still important for years to come.
III. China cannot risk its internal transformation process at home by confronting its neighbors and key global actors, such as the United States
Seçenekler
A
I and III
B
Only III
C
I, II, III
D
II and III
E
Only I
Açıklama:
All of the items are true.
Soru 58
Which is NOT an example of alternative institutional structures that could offer China-friendly solutions to global public good problems?
Seçenekler
A
The Asian Infrastructure and Investment Bank
B
New Development Bank
C
BRICS
D
Shanghai Cooperation Organization
E
IMF
Açıklama:
The formation of Shanghai Cooperation Organization, BRICS, New Development Bank, the Asian Infrastructure and Investment Bank, the One Belt One Road Initiative all attest to China’s determination to help create alternative institutional structures that could offer China-friendly solutions to global public good problems.
Soru 59
In which establishment process was Russia an active agent?
Seçenekler
A
IMF
B
NATO
C
The Asian Infrastructure and Investment Bank
D
The One Belt One Road Initiative
E
Eurasian Economic Union
Açıklama:
Active Russian agency in the establishment of the Eurasian Economic Union, the Shanghai Cooperation Organization and BRICSs should be read as Russia’s growing determination to offer an alternative world order to the one shaped by western powers.
Soru 60
Which of the following is TRUE about Russia?
I. Today’s Russia is rebuilt on the red values of communist era and the white values of Orthodox Christianity.
II. In Russian geopolitical thinking, the notion of ‘sphere of influence’ occupies an insignificant place.
III. Russia is the geopolitical hegemon of the Eurasian region.
I. Today’s Russia is rebuilt on the red values of communist era and the white values of Orthodox Christianity.
II. In Russian geopolitical thinking, the notion of ‘sphere of influence’ occupies an insignificant place.
III. Russia is the geopolitical hegemon of the Eurasian region.
Seçenekler
A
I and III
B
I and II
C
Only III
D
Only II
E
II and III
Açıklama:
In Russian geopolitical thinking, the notion of ‘sphere of influence’ occupies an important place.
Soru 61
Which one is NOT one of the principles that the USA was built on?
Seçenekler
A
Individual freedom
B
Free entrepreneurship
C
Limited government
D
Checks and balances in the Constitution
E
Totalitarian regime
Açıklama:
At its foundation, the U.S. proved to be different from traditional powers in Europe and other continents. The immigrant nature of the American society led the founders of the republic to build their country on the basis of liberal, democratic, and pluralist norms, further enshrining the principles of individual freedom, free entrepreneurship, limited government and checks and balances in the Constitution. In the realm of diplomacy and foreign policy, the rulers of the country long shunned the practices of getting involved in other states’ internal affairs and becoming part of geopolitical competitions in other continents. The geographical location of the country, being walled from other places through two oceans to the east and west, enabled the early generations to focus their attention solely on economic development and political cohesion at home.
Soru 62
During its foundation, unless any other power threatened the U.S. national interests, the U.S. leaders did not have much interest in having a fight. What was this policy called?
Seçenekler
A
Unilateralism
B
Isolationism
C
Anarchism
D
Liberalism
E
Individualism
Açıklama:
Unless other continents, most notably Europe and Asia, came under the domination of an anti- American power block and unless any other global power threatened the U.S. national interests by trying to take a strong presence in America’s near abroad, the U.S. leaders did not show strong enthusiasm to pursue ambitious policies to institutionalize American dominance across the globe. Hence the strong ‘isolationist’ impulse in American diplomatic practices.
Soru 63
Which of the following is NOT one of the reasons why the U.S. played a facilitative role in the foundation of the European Union?
Seçenekler
A
To create economic integration among western European liberal democratic states
B
To create social integration among western European liberal democratic states
C
To create political integration among western European liberal democratic states
D
To create a strong market for American goods and capital
E
To create itself another super opponent besides the Soviet Union
Açıklama:
The U.S. played a facilitative role in the foundation of the European Union. The assumption was that economic, social, and political integration among western European liberal democratic states would not only bring into existence a strong market for American goods and capital but also help the U.S. contain the existential threat emanating from the Soviet Union more cost-effectively.
Soru 64
In today's world, which policy does the USA focus on more?
Seçenekler
A
Humanitarian interventions
B
Counter-terrorism
C
Democracy promotion exercises
D
Dealing with China and Russia
E
Dealing with the growing anarchy in the Middle East
Açıklama:
Dealing with the challenges arising from resurgent Russia, instability in the Balkans and the growing anarchy in the Middle East and North Africa is first and foremost the responsibility of European allies. What happens in these locations affect Europe more than the U.S. It is now abundantly clear that that the U.S. does not want to channel too much of its attention and capabilities to European and Middle Eastern security challenges. Rather, it would like to see its European allies pay much of the bill in such theatres. With Obama and Trump, the focus on great power relations came back. Dealing with China and Russia now appears to be more important than focusing on humanitarian interventions, counter-terrorism, and democracy promotion exercises.
Soru 65
Which of the following do NOT aid the President of the USA in the formulation of U.S. foreign policy interests?
Seçenekler
A
Department of Defense
B
Ministry of Justice
C
Department of State
D
National Security Council
E
National Economic Council
Açıklama:
In the US state apparatus, Department of Defense, Department of State, National Security Council, National Economic Council, Department of Commerce, Department of Treasury, Central Intelligence Organization, and United States Trade Representative do all to aid the President in the formulation of U.S. foreign policy interests. The President is in charge of the execution of foreign policy and acts as the commander in chief during peace and war times.
Soru 66
Which organization is by far the most successful example of international institutions aiming at transcending traditional/modern interstate relations through the formation of collective identities and supranational institutions?
Seçenekler
A
European Union
B
NATO
C
United Nations
D
European Economic Community
E
European Parliament
Açıklama:
The EU is by far the most successful example of international institutions aiming at transcending traditional/modern interstate relations through the formation of collective identities and supranational institutions. What seems to set the EU apart from other polities is that the post-modern logic underpinning its integration process has mainly culminated in the formation of a security community among its members as well as the prioritization of multiple interdependencies and soft/normative power instruments in its relations with external actors.
Soru 67
With the latest crises, such as Brexit, in the EU, which nation is seen the most likely to assume the leadership in the Union?
Seçenekler
A
France
B
Italy
C
Germany
D
Greece
E
Spain
Açıklama:
The latest crises engulfing EU members appear to have brought forward the issue of leadership inside the EU. Despite the fact that Germany has come under the limelight in this regard, it is still far from certain that Germany has accepted to rise to this challenge and other members, notably France, have already acquiesced to German leadership inside the union. From a principled point of view, it would be good for the EU to see Germany take on the mantle of leadership and help the Union find its way in the uncharted waters of growing challenges, for Germany seems to be the only power inside the EU having this potential.
Soru 68
In today's world, which country seems to be the country that has the most potential to help re-structure the dynamics of the liberal world order in the years to come?
Seçenekler
A
The USA
B
Russia
C
India
D
Turkey
E
China
Açıklama:
China now seems to be the country that has the most potential to help re-structure the dynamics of the liberal world order in the years to come. For long, successive American administrations have tended to believe that China would likely transform into a responsible stakeholder of the western-led liberal world order because China was benefiting from this economically.
Soru 69
Which is one of the views that China defends regarding global standards?
Seçenekler
A
There should be a promotion of liberal democracy in foreign policy.
B
No country whatsoever should have the claim to universal truths or values.
C
There should be different political ideologies in foreign policy.
D
Rules, values and norms are not relative and doesn't change according to time and space configurations.
E
There should not be any set of rules, values, and norms in its state-society relations and external dealings.
Açıklama:
China is against the idea of a universal civilization as well as the practices of setting global standards of human rights. No country whatsoever should have the claim to universal truths or values. Therefore, from China’s perspective, the promotion of liberal democracy, or any other political ideology, should be immediately discarded from the vocabulary of foreign policy. Rules, values and norms are relative and products of different time and space configurations. This does not, however, mean that China does not adhere to a certain set of rules, values and norms in its state-society relations and external dealings.
Soru 70
Which statement is correct about Russian society?
Seçenekler
A
It is built on the primacy of patriarchal values.
B
Individualistic morality exists in Russian society.
C
Russian society evinces individualistic or cosmopolitan ethics over a predisposition to communitarian ethics.
D
The meaning of life of an ordinary Russian emanates from his/her individual self.
E
It has a culture in which people of different sex and sexual preferences are equal before the law.
Açıklama:
It is believed that Russian society is built on the primacy of patriarchal and communal values instead of self-regarding individualistic morality. Russian society evinces a predisposition to communitarian ethics over individualistic or cosmopolitan ethics. That is to say that the meaning of life of an ordinary Russian emanates from his/her belonging to the larger Russian community in which common societal values take priority over an individual quest for happiness and well-being. This perspective in Russian thinking seems to lay behind the objections to western notions of tolerance and heterogeneity. A completely secular culture in which people of different sex, faith, ethnicity, sexual preferences, and languages are completely equal before the law and the primary role of the state is to ensure this heterogeneity is something unacceptable in Putin’s Russia.
Ünite 8
Soru 1
What can be defined as an attempt to explore and reconcile conflicting positions in order to reach an acceptable outcome?
Seçenekler
A
Negotiation
B
Diplomacy
C
Policy
D
Win-set
E
181
Açıklama:
Negotiation can be defined as an attempt to explore and reconcile conflicting positions in order to reach an acceptable outcome. Whatever the nature of the outcome, which may actually favour one party more than another, the purpose of negotiation is the identification of areas of common interest and conflict
Soru 2
- It is a conflict management tool used widely across a diverse set of contentious cases, running the gamut from divorce settlement talks to labor management negotiations to peace efforts between warring states.
- Regardless of the type of conflict to which it is applied, the distinguishing feature of this concept is the introduction of an outside or third party into the negotiation process between the disputing sides with, at least partially, the aim of producing a settlement between the two sides.
What concept possesses these features?
Seçenekler
A
Diplomacy
B
Mediation
C
Win-set
D
Policy
E
Peacer accords
Açıklama:
Mediation is a conflict management tool used widely across a diverse set of contentious cases, running the gamut from divorce settlement talks to labor management negotiations to peace efforts between warring states. Regardless of the type of conflict to which it is applied, the distinguishing feature of mediation is the introduction of an outside or third party into the negotiation process between the disputing sides with, at least partially, the aim of producing a settlement between the two sides.
Soru 3
- It is a binding legal text produced through negotiations between disputing parties to institutionalize the conditions agreed.
- It may focus a wide array of issues ranging from peacemaking to visa regimes, from trade to usage of bordering rivers.
What concept has these features?
Seçenekler
A
Diplomatic agreement
B
Ratification
C
Peace accords
D
Negotiation
E
Diplomatic practice
Açıklama:
A diplomatic agreement or protocol is a binding legal text produced through negotiations between disputing parties to institutionalize the conditions agreed. Diplomatic agreements may focus a wide array of issues ranging from peacemaking to visa regimes, from trade to usage of bordering rivers.
Soru 4
What is the framework term for foreign policy decision-making which can be defined as any desirable outcome from an international bargaining process?
Seçenekler
A
Win-set
B
Bargain
C
Negotiation
D
Mediation
E
Peace negotiation
Açıklama:
Win-set is a term coined by Robert Putnam in his famous article that he developed a framework for foreign policy decision-making (Putnam, 1988). According to Putnam’s framework, win-set of an actor can be defined as any desirable outcome from an international bargaining process. In other words, any outcome within the range of its win-set would be considered as gain by the actor. The formation of this win-set, according to Putnam, is directly related with the domestic political dynamics. Therefore, win-sets that determine the foreign policy agenda of a country is directly connected with the domestic politics of that country, according to Putnam’s framework.
Soru 5
What is a non-coercive, non-violent and ultimately non-binding form of intervention?
Seçenekler
A
Negotiation
B
Mediation
C
Diplomacy
D
Agreement
E
Peace accords
Açıklama:
Mediation is a non-coercive, non-violent and ultimately nonbinding form of intervention
Soru 6
Which of these countries offered mediation to Spanish and Catalonian parties after emergence of crisis following the independence referendum in Catalonia in 2017?
Seçenekler
A
Algeria
B
Norway
C
Canada
D
Switzerland
E
Finland
Açıklama:
Switzerland as a “neutral country” for more than 600 years (Kriesi and Trechsel 2008), offered mediation to Spanish and Catalonian parties after emergence of crisis following the independence referendum in Catalonia in 2017.
Soru 7
Which country has played mediator role in the peace talks between Israel and Palestine?
Seçenekler
A
Switzerland
B
Finland
C
Canada
D
Algeria
E
Norway
Açıklama:
Norway has played mediator role in several disputes and its capital Oslo has been home to several peace talks such as the one between Israel and Palestine
Soru 8
Which country informally mediated between Argentina and Uruguay on the Uruguay River and helped them reach a mediation?
Seçenekler
A
Canada
B
Spain
C
Brasil
D
Finland
E
Switzerland
Açıklama:
The dispute between Argentina and Uruguay on the Uruguay River is mediated by the King of Spain (Goldstein and Pevehouse, 2014: 258). The mediation was an informal one. Yet, the provisions suggested by the mediator were respected by both parties and the decision of the World Court in the Hague followed these provisions and legalized them. In other words, an informal mediation process led to a formal trial process in the World Court and turned into a formal resolution.
Soru 9
Which country played a significant role in the gathering of Ottawa Convention on Ban on Land Mines which initiated such an important process and turned into a binding agreement for more than 140 countries?
Seçenekler
A
Switzerland
B
Canada
C
Finland
D
Norway
E
Algeria
Açıklama:
Canada played a significant role in the gathering of Ottawa Convention on Ban on Land Mines. As a medium sized state, Canada has opened itself a space in world politics by initiating such an important process which turned into a binding agreement for more than 140 countries.
Soru 10
Which country has served as a mediator in the settlement of various conflicts varying from conflict between the Indonesian government and Aceh region to Kosovo conflict?
Seçenekler
A
Finland
B
Norway
C
Switzerland
D
Spain
E
Denmark
Açıklama:
Former president of Finland, Martti Ahtisaari has served as a mediator in the settlement of various conflicts varying from conflict between the Indonesian government and Aceh region to Kosovo conflict (Ahtisaari, 2008; Perrit, 2010). In fact, Ahtisaari became a prominent figure in international mediation practices especially after his retirement from Finnish politics and took initiative himself to prompt international society to take more active initiative in the settlement of international crises. For his efforts, he was awarded Nobel Peace Prize in 2008.
Soru 11
Which of the followings can be defined as an attempt to explore and reconcile conflicting positions in order to reach an acceptable outcome?
Seçenekler
A
Mediation.
B
Ratification.
C
Diplomatic agreement.
D
Negotiation.
E
Formal mediation.
Açıklama:
Negotiation can be defined as an attempt to explore and reconcile conflicting positions in order to reach an acceptable outcome. Therefore, the correct option is D.
Soru 12
Which of the followings is a term coined by Robert Putnam in his famous article that he developed a framework for foreign policy decision-making?
Seçenekler
A
Win-set.
B
Zero-sum game.
C
Win-win.
D
DDR.
E
Mediation.
Açıklama:
Win-set is a term coined by Robert Putnam in his famous article that he developed a framework for foreign policy decision-making (Putnam, 1988). According to Putnam’s framework, win-set of an actor can be defined as any desirable outcome from an international bargaining process. In other words, any outcome within the range of its win-set would be considered as gain by the actor. The formation of this win-set, according to Putnam, is directly related with the domestic political dynamics. Therefore, win-sets that determine the foreign policy agenda of a country is directly connected with the domestic politics of that country, according to Putnam’s framework. Therefore, the correct option is A.
Soru 13
Which of the followings refers to a conflict management tool used widely across a diverse set of contentious cases?
Seçenekler
A
Negotiation.
B
Ratification.
C
Mediation.
D
Agreement.
E
DDR.
Açıklama:
Mediation is a conflict management tool used widely across a diverse set of contentious cases, running the gamut from divorce settlement talks to labor management negotiations to peace efforts between warring states. Therefore, the correct option is C.
Soru 14
I. Voluntary form of intervention,
II. Turning an original bilateral dispute into triadic interaction,
III. Operating many basis,
IV. Extension and continuation of the parties’ own conflict management efforts
Which of the ones listed above is among the features of mediation?
II. Turning an original bilateral dispute into triadic interaction,
III. Operating many basis,
IV. Extension and continuation of the parties’ own conflict management efforts
Which of the ones listed above is among the features of mediation?
Seçenekler
A
I, II & III.
B
II & IV.
C
I, II & IV.
D
II, III & IV.
E
Only IV.
Açıklama:
What are the basic features of a mediation intervention? A giant in the mediation studies, Bercovitch goes beyond just proposing a definition and clarifies the eight characteristics of international mediation as follows (Bercovitch, 1992: 4-5):
1. Mediation is an extension and continuation of the parties’ own conflict management efforts.
2. Mediation involves the intervention of an individual, group or organization into a dispute between two or more actors.
3. Mediation is a non-coercive, non-violent and ultimately nonbinding form of intervention.
4. Mediation turns an original bilateral dispute into triadic interaction of some kind.
5. A mediator enters a dispute in order to affect, change, resolve, modify or influence it in some way.
6. Mediators bring with them, consciously or otherwise, ideas, knowledge, resources and interests of their own or of the group
or organization they represent.
7. Mediation is a voluntary form of intervention.
8. Mediation operates on an ad hoc basis only.
Therefore, the correct option is C.
1. Mediation is an extension and continuation of the parties’ own conflict management efforts.
2. Mediation involves the intervention of an individual, group or organization into a dispute between two or more actors.
3. Mediation is a non-coercive, non-violent and ultimately nonbinding form of intervention.
4. Mediation turns an original bilateral dispute into triadic interaction of some kind.
5. A mediator enters a dispute in order to affect, change, resolve, modify or influence it in some way.
6. Mediators bring with them, consciously or otherwise, ideas, knowledge, resources and interests of their own or of the group
or organization they represent.
7. Mediation is a voluntary form of intervention.
8. Mediation operates on an ad hoc basis only.
Therefore, the correct option is C.
Soru 15
What is the next step when a successful mediated negotiation is finalized?
Seçenekler
A
Negotiation.
B
Diplomatic agreement.
C
Diplomatic practices.
D
Ratification.
E
Mediation.
Açıklama:
Once a successful mediated negotiation is finalized, the next step is to officialize the agreed conditions through a diplomatic agreement of which clauses would be binding for all signatory parties. Therefore, the correct option is B.
Soru 16
Which of the following settlements cannot be a focus for diplomatic agreement?
Seçenekler
A
Violent conflicts.
B
Visa Regimes.
C
Regime of international rivers.
D
Negotiations with hijackers.
E
Multiparty treaties.
Açıklama:
Ultimate aim for negotiation is to reach an agreement which avoids use of force and bring a peaceful solution to the problem. Once a successful mediated negotiation is finalized, the next step is to officialize the agreed conditions through a diplomatic agreement of which clauses would be binding for all signatory parties. A diplomatic agreement or protocol, in this context, is a binding legal text produced through negotiations between disputing parties to institutionalize the conditions agreed. Therefore, the correct option is D.
Soru 17
Which of the followings refers to the approval of an agreement by the domestic agents of a country?
Seçenekler
A
Informal mediation.
B
Negotiation.
C
Mediation.
D
Ratification.
E
Peace accords.
Açıklama:
Enforcement of diplomatic agreements is also an important topic to address. When a diplomatic agreement is signed, the final step for it to be put into practice is the ratification process. Ratification is simply the approval of an agreement by the domestic agents of a country. Therefore, the correct option is D.
Soru 18
Which of the followings refers to the mediation practice in which conflicting parties voluntarily pick a third party mediator to intervene in the conflict and mediate the parties?
Seçenekler
A
Informal mediation.
B
Formal mediation.
C
Negotiation.
D
Ratification.
E
Diplomatic agreement.
Açıklama:
Informal mediation is a mediation practice in which conflicting parties voluntarily pick a third party mediator to intervene in the conflict and mediate the parties. Therefore, the correct option is A.
Soru 19
Which of the followings refers to the processes start after the authorization of a person by usually an international organization?
Seçenekler
A
Informal mediation.
B
Formal mediation.
C
Diplomatic agreement.
D
Negotiation.
E
Ratification.
Açıklama:
Formal mediation processes start after the authorization of a person by usually an international organization. Therefore, the correct option is B.
Soru 20
Which of the followings is not one of the issues that have to be addressed by peace accords?
Seçenekler
A
Powersharing.
B
Local election results.
C
Transitional justice.
D
War crimes.
E
Reintegration of former combatants.
Açıklama:
Peace accords after long standing conflicts inevitably have to address sensitive issues such as powersharing in the post-conflict term, transitional justice, war crimes and rehabilitation and reintegration of former combatants. Therefore, the correct option is B.
Soru 21
Which country used the negotiation process to gain time and prepare for an attack against a secessionist guerilla group in 2009?
Seçenekler
A
Sri Lanka
B
India
C
Spain
D
France
E
Nigeria
Açıklama:
An example of a negotiation process which is used as a tactic to gain time is the talks between the government of Sri Lanka and Tamil Tigers (Weiss 2011). The fight between the government forces and Tamil Tigers, a secessionist guerrilla group, lasted more than two decades and caused thousands of casualties on both parties. The negotiations between the parties were initiated once again in early 2008, yet the failure of the process triggered a heavy assault by the government forces on Tamil Tigers in early 2009. In May 2009, the government declared victory and Tigers admitted the defeat. Later, it was understood that the government of Sri Lanka was actually using the negotiation process which was relatively calm and peaceful to prepare for a final attack to defeat the Tigers decisively and annihilate the organization. In fact, it was clear that Sri Lankan army was mobilizing and preparing for the attack since a long time frame including the negotiation period.
Soru 22
- This is a term coined by Robert Putnam in his famous article that he developed a framework for foreign policy decision-making.
- It can be defined as any desirable outcome from an international bargaining process.
- It is directly related with the domestic political dynamics.
What is the diplomatic concept defined above?
Seçenekler
A
DDR
B
WIN-SET
C
Mediation
D
Negotiation
E
Ratification
Açıklama:
Win-set is a term coined by Robert Putnam in his famous article that he developed a framework for foreign policy decision-making (Putnam, 1988). According to Putnam’s framework, win-set of an actor can be defined as any desirable outcome from an international bargaining process. In other words, any outcome within the range of its win-set would be considered as gain by the actor. The formation of this win-set, according to Putnam, is directly related with the domestic political dynamics. Therefore, win-sets that determine the foreign policy agenda of a country is directly connected with the domestic politics of that country, according to Putnam’s framework.
Soru 23
Who mediated the dispute between Argentina and Uruguay on the Uruguay river?
Seçenekler
A
Martti Ahtisaari
B
The King of Spain
C
Algeria
D
Canada
E
Finland
Açıklama:
The dispute between Argentina and Uruguay on the Uruguay River is mediated by the King of Spain.
Soru 24
Which offered mediation to Spanish and Catalonian parties after emergence of crisis following the independence referendum in Catalonia in 2017?
Seçenekler
A
Algeria
B
Norway
C
Finland
D
Turkey
E
Switzerland
Açıklama:
Switzerland as a “neutral country” for more than 600 years (Kriesi and Trechsel 2008), offered mediation to Spanish and Catalonian parties after emergence of crisis following the independence referendum in Catalonia in 2017.
Soru 25
Which country has played mediator role in several disputes and several peace talks such as the one between Israel and Palestine?
Seçenekler
A
Switzerland
B
Canada
C
Norway
D
Spain
E
Algeria
Açıklama:
Norway has played mediator role in several disputes and its capital Oslo has been home to several peace talks such as the one between Israel and Palestine.
Soru 26
Which country played a significant role in the gathering of a convention to ban land mines which turned into a binding agreement for more than 140 countries?
Seçenekler
A
Spain
B
Algeria
C
Norway
D
Canada
E
Finland
Açıklama:
Canada played a significant role in the gathering of Ottawa Convention on Ban on Land Mines (Anderson 2000). As a medium sized state, Canada has opened itself a space in world politics by initiating such an important process which turned into a binding agreement for more than 140 countries.
Soru 27
Which country took the initiative and tried to mediate between Iran and the USA in Iranian Hostage Crisis in 1979?
Seçenekler
A
Finland
B
Norway
C
Switzerland
D
Algeria
E
Canada
Açıklama:
Another good example of small state mediation is the initiative of Algeria in the settlement of Iranian Hostage Crisis in 1979.
Soru 28
Which country's former president served as a mediator in the settlement of various conflicts varying from conflict between the Indonesian government and Aceh region to Kosovo conflict, became a prominent figure in international mediation and won a Nobel Peace Prize in 2008?
Seçenekler
A
Finland
B
Norway
C
Switzerland
D
Spain
E
Algeria
Açıklama:
Former president of Finland, Martti Ahtisaari has served as a mediator in the settlement of various conflicts varying from conflict between the Indonesian government and Aceh region to Kosovo conflict (Ahtisaari, 2008; Perrit, 2010). In fact, Ahtisaari became a prominent figure in international mediation practices especially after his retirement from Finnish politics and took initiative himself to prompt international society to take more active initiative in the settlement of international crises. For his efforts, he was awarded Nobel Peace Prize in 2008.
Soru 29
In which country did mediation and negotiation end a civil war and as a result, Lomé Peace Accord was signed in 1999?
Seçenekler
A
Sierra Leone
B
Rwanda
C
Angola
D
Ivory Coast
E
Sri Lanka
Açıklama:
After mediation and negotiation practices, parties agreed on several diplomatic agreements which brought peace. Lomé Peace Accord, for example, is the peace agreement signed by Sierra Leonean government and Revolutionary United Front (RUF) and its leader Foday Sankoh in 1999, which ended the civil war in Sierra Leone (Abraham 2001).
Soru 30
What it the name of the process in which disputants attempt to resolve their differences with the assistance of an acceptable third party?
Seçenekler
A
Negotiation
B
Mediation
C
Diplomatic agreement
D
Ratification
E
WIN-SET
Açıklama:
Mediation may be defined as a process in which disputants attempt to resolve their differences with the assistance of an acceptable third party.
Soru 31
What is the first thing that the term negotiation refers to?
Seçenekler
A
Outcome
B
Process
C
Method
D
Parties
E
Negotiator
Açıklama:
First thing to clarify is to emphasize that the term negotiation refers to the process instead of the outcome.
Soru 32
Which of the following is NOT true about the term "win-set"?
Seçenekler
A
Robert Putnam coined it.
B
It is a framework for foreign policy decision-making.
C
It is any desirable outcome from an international bargaining process.
D
The formation of this win-set is related with the foreign political dynamics.
E
Any outcome within the range of its win-set would be considered as gain by the actor.
Açıklama:
The formation of this win-set, according to Putnam, is directly related with the domestic political dynamics.
Soru 33
I. Dissolve
II. Disarmament
III. Demobilization
IV. Reservation
V. Reintegration
Which of the given are the items in DDR in peace negotiations?
II. Disarmament
III. Demobilization
IV. Reservation
V. Reintegration
Which of the given are the items in DDR in peace negotiations?
Seçenekler
A
I, III, V
B
II, III, IV
C
II, III, V
D
I, II, IV
E
I, II, V
Açıklama:
DDR stands for disarmament, demobilization and reintegration.
Soru 34
What is the success of negotiations directly dependent upon?
Seçenekler
A
The overall relations
B
The power of decision-making
C
The head of negotiating committee
D
The negotiation committee
E
The attitudes of the negotiating parties
Açıklama:
Success of negotiations is directly dependent upon the attitudes of the negotiating parties.
Soru 35
"The need for and use of _______________ in diplomatic practices usually appear when there is a protracted conflict between two or more parties."
Which of the following fills in the gap correctly?
Which of the following fills in the gap correctly?
Seçenekler
A
Authorization
B
Diplomacy
C
Negotiation
D
Mediation
E
Interaction
Açıklama:
The need for and use of mediation in diplomatic practices usually appear when there is a protracted conflict between two or more parties.
Soru 36
Which of the following is NOT one of the characteristics of international mediation?
Seçenekler
A
It is an extension and continuation of negotiation.
B
It is a coercive and binding.
C
It turns an original bilateral dispute into triadic interaction.
D
It involves the intervention.
E
It operates on an ad hoc basis only.
Açıklama:
Mediation is a non-coercive, non-violent and ultimately nonbinding.
Soru 37
Which of the following countries has NOT played a mediator role in disputes?
Seçenekler
A
Palestine
B
Norway
C
Canada
D
Switzerland
E
Algeria
Açıklama:
Norway has played mediator role in several disputes and its capital Oslo has been home to several peace talks such as the one between Israel and Palestine. Canada played a significant role in the gathering of Ottawa Convention on Ban on Land Mines. Switzerland as a “neutral country” for more than 600 years offered mediation to Spanish and Catalonian parties.Another good example of small state mediation is the initiative of Algeria in the settlement of Iranian Hostage Crisis in 1979.
Soru 38
How many types of mediation are there?
Seçenekler
A
2
B
3
C
4
D
5
E
6
Açıklama:
We can mention two main types of mediation: formal and informal.
Soru 39
What is the binding legal text produced through negotiations between disputing parties to institutionalize the conditions agreed?
Seçenekler
A
Mediated negotiation
B
Diplomatic agreement
C
Political outcome
D
Official result
E
Final call
Açıklama:
A diplomatic agreement or protocol is a binding legal text produced through negotiations between disputing parties to institutionalize the conditions agreed.
Soru 40
Which of the following is the final step for an international diplomatic agreement to be put in practice?
Seçenekler
A
Enforcement
B
Agreement
C
Ratification
D
Constitution
E
Approval
Açıklama:
Ratification is a final step for an international diplomatic agreement to be put in practice.
Soru 41
Which country played a significant role in the gathering of Ottawa Convention on Ban on Land Mines?
Seçenekler
A
Canada
B
USA
C
Switzerland
D
Spain
E
Turkey
Açıklama:
Canada played a significant role in the gathering of Ottawa Convention on Ban on Land Mines (Anderson 2000). As a medium sized state, Canada has opened itself a space in world politics by initiating such an important process which turned into a binding agreement for more than 140 countries.
Soru 42
Which country has played mediator role in several disputes and its capital has been home to several peace talks such as the one between Israel and Palestine?
Seçenekler
A
Switzerland
B
Norway
C
Canada
D
Finland
E
Denmark
Açıklama:
Norway has played mediator role in several disputes and its capital Oslo has been home to several peace talks such as the one between Israel and Palestine.
Soru 43
Which of the following as a “neutral country” for more than 600 years offered mediation to Spanish and Catalonian parties after emergence of crisis following the independence referendum in Catalonia in 2017?
Seçenekler
A
Switzerland
B
Norway
C
Finland
D
Algeria
E
Canada
Açıklama:
Switzerland as a “neutral country” for more than 600 years (Kriesi and Trechsel 2008), offered mediation to Spanish and Catalonian parties after emergence of crisis following the independence referendum in Catalonia in 2017
Soru 44
Which country took initiative in the settlement of Iranian Hostage Crisis in 1979?
Seçenekler
A
Switzerland
B
Canada
C
Norway
D
Finland
E
Algeria
Açıklama:
Another good example of small state mediation is the initiative of Algeria in the settlement of Iranian Hostage Crisis in 1979.
Soru 45
Who has served as a mediator in the settlement of various conflicts varying from conflict between the Indonesian government and Aceh region to Kosovo conflict and became a prominent figure in international mediation practices and was awarded Nobel Peace Prize in 2008?
Seçenekler
A
Martti Ahtisaari
B
King of Spain
C
Ban Ki-moon
D
Foday Sankoh
E
Gao Hucheng
Açıklama:
Former president of Finland, Martti Ahtisaari has served as a mediator in the settlement of various conflicts varying from conflict between the Indonesian government and Aceh region to Kosovo conflict (Ahtisaari, 2008; Perrit, 2010). In fact, Ahtisaari became a prominent figure in international mediation practices especially after his retirement from Finnish politics and took initiative himself to prompt international society to take more active initiative in the settlement of international crises. For his efforts, he was awarded Nobel Peace Prize in 2008.
Soru 46
Which country's leader informally mediated the dispute between Argentina and Uruguay on the Uruguay River?
Seçenekler
A
Spain
B
Finland
C
Canada
D
Norway
E
Germany
Açıklama:
The dispute between Argentina and Uruguay on the Uruguay River is mediated by the King of Spain. The mediation was an informal one. Yet, the provisions suggested by the mediator were respected by both parties and the decision of the World Court in the Hague followed these provisions and legalized them.
Soru 47
After a big oil spill in a gulf in its waters, which country negotiated with a non-state actor British Petroleum and made an agreement the biggest environmental compensation that is undertaken by a private company in the history?
Seçenekler
A
Canada
B
USA
C
Mexico
D
Norway
E
Japan
Açıklama:
After the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, the government of Mexico and British Petroleum were engaged in a long negotiation process for the compensation of the environmental pollution in the region (Parlett and Weaver 2011). After the negotiations, BP and Mexican government agreed on the biggest compensation that is undertaken by a private company in the history.
Soru 48
What is a final step for an international diplomatic agreement to be put in practice?
Seçenekler
A
Ratification
B
Negotiation
C
Diplomacy
D
Mediation
E
Agreement
Açıklama:
Ratification is a final step for an international diplomatic agreement to be put in practice. In most cases, international diplomatic agreements are presented to parliaments for ratification. Copying this general practice, 87th article of the constitution of Turkey authorizes the Turkish Grand National Assembly for the ratification of international agreements.
Soru 49
- Algeria
- Canada
- Norway
- Iran
Seçenekler
A
I, II and III
B
I, II and IV
C
I, III and IV
D
II, III and IV
E
I, II, III and IV
Açıklama:
Mediation initiatives has contributed to the construction of peace agreements, peaceful solution of several disputes or prevented potential crises to turn into violent conflicts. Yet, it should also be emphasized that mediation is also used as an instrument by the initiator to construct an international role. The initiator country or organization for mediation sometimes does so to have a say in world politics. Role theory of Foreign Policy Analysis (FPA) literature suggests that countries build certain national roles for themselves and conduct their foreign policy accordingly (Holsti 1970; Walker 1987). In this regard, we can see that there are certain countries in contemporary world politics which construct themselves as natural mediators in crisis situations. For instance, Norway has played mediator role in several disputes and its capital Oslo has been home to several peace talks such as the one between Israel and Palestine. Within this context, it is fair to suggest that mediator party also utilizes from the success of its potential mediation. In another case, for instance, Canada played a significant role in the gathering of Ottawa Convention on Ban on Land Mines (Anderson 2000). As a medium sized state, Canada has opened itself a space in world politics by initiating such an important process which turned into a binding agreement for more than 140 countries. Small states also take initiative to mediate in international or domestic crises. For instance, Switzerland as a “neutral country” for more than 600 years (Kriesi and Trechsel 2008), offered mediation to Spanish and Catalonian parties after emergence of crisis following the independence referendum in Catalonia in 2017. Another good example of small state mediation is the initiative of Algeria in the settlement of Iranian Hostage Crisis in 1979 (Slim, 1992: 206). We can mention two main types of mediation: formal and informal (Berkovich and Jackson, 1997). Formal mediation processes start after the authorization of a person by usually an international organization. In formal mediation processes, the mandate and jurisdiction of the mediator are determined in the authorization resolution. In such formal mediation practices, most of the procedural details of the mediation process are predefined.
Soru 50
Which country use negotiation as a tactic to gain time and prepare for an attack against Tamil Tigers, a secessionist group?
Seçenekler
A
Sri Lanka
B
Sierra Leone
C
Ivory Coast
D
Angola
E
Liberia
Açıklama:
An example of a negotiation process which is used as a tactic to gain time is the talks between the government of Sri Lanka and Tamil Tigers (Weiss 2011). The fight between the government forces and Tamil Tigers, a secessionist guerrilla group, lasted more than two decades and caused thousands of casualties on both parties. The negotiations between the parties were initiated once again in early 2008, yet the failure of the process triggered a heavy assault by the government forces on Tamil Tigers in early 2009. In May 2009, the government declared victory and Tigers admitted the defeat. Later, it was understood that the government of Sri Lanka was actually using the negotiation process which was relatively calm and peaceful to prepare for a final attack to defeat the Tigers decisively and annihilate the organization. In fact, it was clear that Sri Lankan army was mobilizing and preparing for the attack since a long time frame including the negotiation period.
Soru 51
Which of the following is a characteristic of win-set strategy?
Seçenekler
A
It has three levels
B
It is achieved through domestic negotiations
C
It is a desirable outcome from an international bargaining process
D
The formation of this win-set is directly related with the international political dynamics
E
Win-sets determine the domestic policy agenda of a country
Açıklama:
Win-set is a desirable outcome from an international bargaining process.
Soru 52
Which of the following is not one of the characteristics of international diplomatic negotiations?
Seçenekler
A
Negotiating parties can be motivated for setting a norm in a broader level.
B
Non-state actors can not take place in international diplomatic negotiations
C
In some cases, DDR constitutes a major topic in a negotiation process
D
International diplomatic negotiations can include an international organization
E
Intentions of the actors are dynamic
Açıklama:
Sometimes international diplomatic negotiations can be among non-state actors.
Soru 53
Which of the following is a characteristic of a mediator?
Seçenekler
A
Mediation operates on ad hoc basis only.
B
A moderator does not modify the dispute
C
A mediator has no right to withdraw
D
Mediators brings the values of his own to the dispute
E
Mediation involves the intervention of an individual
Açıklama:
Mediators brings the values of his own to the dispute
Soru 54
Which of the following is an example of a negotiation process which is used as a tactic to gain time?
Seçenekler
A
Argentina - Uruguay negotiations
B
Israel- Palestine negotiations
C
Iran-Iraq negotiations
D
China-Taiwan negotiations
E
The government of Sri Lanka - Tamil Tigers negotiations
Açıklama:
Negotiations between the government of Sri Lanka - Tamil Tigers is an example of a negotiation process which is used as a tactic to gain time
Soru 55
Which of the following above can be subjects of interstate diplomatic negotiations?
I. Custom issues
II.Sea borders
III.Violent conflicts
IV. International trade
V. Global Environmental issues
I. Custom issues
II.Sea borders
III.Violent conflicts
IV. International trade
V. Global Environmental issues
Seçenekler
A
I, IV,V
B
III,IV,V
C
I,II and III
D
II,III and IV
E
I,III and V
Açıklama:
Custom issues, sea borders and Violent conflicts
Soru 56
Which of the following is an example of diplomatic negotiations with de facto states ?
Seçenekler
A
Israel-Palestine
B
Turkey- Turkish Republic of Norther Cyprus
C
Armenia- Turkish Republic of Norther Cyprus
D
China - Taiwan
E
Indonesia-Sri Lanka
Açıklama:
China and Taiwan can be given as an example of diplomatic negotiations with de facto states.
Soru 57
Which of the following is not an example of negotiation processes from state to non-state actors?
Seçenekler
A
Mexico and British Petroleum
B
Iran and International Atomic Energy Agency
C
England and the Irish Republican Army
D
Iran and International Atomic Energy Agency
E
Canada and Ottawa Convention
Açıklama:
Canada and Ottawa Convention is not an example of negotiation processes from state to non-state actors
Soru 58
Which of the following is the characteristic of an envoy appointed by the government?
Seçenekler
A
An envoy is from the government
B
An envoy is selected from the same line of business
C
An envoy is respected domestically
D
An envoy is not known internationally
E
An envoy does not have decision-making power
Açıklama:
An envoy is respected domestically
Soru 59
Which of the following is not an example of a mediator country?
Seçenekler
A
Norway
B
Canada
C
Switzerland
D
Algeria
E
Iran
Açıklama:
Iran is not a mediator country
Soru 60
What is the natural ratification organ in all liberal democracies ?
Seçenekler
A
The Prime Minister
B
The Parliament
C
The President
D
The Mayor
E
The Minister of Foreign Affairs
Açıklama:
Parliament is the natural ratification organ in all liberal democracies
The parliament
The parliament
Soru 61
Which of the following is an example of a negotiation process which is used as a tactic to gain time?
Seçenekler
A
Peace talks initiated by ECOWAS in Liberia and Sierra Leone
B
The negotiation processes leading to Kyoto Protocol
C
Talks between the government of Sri Lanka and Tamil Tigers
D
The negotiations for Paris Agreement on Climate Change
E
The negotiations between the government of Mexico and British Petroleum
Açıklama:
An example of a negotiation process which is used as a tactic to gain time is the talks between the government of Sri Lanka and Tamil Tigers (Weiss 2011). The fight between the government forces and Tamil Tigers, a secessionist guerrilla group, lasted more than two decades and caused thousands of casualties on both parties. The negotiations between the parties were initiated once again in early 2008, yet the failure of the process triggered a heavy assault by the government forces on Tamil Tigers in early 2009. In May 2009, the government declared victory and Tigers admitted the defeat. Later, it was understood that the government of Sri Lanka was actually using the negotiation process which was relatively calm and peaceful to prepare for a final attack to defeat the Tigers decisively and annihilate the organization. The correct answer is C.
Soru 62
I. Land and sea borders
II. Water issues
III. settlement of violent conflicts
IV. trade and customs issues
Which of the problems above can be subjects of interstate diplomatic negotiations?
II. Water issues
III. settlement of violent conflicts
IV. trade and customs issues
Which of the problems above can be subjects of interstate diplomatic negotiations?
Seçenekler
A
I.
B
I. and II.
C
III.
D
III. and IV.
E
I., II., III., and IV.
Açıklama:
Obviously, state to state negotiations constitute the vast majority of all diplomatic negotiations. Interstate negotiations may be conducted on various issues. Land and sea borders, water issues (Dinar 2000), settlement of violent conflicts, trade and customs issues and other specific problems between states can be subjects of interstate diplomatic negotiations. The correct answer is E.
Soru 63
Sometimes states negotiate with political entities that they do not recognize as a sovereign state. Which of the following is an example for such diplomatic negotiations with de facto states?
Seçenekler
A
The negotiations on sea borders between China and Taiwan
B
The negotiation between the government of Mexico and British Petroleum
C
The negotiation processes that led to Kyoto Protocol
D
The negotiations for Paris Agreement on Climate Change
E
The negotiations between the government of Iran and IAEA
Açıklama:
It should also be noted that sometimes states negotiate with political entities that they do not recognize as a sovereign state. Diplomatic negotiations with de facto states can be given examples of such interactions. For instance, the negotiations on sea borders between China and Taiwan are typical examples of this sort. Although China does not recognize Taiwan as a sovereign state, it did not form an obstacle for the Chinese government to contact the Taiwanese authorities directly within the context of negotiations (Saunders and Kastner 2009). The correct answer is A.
Soru 64
Which of the following negotiation includes an international organization and a specific state government?
Seçenekler
A
The negotiations on sea borders between China and Taiwan
B
The negotiations between the British government and the Irish Republican Army
C
The negotiation between the government of Mexico and British Petroleum
D
The negotiations between Iran and International Atomic Energy Agency
E
The talks between the government of Sri Lanka and Tamil Tigers
Açıklama:
Finally, international diplomatic negotiations can include an international organization and a specific state government. Acceptance to an international organization is a typical topic for such a negotiation. Another possible subject matter for such a negotiation can be focusing on a behavior of a government which is not welcomed by international community and the international organization would initiate a process to convince that government to commit certain internationally recognized standards or principles. The nuclear negotiations between the government of Iran and International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) is a good example for such a negotiation that took place between a government and an authorized international organization (Sebenius and Singh 2012). The correct answer is D.
Soru 65
Which of the following is a typical example of negotiation processes between a government and an insurgency/terrorist organization?
Seçenekler
A
The negotiation processes that led to Kyoto Protocol
B
The negotiations between the British government and the Irish Republican Army
C
The negotiations for Paris Agreement on Climate Change
D
The negotiations on sea borders between China and Taiwan
E
The negotiations between BP and Mexican government
Açıklama:
Another example of state to non-state negotiation is those taking place between governments and terror organizations and insurgency groups (Neumann 2007). For example, the negotiations between the British government and the Irish Republican Army (IRA) is a typical example of negotiation processes between a government and an insurgency/terrorist organization. After long talks and negotiations, in 2005, IRA was convinced to leave the guns and will continue to its actions only in legal political space. The correct answer is B.
Soru 66
Which of the following is NOT an example of negotiations between states and non-state actors?
Seçenekler
A
The negotiations between the British government and the Irish Republican Army
B
The negotiations between Iranian government and International Atomic Energy Agency
C
Peace talks initiated by ECOWAS in Liberia and Sierra Leone
D
The negotiations between the government of Mexico and British Petroleum
E
The negotiations between the British government and the Irish Republican Army (IRA)
Açıklama:
Thirdly, sometimes international diplomatic negotiations can be among non-state actors. Such negotiation processes usually take place after multiparty civil wars (Raeymaekers et al. 2008). Such civil wars appear in weak state structure, leave destructive consequences and cause to failed-state structures. In such fragile environments, several armed groups get engage in violent conflict to fill the power vacuum. Negotiation among them usually starts following the mediation initiative by a third party. In such negotiations, parties discuss how to share power in post-conflict state-building process. Disarmament, demobilization and reintegration (DDR) of the former combatants constitute a major topic in a negotiation process running among insurgency groups. Peace talks initiated by ECOWAS in Liberia and Sierra Leone after protracted civil wars can be considered as good examples of negotiation processes facilitated by an international organization for the insurgency groups to discuss power-sharing in the post-conflict term (Halistoprak 2015). The correct answer is C.
Soru 67
I. Mediation is a voluntary form of intervention.
II. Mediation is a coercive and violent form of intervention.
III. Mediation operates on an ad hoc basis only.
Which of the statements above TRUE about meditations?
II. Mediation is a coercive and violent form of intervention.
III. Mediation operates on an ad hoc basis only.
Which of the statements above TRUE about meditations?
Seçenekler
A
I.
B
II.
C
III.
D
I. and II.
E
I. and III.
Açıklama:
What are the basic features of a mediation intervention? A giant in the mediation studies, Bercovitch goes beyond just proposing a definition and clarifies the eight characteristics of international mediation as follows (Bercovitch, 1992: 4-5):
1. Mediation is an extension and continuation of the parties’ own conflict management efforts.
2. Mediation involves the intervention of an individual, group or organization into a dispute between two or more actors.
3. Mediation is a non-coercive, non-violent and ultimately nonbinding form of intervention.
4. Mediation turns an original bilateral dispute into triadic interaction of some kind. By increasing the number of actors from two to three, mediation effects considerable structural changes and creates new focal points for an agreement.
5. A mediator enters a dispute in order to affect, change, resolve, modify or influence it in some way.
6. Mediators bring with them, consciously or otherwise, ideas, knowledge, resources and interests of their own or of the group or organization they represent. Mediators are often important actors with their own assumptions and agendas about the dispute in question. International mediators are both interested and concerned parties.
7. Mediation is a voluntary form of intervention. This means the parties retain their control over the outcome (if not always the process) of their dispute, as well as their freedom to accept or reject mediation or mediator’s proposals.
8. Mediation operates on an ad hoc basis only.
The correct answer is E.
1. Mediation is an extension and continuation of the parties’ own conflict management efforts.
2. Mediation involves the intervention of an individual, group or organization into a dispute between two or more actors.
3. Mediation is a non-coercive, non-violent and ultimately nonbinding form of intervention.
4. Mediation turns an original bilateral dispute into triadic interaction of some kind. By increasing the number of actors from two to three, mediation effects considerable structural changes and creates new focal points for an agreement.
5. A mediator enters a dispute in order to affect, change, resolve, modify or influence it in some way.
6. Mediators bring with them, consciously or otherwise, ideas, knowledge, resources and interests of their own or of the group or organization they represent. Mediators are often important actors with their own assumptions and agendas about the dispute in question. International mediators are both interested and concerned parties.
7. Mediation is a voluntary form of intervention. This means the parties retain their control over the outcome (if not always the process) of their dispute, as well as their freedom to accept or reject mediation or mediator’s proposals.
8. Mediation operates on an ad hoc basis only.
The correct answer is E.
Soru 68
Which of the following refers to the approval of an agreement by the domestic agents of a country?
Seçenekler
A
Protocol
B
Meditation
C
Negotiation
D
Ratification
E
Diplomatic Agreement
Açıklama:
Enforcement of diplomatic agreements is also an important topic to address. When a diplomatic agreement is signed, the final step for it to be put into practice is the ratification process. Ratification is simply the approval of an agreement by the domestic agents of a country. Ratifying body may vary depending on the regime of the signatory country. The correct answer is D.
Soru 69
When did Armenia unilaterally declare that they cancelled the diplomatic protocol between Turkey and Armenia that was signed in 2009?
Seçenekler
A
2016
B
2017
C
2018
D
2019
E
2020
Açıklama:
For example, diplomatic protocols between Turkey and Armenia signed in 2009 regarding the normalization of the relations between the two countries remained inactive because neither country brought these protocols to their respective parliaments and ratified them. Recently in early 2018, Armenia declared that they cancelled the protocol unilaterally for it became obvious that both countries are not ratifying them (ABCNews, March 1, 2018). The correct answer is C.
Soru 70
Which of the following diplomatic agreements focuses on visa regimes?
Seçenekler
A
The nuclear agreement between IAEA and Iran.
B
Schengen Agreement
C
Nile Basin protocols among Sudan, Egypt and Ethiopia
D
The China-Australia Free Trade Agreement
E
The agreement between the Colombian Government and FARC
Açıklama:
Diplomatic agreements may focus a wide array of issues ranging from peacemaking to visa regimes, from trade to usage of bordering rivers. We may examine several types of diplomatic agreements. One type of diplomatic agreement is multiparty treaties that regulate a general regime of a certain practice for the signatories. For instance, the set of negotiated legal documents under Schengen Agreement, which introduced a common visa regime among the EU countries and several partner countries can be considered as an example of this type. After a negotiation process, the member states to the European Union enforced this diplomatic agreement and committed to a common visa program. Later, Schengen Agreement and the visa regime regulated in it was enlarged in a manner to include several non-EU countries such as Switzerland and Norway. The correct answer is B.